Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haeung Choi

dblp:267/9579 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8099-4505ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
consensus protocol
0.912025
Error Correction Code Verifiable Computation Consensus · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › consensus protocol
proof-of-work
0.912025
Error Correction Code Verifiable Computation Consensus · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.312025
Error Correction Code Verifiable Computation Consensus · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › linear code decoding
syndrome decoding
0.312025
Error Correction Code Verifiable Computation Consensus · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

time-varying cryptographic puzzles · 1.7syndrome decoding problem · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Error Correction Code Verifiable Computation Consensus
abstract
In blockchain, proof-of-work (PoW) is a popular consensus mechanism in which block publishers secure block contents through competitive computation. This competition has led to the emergence of specialized computing devices, such as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Consequently, block publishing has become monopolized by a small group of top publishers equipped with ASICs and benefiting from economy of scale. This monopoly undermines immutability and security that are derived from the decentralized structure of blockchains. In this paper, we introduce a type of blockchain consensus algorithm named error-correction code verifiable computation consensus (ECCVCC), which includes conventional PoW. After that, we propose a novel ECCVCC utilizing a syndrome decoding problem as its crypto puzzle. The ECCVCC algorithm suppresses the development of efficient ASICs by utilizing time-varying cryptographic puzzles. As a result, the decentralization of a blockchain with ECCVCC can be improved compared to the blockchains with other consensus algorithms. Our analysis and simulation demonstrate that ECCVCC achieves robust control over block-generation time and difficulty under practical scenarios. Finally, we discuss that ASIC-resistant consensus algorithms, such as ECCVCC, sustain a blockchain network decentralized for a significantly longer period compared to conventional hash-PoW.
Haeung Choi, Seungmin Kim, Heung-No Lee
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1