Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lenart Treven
dblp:267/9666
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 9 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 69% Optimization for machine learning · 9% Efficient and distributed learning · 4% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
3.2 | 4 | 2025 | SOMBRL: Scalable and Optimistic Model-Based RL · NeurIPS 2025 ActSafe: Active Exploration with Safety Constraints for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2025 When to Sense and Control? A Time-adaptive Approach for Continuous-Time RL · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
optimistic exploration |
3.2 | 4 | 2025 | SOMBRL: Scalable and Optimistic Model-Based RL · NeurIPS 2025 ActSafe: Active Exploration with Safety Constraints for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2025 NeoRL: Efficient Exploration for Nonepisodic RL · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
2.3 | 3 | 2025 | SOMBRL: Scalable and Optimistic Model-Based RL · NeurIPS 2025 NeoRL: Efficient Exploration for Nonepisodic RL · NeurIPS 2024 Optimistic Active Exploration of Dynamical Systems · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration › exploration strategies
constrained exploration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ActSafe: Active Exploration with Safety Constraints for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ActSafe: Active Exploration with Safety Constraints for Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Transductive Active Learning: Theory and Applications · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Transductive Active Learning: Theory and Applications · NeurIPS 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
nonlinear dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | NeoRL: Efficient Exploration for Nonepisodic RL · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | NeoRL: Efficient Exploration for Nonepisodic RL · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
safe bayesian optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Transductive Active Learning: Theory and Applications · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › fine-tuning
active finetuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Transductive Active Learning: Theory and Applications · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Transductive Active Learning: Theory and Applications · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian process dynamics · 1.4uncertainty-aware dynamics model · 0.9uncertainty quantification · 0.9policy optimization · 0.9model-based planning · 0.9uncertainty minimization · 0.8sublinear regret analysis · 0.8probabilistic model · 0.8extended MDP formulation · 0.8decision rules · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ActSafe: Active Exploration with Safety Constraints for Reinforcement LearningabstractReinforcement learning (RL) is ubiquitous in the development of modern AI systems. However, state-of-the-art RL agents require extensive, and potentially
unsafe, interactions with their environments to learn effectively. These limitations
confine RL agents to simulated environments, hindering their ability to learn
directly in real-world settings. In this work, we present ActSafe, a novel
model-based RL algorithm for safe and efficient exploration. ActSafe learns
a well-calibrated probabilistic model of the system and plans optimistically
w.r.t. the epistemic uncertainty about the unknown dynamics, while enforcing
pessimism w.r.t. the safety constraints. Under regularity assumptions on the
constraints and dynamics, we show that ActSafe guarantees safety during
learning while also obtaining a near-optimal policy in finite time. In addition, we
propose a practical variant of ActSafe that builds on latest model-based RL advancements and enables safe exploration even in high-dimensional settings such
as visual control. We empirically show that ActSafe obtains state-of-the-art
performance in difficult exploration tasks on standard safe deep RL benchmarks
while ensuring safety during learning. Yarden As, Bhavya Sukhija, Lenart Treven, Carmelo Sferrazza, Stelian Coros, Andreas Krause 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2025 | SOMBRL: Scalable and Optimistic Model-Based RLabstractWe address the challenge of efficient exploration in model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL), where the system dynamics are unknown and the RL agent must learn directly from online interactions. We propose **S**calable and **O**ptimistic **MBRL** (SOMBRL), an approach based on the principle of optimism in the face of uncertainty. SOMBRL learns an uncertainty-aware dynamics model and *greedily* maximizes a weighted sum of the extrinsic reward and the agent's epistemic uncertainty. SOMBRL is compatible with any policy optimizers or planners, and under common regularity assumptions on the system, we show that SOMBRL has sublinear regret for nonlinear dynamics in the (*i*) finite-horizon, (*ii*) discounted infinite-horizon, and (*iii*) non-episodic setting. Additionally, SOMBRL offers a flexible and scalable solution for principled exploration. We evaluate SOMBRL on state-based and visual-control environments, where it displays strong performance across all tasks and baselines. We also evaluate SOMBRL on a dynamic RC car hardware and show SOMBRL outperforms the state-of-the-art, illustrating the benefits of principled exploration for MBRL. Bhavya Sukhija, Lenart Treven, Carmelo Sferrazza, Florian Dörfler, Pieter Abbeel, Andreas Krause 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Bridging the Sim-to-Real Gap with Bayesian InferenceabstractWe present Sim-FSVGD for learning robot dynamics from data. As opposed to traditional methods, Sim-FSVGD leverages low-fidelity physical priors, e.g., in the form of simulators, to regularize the training of neural network models. While learning accurate dynamics already in the low data regime, Sim-FSVGD scales and excels also when more data is available. We empirically show that learning with implicit physical priors results in accurate mean model estimation as well as precise uncertainty quantification. We demonstrate the effectiveness of Sim-FSVGD in bridging the sim-to-real gap on a high-performance RC racecar system. Using model-based RL, we demonstrate a highly dynamic parking maneuver with drifting, using less than half the data compared to the state of the art. Jonas Rothfuss, Bhavya Sukhija, Lenart Treven, Florian Dörfler, Stelian Coros, Andreas Krause 0001 |
IROS | 3 |
| 2024 | Transductive Active Learning: Theory and ApplicationsabstractWe study a generalization of classical active learning to real-world settings with concrete prediction targets where sampling is restricted to an accessible region of the domain, while prediction targets may lie outside this region.
We analyze a family of decision rules that sample adaptively to minimize uncertainty about prediction targets.
We are the first to show, under general regularity assumptions, that such decision rules converge uniformly to the smallest possible uncertainty obtainable from the accessible data.
We demonstrate their strong sample efficiency in two key applications: active fine-tuning of large neural networks and safe Bayesian optimization, where they achieve state-of-the-art performance. Jonas Hübotter, Bhavya Sukhija, Lenart Treven, Yarden As, Andreas Krause 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | NeoRL: Efficient Exploration for Nonepisodic RLabstractWe study the problem of nonepisodic reinforcement learning (RL) for nonlinear dynamical systems, where the system dynamics are unknown and the RL agent has to learn from a single trajectory, i.e., without resets. We propose **N**on**e**pisodic **O**ptistmic **RL** (NeoRL), an approach based on the principle of optimism in the face of uncertainty. NeoRL uses well-calibrated probabilistic models and plans optimistically w.r.t. the epistemic uncertainty about the unknown dynamics. Under continuity and bounded energy assumptions on the system, we
provide a first-of-its-kind regret bound of $\mathcal{O}(\beta_T \sqrt{T \Gamma_T})$ for general nonlinear systems with Gaussian process dynamics. We compare NeoRL to other baselines on several deep RL environments and empirically demonstrate that NeoRL achieves the optimal average cost while incurring the least regret. Bhavya Sukhija, Lenart Treven, Florian Dörfler, Stelian Coros, Andreas Krause 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | When to Sense and Control? A Time-adaptive Approach for Continuous-Time RLabstractReinforcement learning (RL) excels in optimizing policies for discrete-time Markov decision processes (MDP). However, various systems are inherently continuous in time, making discrete-time MDPs an inexact modeling choice.
In many applications, such as greenhouse control or medical treatments, each interaction (measurement or switching of action) involves manual intervention and thus is inherently costly. Therefore,
we generally prefer a time-adaptive approach with fewer interactions with the system.
In this work, we formalize an RL framework,
**T**ime-**a**daptive **Co**ntrol \& **S**ensing (**TaCoS**), that tackles this challenge by optimizing over policies that besides control predict the duration of its application. Our formulation results in an extended MDP that any standard RL algorithm can solve.
We demonstrate that state-of-the-art RL algorithms trained on TaCoS drastically reduce the interaction amount over their discrete-time counterpart while retaining the same or improved performance, and exhibiting robustness over discretization frequency.
Finally, we propose OTaCoS, an efficient model-based algorithm for our setting. We show that OTaCoS enjoys sublinear regret for systems with sufficiently smooth dynamics and empirically results in further sample-efficiency gains. Lenart Treven, Bhavya Sukhija, Yarden As, Florian Dörfler, Andreas Krause 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Optimistic Active Exploration of Dynamical SystemsabstractReinforcement learning algorithms commonly seek to optimize policies for solving one particular task. How should we explore an unknown dynamical system such that the estimated model allows us to solve multiple downstream tasks in a zero-shot manner?
In this paper, we address this challenge, by developing an algorithm -- OPAX -- for active exploration. OPAX uses well-calibrated probabilistic models to quantify the epistemic uncertainty about the unknown dynamics. It optimistically---w.r.t. to plausible dynamics---maximizes the information gain between the unknown dynamics and state observations. We show how the resulting optimization problem can be reduced to an optimal control problem that can be solved at each episode using standard approaches. We analyze our algorithm for general models, and, in the case of Gaussian process dynamics, we give a sample complexity bound and
show that the epistemic uncertainty converges to zero. In our experiments, we compare OPAX with other heuristic active exploration approaches on several environments. Our experiments show that OPAX is not only theoretically sound but also performs well for zero-shot planning on novel downstream tasks. Bhavya Sukhija, Lenart Treven, Cansu Sancaktar, Sebastian Blaes, Stelian Coros, Andreas Krause 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Efficient Exploration in Continuous-time Model-based Reinforcement LearningabstractReinforcement learning algorithms typically consider discrete-time dynamics, even though the underlying systems are often continuous in time. In this paper, we introduce a model-based reinforcement learning algorithm that represents continuous-time dynamics using nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs). We capture epistemic uncertainty using well-calibrated probabilistic models, and use the optimistic principle for exploration. Our regret bounds surface the importance of the measurement selection strategy (MSS), since in continuous time we not only must decide how to explore, but also when to observe the underlying system. Our analysis demonstrates that the regret is sublinear when modeling ODEs with Gaussian Processes (GP) for common choices of MSS, such as equidistant sampling. Additionally, we propose an adaptive, data-dependent, practical MSS that, when combined with GP dynamics, also achieves sublinear regret with significantly fewer samples. We showcase the benefits of continuous-time modeling over its discrete-time counterpart, as well as our proposed adaptive MSS over standard baselines, on several applications. Lenart Treven, Jonas Hübotter, Bhavya Sukhija, Florian Dörfler, Andreas Krause 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Distributional Gradient Matching for Learning Uncertain Neural Dynamics ModelsabstractDifferential equations in general and neural ODEs in particular are an essential technique in continuous-time system identification. While many deterministic learning algorithms have been designed based on numerical integration via the adjoint method, many downstream tasks such as active learning, exploration in reinforcement learning, robust control, or filtering require accurate estimates of predictive uncertainties. In this work, we propose a novel approach towards estimating epistemically uncertain neural ODEs, avoiding the numerical integration bottleneck. Instead of modeling uncertainty in the ODE parameters, we directly model uncertainties in the state space. Our algorithm distributional gradient matching (DGM) jointly trains a smoother and a dynamics model and matches their gradients via minimizing a Wasserstein loss. Our experiments show that, compared to traditional approximate inference methods based on numerical integration, our approach is faster to train, faster at predicting previously unseen trajectories, and in the context of neural ODEs, significantly more accurate. Lenart Treven, Philippe Wenk, Florian Dörfler, Andreas Krause 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |