EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peshal Agarwal
dblp:267/9404
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 61% Optimization for machine learning · 30% Learning theory · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | SnapBoost: A Heterogeneous Boosting Machine · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
gradient boosting |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | SnapBoost: A Heterogeneous Boosting Machine · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › second-order optimization
newton method |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | SnapBoost: A Heterogeneous Boosting Machine · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | SnapBoost: A Heterogeneous Boosting Machine · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random fourier features · 0.4newton descent · 0.4gradient boosting · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Unsupervised Robust Domain Adaptation without Source DataabstractWe study the problem of robust domain adaptation in the context of unavailable target labels and source data. The considered robustness is against adversarial perturbations. This paper aims at answering the question of finding the right strategy to make the target model robust and accurate in the setting of unsupervised domain adaptation without source data. The major findings of this paper are: (i) robust source models can be transferred robustly to the target; (ii) robust domain adaptation can greatly benefit from nonrobust pseudo-labels and the pair-wise contrastive loss. The proposed method of using non-robust pseudo-labels performs surprisingly well on both clean and adversarial samples, for the task of image classification. We show a consistent performance improvement of over 10% in accuracy against the tested baselines on four benchmark datasets. Our source code will be made publicly available. Peshal Agarwal, Danda Pani Paudel, Jan-Nico Zaech, Luc Van Gool |
WACV | 1 |
| 2020 | SnapBoost: A Heterogeneous Boosting MachineabstractModern gradient boosting software frameworks, such as XGBoost and LightGBM, implement Newton descent in a functional space. At each boosting iteration, their goal is to find the base hypothesis, selected from some base hypothesis class, that is closest to the Newton descent direction in a Euclidean sense. Typically, the base hypothesis class is fixed to be all binary decision trees up to a given depth. In this work, we study a Heterogeneous Newton Boosting Machine (HNBM) in which the base hypothesis class may vary across boosting iterations. Specifically, at each boosting iteration, the base hypothesis class is chosen, from a fixed set of subclasses, by sampling from a probability distribution. We derive a global linear convergence rate for the HNBM under certain assumptions, and show that it agrees with existing rates for Newton's method when the Newton direction can be perfectly fitted by the base hypothesis at each boosting iteration. We then describe a particular realization of a HNBM, SnapBoost, that, at each boosting iteration, randomly selects between either a decision tree of variable depth or a linear regressor with random Fourier features. We describe how SnapBoost is implemented, with a focus on the training complexity. Finally, we present experimental results, using OpenML and Kaggle datasets, that show that SnapBoost is able to achieve better generalization loss than competing boosting frameworks, without taking significantly longer to tune. Thomas P. Parnell, Andreea Anghel, Malgorzata Lazuka, Nikolas Ioannou, Sebastian Kurella, Peshal Agarwal, Nikolaos Papandreou, Haralampos Pozidis |
NeurIPS | 6 |