Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sheheryar Zaidi

dblp:267/5656 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 28% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 18% Representation and self-supervised learning · 16%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
denoising training
0.712023
Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training
0.712023
Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › model uncertainty
ensemble uncertainty
0.512021
Neural Ensemble Search for Uncertainty Estimation and Dataset Shift · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
equivariance
0.512021
Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant Models · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network
0.512021
LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie Groups · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
equivariant self-attention
0.512021
LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie Groups · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.512021
Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant Models · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
lie group equivariance
0.512021
LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie Groups · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
0.512021
Neural Ensemble Search for Uncertainty Estimation and Dataset Shift · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
self-attention
0.512021
LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie Groups · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.512021
Neural Ensemble Search for Uncertainty Estimation and Dataset Shift · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › importance sampling
adaptive importance sampling
0.412020
Target-Aware Bayesian Inference: How to Beat Optimal Conventional Estimators · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.412020
Target-Aware Bayesian Inference: How to Beat Optimal Conventional Estimators · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
monte carlo methods
0.412020
Target-Aware Bayesian Inference: How to Beat Optimal Conventional Estimators · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular property prediction
0.212023
Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction · ICLR 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud processing
0.112021
LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie Groups · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised pretraining · 1.3denoising autoencoder · 1.3uncertainty calibration · 0.5self-attention · 0.5lie group theory · 0.5group theory · 0.5deep ensembles · 0.5averaging operators · 0.5architecture search · 0.5amortized inference · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction
Sheheryar Zaidi, Michael Schaarschmidt, James Martens, Hyunjik Kim, Yee Whye Teh, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Peter W. Battaglia, Razvan Pascanu, Jonathan Godwin
ICLR1
2021 Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant Models
abstract
It is widely believed that engineering a model to be invariant/equivariant improves generalisation. Despite the growing popularity of this approach, a precise characterisation of the generalisation benefit is lacking. By considering the simplest case of linear models, this paper provides the first provably non-zero improvement in generalisation for invariant/equivariant models when the target distribution is invariant/equivariant with respect to a compact group. Moreover, our work reveals an interesting relationship between generalisation, the number of training examples and properties of the group action. Our results rest on an observation of the structure of function spaces under averaging operators which, along with its consequences for feature averaging, may be of independent interest.
Bryn Elesedy, Sheheryar Zaidi
ICML2
2021 LieTransformer: Equivariant Self-Attention for Lie Groups
abstract
Group equivariant neural networks are used as building blocks of group invariant neural networks, which have been shown to improve generalisation performance and data efficiency through principled parameter sharing. Such works have mostly focused on group equivariant convolutions, building on the result that group equivariant linear maps are necessarily convolutions. In this work, we extend the scope of the literature to self-attention, that is emerging as a prominent building block of deep learning models. We propose the LieTransformer, an architecture composed of LieSelfAttention layers that are equivariant to arbitrary Lie groups and their discrete subgroups. We demonstrate the generality of our approach by showing experimental results that are competitive to baseline methods on a wide range of tasks: shape counting on point clouds, molecular property regression and modelling particle trajectories under Hamiltonian dynamics.
Michael J. Hutchinson, Charline Le Lan, Sheheryar Zaidi, Emilien Dupont, Yee Whye Teh, Hyunjik Kim
ICML3
2021 Neural Ensemble Search for Uncertainty Estimation and Dataset Shift
abstract
Ensembles of neural networks achieve superior performance compared to standalone networks in terms of accuracy, uncertainty calibration and robustness to dataset shift. Deep ensembles, a state-of-the-art method for uncertainty estimation, only ensemble random initializations of a fixed architecture. Instead, we propose two methods for automatically constructing ensembles with varying architectures, which implicitly trade-off individual architectures’ strengths against the ensemble’s diversity and exploit architectural variation as a source of diversity. On a variety of classification tasks and modern architecture search spaces, we show that the resulting ensembles outperform deep ensembles not only in terms of accuracy but also uncertainty calibration and robustness to dataset shift. Our further analysis and ablation studies provide evidence of higher ensemble diversity due to architectural variation, resulting in ensembles that can outperform deep ensembles, even when having weaker average base learners. To foster reproducibility, our code is available: https://github.com/automl/nes
Sheheryar Zaidi, Arber Zela, Thomas Elsken, Christopher C. Holmes, Frank Hutter, Yee Whye Teh
NeurIPS1
2020 Target-Aware Bayesian Inference: How to Beat Optimal Conventional Estimators
abstract
Standard approaches for Bayesian inference focus solely on approximating the posterior distribution. Typically, this approximation is, in turn, used to calculate expectations for one or more target functions—a computational pipeline that is inefficient when the target function(s) are known upfront. We address this inefficiency by introducing a framework for target–aware Bayesian inference (TABI) that estimates these expectations directly. While conventional Monte Carlo estimators have a fundamental limit on the error they can achieve for a given sample size, our TABI framework is able to breach this limit; it can theoretically produce arbitrarily accurate estimators using only three samples, while we show empirically that it can also breach this limit in practice. We utilize our TABI framework by combining it with adaptive importance sampling approaches and show both theoretically and empirically that the resulting estimators are capable of converging faster than the standard $\mathcal{O}(1/N)$ Monte Carlo rate, potentially producing rates as fast as $\mathcal{O}(1/N^2)$. We further combine our TABI framework with amortized inference methods, to produce a method for amortizing the cost of calculating expectations. Finally, we show how TABI can be used to convert any marginal likelihood estimator into a target aware inference scheme and demonstrate the substantial benefits this can yield.
Tom Rainforth, Adam Golinski, Frank D. Wood, Sheheryar Zaidi
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4