Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Yingyi Wu

dblp:267/8980 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 84% Computational geometry · 16%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
online optimization
1.222023
Online Optimization over Riemannian Manifolds · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
No-regret Online Learning over Riemannian Manifolds · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online gradient descent
0.712023
Online Optimization over Riemannian Manifolds · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds
0.712023
Online Optimization over Riemannian Manifolds · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Computational geometry › differential geometry
riemannian manifold
0.712023
Online Optimization over Riemannian Manifolds · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.512021
No-regret Online Learning over Riemannian Manifolds · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization
0.512021
No-regret Online Learning over Riemannian Manifolds · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization
riemannian optimization
0.512021
No-regret Online Learning over Riemannian Manifolds · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

riemannian online gradient descent · 1.0frank-wolfe · 1.0bandit algorithms · 1.0geodesic convexity · 0.7bandit feedback · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Online Optimization over Riemannian Manifolds
abstract
Online optimization has witnessed a massive surge of research attention in recent years. In this paper, we propose online gradient descent and online bandit algorithms over Riemannian manifolds in full information and bandit feedback settings respectively, for both geodesically convex and strongly geodesically convex functions. We establish a series of upper bounds on the regrets for the proposed algorithms over Hadamard manifolds. We also find a universal lower bound for achievable regret on Hadamard manifolds. Our analysis shows how time horizon, dimension, and sectional curvature bounds have impact on the regret bounds. When the manifold permits positive sectional curvature, we prove similar regret bound can be established by handling non-constrictive project maps. In addition, numerical studies on problems defined on symmetric positive definite matrix manifold, hyperbolic spaces, and Grassmann manifolds are provided to validate our theoretical findings, using synthetic and real-world data.
Zhipeng Tu, Yiguang Hong, Yingyi Wu, Guodong Shi
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2021 No-regret Online Learning over Riemannian Manifolds
abstract
We consider online optimization over Riemannian manifolds, where a learner attempts to minimize a sequence of time-varying loss functions defined on Riemannian manifolds. Though many Euclidean online convex optimization algorithms have been proven useful in a wide range of areas, less attention has been paid to their Riemannian counterparts. In this paper, we study Riemannian online gradient descent (R-OGD) on Hadamard manifolds for both geodesically convex and strongly geodesically convex loss functions, and Riemannian bandit algorithm (R-BAN) on Hadamard homogeneous manifolds for geodesically convex functions. We establish upper bounds on the regrets of the problem with respect to time horizon, manifold curvature, and manifold dimension. We also find a universal lower bound for the achievable regret by constructing an online convex optimization problem on Hadamard manifolds. All the obtained regret bounds match the corresponding results are provided in Euclidean spaces. Finally, some numerical experiments validate our theoretical results.
Zhipeng Tu, Yiguang Hong, Yingyi Wu, Guodong Shi
NeurIPS4