Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mikhail Salnikov

dblp:267/5694 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8865-6677ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 68% Question answering and dialogue systems · 27% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 4%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › retrieval-augmented generation
adaptive retrieval
1.722025
LLM-Independent Adaptive RAG: Let the Question Speak for Itself · EMNLP 2025
Adaptive Retrieval Without Self-Knowledge? Bringing Uncertainty Back Home · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
1.722025
LLM-Independent Adaptive RAG: Let the Question Speak for Itself · EMNLP 2025
Adaptive Retrieval Without Self-Knowledge? Bringing Uncertainty Back Home · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question understanding
question classification
0.912025
Will It Still Be True Tomorrow? Multilingual Evergreen Question Classification to Improve Trustworthy QA · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › cross-lingual transfer
multilingual transfer
0.312025
Will It Still Be True Tomorrow? Multilingual Evergreen Question Classification to Improve Trustworthy QA · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
query understanding
0.312025
LLM-Independent Adaptive RAG: Let the Question Speak for Itself · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.312025
LLM-Independent Adaptive RAG: Let the Question Speak for Itself · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.7uncertainty estimation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Adaptive Retrieval Without Self-Knowledge? Bringing Uncertainty Back Home
abstract
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) improves correctness of Question Answering (QA) and addresses hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs), yet greatly increase computational costs. Besides, RAG is not always needed as may introduce irrelevant information. Recent adaptive retrieval methods integrate LLMs’ intrinsic knowledge with external information appealing to LLM self-knowledge, but they often neglect efficiency evaluations and comparisons with uncertainty estimation techniques. We bridge this gap by conducting a comprehensive analysis of 35 adaptive retrieval methods, including 8 recent approaches and 27 uncertainty estimation techniques, across 6 datasets using 10 metrics for QA performance, self-knowledge, and efficiency. Our findings show that uncertainty estimation techniques often outperform complex pipelines in terms of efficiency and self-knowledge, while maintaining comparable QA performance.
Viktor Moskvoretskii, Maria Marina, Mikhail Salnikov, Nikolay Ivanov 0001, Sergey Pletenev, Daria Galimzianova, Nikita Krayko, Vasily Konovalov, Irina Nikishina, Alexander Panchenko
ACL (1)3
2025 LLM-Independent Adaptive RAG: Let the Question Speak for Itself
abstract
Maria Marina, Nikolay Ivanov, Sergey Pletenev, Mikhail Salnikov, Daria Galimzianova, Nikita Krayko, Vasily Konovalov, Alexander Panchenko, Viktor Moskvoretskii. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Maria Marina, Nikolay Ivanov 0001, Sergey Pletenev, Mikhail Salnikov, Daria Galimzianova, Nikita Krayko, Vasily Konovalov, Alexander Panchenko, Viktor Moskvoretskii
EMNLP4
2025 Will It Still Be True Tomorrow? Multilingual Evergreen Question Classification to Improve Trustworthy QA
abstract
Sergey Pletenev, Maria Marina, Nikolay Ivanov, Daria Galimzianova, Nikita Krayko, Mikhail Salnikov, Vasily Konovalov, Alexander Panchenko, Viktor Moskvoretskii. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Sergey Pletenev, Maria Marina, Nikolay Ivanov 0001, Daria Galimzianova, Nikita Krayko, Mikhail Salnikov, Vasily Konovalov, Alexander Panchenko, Viktor Moskvoretskii
EMNLP6
2025 ShortPathQA: A Dataset for Controllable Fusion of Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs
Mikhail Salnikov, Andrey Sakhovskiy, Irina Nikishina, Aida Usmanova, Angelie Kraft, Cedric Möller, Debayan Banerjee, Junbo Huang, Longquan Jiang 0001, Rana Abdullah, Xi Yan 0001, Elena Tutubalina, Ricardo Usbeck, Alexander Panchenko
NLDB (1)1
2024 CAM 2.0: End-to-End Open Domain Comparative Question Answering System
abstract
Comparative Question Answering (CompQA) is a Natural Language Processing task that combines Question Answering and Argument Mining approaches to answer subjective comparative questions in an efficient argumentative manner. In this paper, we present an end-to-end (full pipeline) system for answering comparative questions called CAM 2.0 as well as a public leaderboard called CompUGE that unifies the existing datasets under a single easy-to-use evaluation suite. As compared to previous web-form-based CompQA systems, it features question identification, object and aspect labeling, stance classification, and summarization using up-to-date models. We also select the most time- and memory-effective pipeline by comparing separately fine-tuned Transformer Encoder models which show state-of-the-art performance on the subtasks with Generative LLMs in few-shot and LoRA setups. We also conduct a user study for a whole-system evaluation.
Ahmad Shallouf, Hanna Herasimchyk, Mikhail Salnikov, Rudy Alexandro Garrido Veliz, Natia Mestvirishvili, Alexander Panchenko, Chris Biemann, Irina Nikishina
LREC/COLING3
2024 Konstruktor: A Strong Baseline for Simple Knowledge Graph Question Answering
Maria Lysyuk, Mikhail Salnikov, Pavel Braslavski 0001, Alexander Panchenko
NLDB (2)2
2023 Large Language Models Meet Knowledge Graphs to Answer Factoid Questions
Mikhail Salnikov, Hai Le, Prateek Rajput, Irina Nikishina, Pavel Braslavski 0001, Valentin Malykh, Alexander Panchenko
PACLIC1