Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jasmine Bayrooti
dblp:267/9542
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 76% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 12% Learning theory · 12% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Through Optimistic Thompson Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
finite-horizon MDP |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Through Optimistic Thompson Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
optimistic exploration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Through Optimistic Thompson Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
episodic reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thompson sampling · 0.9elliptical potential lemma · 0.9bellman update · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Through Optimistic Thompson SamplingabstractLearning complex robot behavior through interactions with the environment necessitates principled exploration. Effective strategies should prioritize exploring regions of the state-action space that maximize rewards, with optimistic exploration emerging as a promising direction aligned with this idea and enabling sample-efficient reinforcement learning. However, existing methods overlook a crucial aspect: the need for optimism to be informed by a belief connecting the reward and state. To address this, we propose a practical, theoretically grounded approach to optimistic exploration based on Thompson sampling. Our approach is the first that allows for reasoning about _joint_ uncertainty over transitions and rewards for optimistic exploration. We apply our method on a set of MuJoCo and VMAS continuous control tasks. Our experiments demonstrate that optimistic exploration significantly accelerates learning in environments with sparse rewards, action penalties, and difficult-to-explore regions. Furthermore, we provide insights into when optimism is beneficial and emphasize the critical role of model uncertainty in guiding exploration. Jasmine Bayrooti, Carl Henrik Ek, Amanda Prorok |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | No-Regret Thompson Sampling for Finite-Horizon Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian ProcessesabstractThompson sampling (TS) is a powerful and widely used strategy for sequential decision-making, with applications ranging from Bayesian optimization to reinforcement learning (RL). Despite its success, the theoretical foundations of TS remain limited, particularly in settings with complex temporal structure such as RL. We address this gap by establishing no-regret guarantees for TS using models with Gaussian marginal distributions. Specifically, we consider TS in episodic RL with joint Gaussian process (GP) priors over rewards and transitions. We prove a regret bound of $\mathcal{\tilde{O}}(\sqrt{KH\Gamma(KH)})$ over $K$ episodes of horizon $H$, where $\Gamma(\cdot)$ captures the complexity of the GP model. Our analysis addresses several challenges, including the non-Gaussian nature of value functions and the recursive structure of Bellman updates, and extends classical tools such as the elliptical potential lemma to multi-output settings. This work advances the understanding of TS in RL and highlights how structural assumptions and model uncertainty shape its performance in finite-horizon Markov Decision Processes. Jasmine Bayrooti, Sattar Vakili, Amanda Prorok, Carl Henrik Ek |
NeurIPS | 1 |