Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jasmine Bayrooti

dblp:267/9542 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 76% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 12% Learning theory · 12%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.912025
Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Through Optimistic Thompson Sampling · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
finite-horizon MDP
0.912025
No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.912025
No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.912025
No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.912025
Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Through Optimistic Thompson Sampling · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
optimistic exploration
0.912025
Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Through Optimistic Thompson Sampling · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.912025
No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling
0.912025
No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
episodic reinforcement learning
0.312025
No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thompson sampling · 0.9elliptical potential lemma · 0.9bellman update · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Through Optimistic Thompson Sampling
abstract
Learning complex robot behavior through interactions with the environment necessitates principled exploration. Effective strategies should prioritize exploring regions of the state-action space that maximize rewards, with optimistic exploration emerging as a promising direction aligned with this idea and enabling sample-efficient reinforcement learning. However, existing methods overlook a crucial aspect: the need for optimism to be informed by a belief connecting the reward and state. To address this, we propose a practical, theoretically grounded approach to optimistic exploration based on Thompson sampling. Our approach is the first that allows for reasoning about _joint_ uncertainty over transitions and rewards for optimistic exploration. We apply our method on a set of MuJoCo and VMAS continuous control tasks. Our experiments demonstrate that optimistic exploration significantly accelerates learning in environments with sparse rewards, action penalties, and difficult-to-explore regions. Furthermore, we provide insights into when optimism is beneficial and emphasize the critical role of model uncertainty in guiding exploration.
Jasmine Bayrooti, Carl Henrik Ek, Amanda Prorok
ICLR1
2025 No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes
abstract
Thompson sampling (TS) is a powerful and widely used strategy for sequential decision-making, with applications ranging from Bayesian optimization to reinforcement learning (RL). Despite its success, the theoretical foundations of TS remain limited, particularly in settings with complex temporal structure such as RL. We address this gap by establishing no-regret guarantees for TS using models with Gaussian marginal distributions. Specifically, we consider TS in episodic RL with joint Gaussian process (GP) priors over rewards and transitions. We prove a regret bound of $\mathcal{\tilde{O}}(\sqrt{KH\Gamma(KH)})$ over $K$ episodes of horizon $H$, where $\Gamma(\cdot)$ captures the complexity of the GP model. Our analysis addresses several challenges, including the non-Gaussian nature of value functions and the recursive structure of Bellman updates, and extends classical tools such as the elliptical potential lemma to multi-output settings. This work advances the understanding of TS in RL and highlights how structural assumptions and model uncertainty shape its performance in finite-horizon Markov Decision Processes.
Jasmine Bayrooti, Sattar Vakili, Amanda Prorok, Carl Henrik Ek
NeurIPS1