Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sheheryar Zaidi
dblp:267/5656
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 28% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 18% Representation and self-supervised learning · 16% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
denoising training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › model uncertainty
ensemble uncertainty |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Ensemble Search for Uncertainty Estimation and Dataset Shift · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
equivariance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie Groups · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
equivariant self-attention |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie Groups · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
lie group equivariance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie Groups · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Ensemble Search for Uncertainty Estimation and Dataset Shift · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
self-attention |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie Groups · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Ensemble Search for Uncertainty Estimation and Dataset Shift · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › importance sampling
adaptive importance sampling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Target-Aware Bayesian Inference: How to Beat Optimal Conventional Estimators · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Target-Aware Bayesian Inference: How to Beat Optimal Conventional Estimators · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
monte carlo methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Target-Aware Bayesian Inference: How to Beat Optimal Conventional Estimators · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular property prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction · ICLR 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie Groups · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised pretraining · 1.3denoising autoencoder · 1.3uncertainty calibration · 0.5self-attention · 0.5lie group theory · 0.5group theory · 0.5deep ensembles · 0.5averaging operators · 0.5architecture search · 0.5amortized inference · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction
Sheheryar Zaidi, Michael Schaarschmidt, James Martens, Hyunjik Kim, Yee Whye Teh, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Peter W. Battaglia, Razvan Pascanu, Jonathan Godwin |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant ModelsabstractIt is widely believed that engineering a model to be invariant/equivariant improves generalisation. Despite the growing popularity of this approach, a precise characterisation of the generalisation benefit is lacking. By considering the simplest case of linear models, this paper provides the first provably non-zero improvement in generalisation for invariant/equivariant models when the target distribution is invariant/equivariant with respect to a compact group. Moreover, our work reveals an interesting relationship between generalisation, the number of training examples and properties of the group action. Our results rest on an observation of the structure of function spaces under averaging operators which, along with its consequences for feature averaging, may be of independent interest. Bryn Elesedy, Sheheryar Zaidi |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie GroupsabstractGroup equivariant neural networks are used as building blocks of group invariant neural networks, which have been shown to improve generalisation performance and data efficiency through principled parameter sharing. Such works have mostly focused on group equivariant convolutions, building on the result that group equivariant linear maps are necessarily convolutions. In this work, we extend the scope of the literature to self-attention, that is emerging as a prominent building block of deep learning models. We propose the LieTransformer, an architecture composed of LieSelfAttention layers that are equivariant to arbitrary Lie groups and their discrete subgroups. We demonstrate the generality of our approach by showing experimental results that are competitive to baseline methods on a wide range of tasks: shape counting on point clouds, molecular property regression and modelling particle trajectories under Hamiltonian dynamics. Michael J. Hutchinson, Charline Le Lan, Sheheryar Zaidi, Emilien Dupont, Yee Whye Teh, Hyunjik Kim |
ICML | 3 |
| 2021 | Neural Ensemble Search for Uncertainty Estimation and Dataset ShiftabstractEnsembles of neural networks achieve superior performance compared to standalone networks in terms of accuracy, uncertainty calibration and robustness to dataset shift. Deep ensembles, a state-of-the-art method for uncertainty estimation, only ensemble random initializations of a fixed architecture. Instead, we propose two methods for automatically constructing ensembles with varying architectures, which implicitly trade-off individual architectures’ strengths against the ensemble’s diversity and exploit architectural variation as a source of diversity. On a variety of classification tasks and modern architecture search spaces, we show that the resulting ensembles outperform deep ensembles not only in terms of accuracy but also uncertainty calibration and robustness to dataset shift. Our further analysis and ablation studies provide evidence of higher ensemble diversity due to architectural variation, resulting in ensembles that can outperform deep ensembles, even when having weaker average base learners. To foster reproducibility, our code is available: https://github.com/automl/nes Sheheryar Zaidi, Arber Zela, Thomas Elsken, Christopher C. Holmes, Frank Hutter, Yee Whye Teh |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Target-Aware Bayesian Inference: How to Beat Optimal Conventional EstimatorsabstractStandard approaches for Bayesian inference focus solely on approximating the posterior distribution. Typically, this approximation is, in turn, used to calculate expectations for one or more target functions—a computational pipeline that is inefficient when the target function(s) are known upfront. We address this inefficiency by introducing a framework for target–aware Bayesian inference (TABI) that estimates these expectations directly. While conventional Monte Carlo estimators have a fundamental limit on the error they can achieve for a given sample size, our TABI framework is able to breach this limit; it can theoretically produce arbitrarily accurate estimators using only three samples, while we show empirically that it can also breach this limit in practice. We utilize our TABI framework by combining it with adaptive importance sampling approaches and show both theoretically and empirically that the resulting estimators are capable of converging faster than the standard $\mathcal{O}(1/N)$ Monte Carlo rate, potentially producing rates as fast as $\mathcal{O}(1/N^2)$. We further combine our TABI framework with amortized inference methods, to produce a method for amortizing the cost of calculating expectations. Finally, we show how TABI can be used to convert any marginal likelihood estimator into a target aware inference scheme and demonstrate the substantial benefits this can yield. Tom Rainforth, Adam Golinski, Frank D. Wood, Sheheryar Zaidi |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |