Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Franco Pellegrini

dblp:268/0613 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9084-8480ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Generative modeling · 28% Efficient and distributed learning · 28% Learning theory · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 56% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 44%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 50% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 50%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.912025
Efficient Molecular Conformer Generation with SO(3)-Averaged Flow Matching and Reflow · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
molecular conformation generation
0.912025
Efficient Molecular Conformer Generation with SO(3)-Averaged Flow Matching and Reflow · ICML 2025
Computational science and engineering
computational chemistry
0.912025
Efficient Molecular Conformer Generation with SO(3)-Averaged Flow Matching and Reflow · ICML 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling
molecular conformation generation
0.912025
Efficient Molecular Conformer Generation with SO(3)-Averaged Flow Matching and Reflow · ICML 2025
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU training
0.912025
Optimizing Data Distribution and Kernel Performance for Efficient Training of Chemistry Foundation Models: A Case Study with MACE · HPDC 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
inductive bias
0.612022
Neural Network Pruning Denoises the Features and Makes Local Connectivity Emerge in Visual Tasks · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
iterative magnitude pruning
0.612022
Neural Network Pruning Denoises the Features and Makes Local Connectivity Emerge in Visual Tasks · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.612022
Neural Network Pruning Denoises the Features and Makes Local Connectivity Emerge in Visual Tasks · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.612022
Neural Network Pruning Denoises the Features and Makes Local Connectivity Emerge in Visual Tasks · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.412020
An analytic theory of shallow networks dynamics for hinge loss classification · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
mean-field approximation
0.412020
An analytic theory of shallow networks dynamics for hinge loss classification · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
overfitting
0.412020
An analytic theory of shallow networks dynamics for hinge loss classification · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
shallow neural networks
0.412020
An analytic theory of shallow networks dynamics for hinge loss classification · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.412020
An analytic theory of shallow networks dynamics for hinge loss classification · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symmetric tensor contraction optimization · 1.7reflow · 1.7multi-objective bin packing · 1.7flow matching · 1.7distillation · 1.7SO(3)-averaged flow · 1.7iterative magnitude pruning · 0.6fully connected network · 0.6mean-field theory · 0.4hinge loss · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Optimizing Data Distribution and Kernel Performance for Efficient Training of Chemistry Foundation Models: A Case Study with MACE
abstract
Chemistry Foundation Models (CFMs) that leverage Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) operating on 3D molecular graph structures are becoming indispensable tools for computational chemists and materials scientists. These models facilitate the understanding of matter and the discovery of new molecules and materials. In contrast to GNNs operating on large homogeneous graphs, GNNs used by CFMs process a large number of geometric graphs of varying sizes, requiring different optimization strategies than those developed for large homogeneous GNNs. This paper presents optimizations for two critical phases of CFM training: data distribution and model training, targeting MACE - a state-of-the-art CFM. We address the challenge of load balancing in data distribution by formulating it as a multi-objective bin packing problem. We propose an iterative algorithm that provides a highly effective, fast, and practical solution, ensuring efficient data distribution. For the training phase, we identify symmetric tensor contraction as the key computational kernel in MACE and optimize this kernel to improve the overall performance. Our combined approach of balanced data distribution and kernel optimization significantly enhances the training process of MACE. Experimental results demonstrate a substantial speedup, reducing per-epoch execution time for training from 12 to 2 minutes on 740 GPUs with a 2.6M sample dataset.
Jesun Sahariar Firoz, Franco Pellegrini, Mario Geiger, Darren Hsu, Jenna A. Bilbrey, Han-Yi Chou, Maximilian Stadler, Markus Höhnerbach, Tingyu Wang 0001, Dejun Lin, Emine Küçükbenli, Henry Sprueill, Ilyes Batatia, Sotiris S. Xantheas, MalSoon Lee, Christopher J. Mundy, Gábor Csányi, Justin S. Smith, P. Sadayappan, Sutanay Choudhury
HPDC2
2025 Efficient Molecular Conformer Generation with SO(3)-Averaged Flow Matching and Reflow
abstract
Fast and accurate generation of molecular conformers is desired for downstream computational chemistry and drug discovery tasks. Currently, training and sampling state-of-the-art diffusion or flow-based models for conformer generation require significant computational resources. In this work, we build upon flow-matching and propose two mechanisms for accelerating training and inference of generative models for 3D molecular conformer generation. For fast training, we introduce the SO(3)-*Averaged Flow* training objective, which leads to faster convergence to better generation quality compared to conditional optimal transport flow or Kabsch-aligned flow. We demonstrate that models trained using SO(3)-*Averaged Flow* can reach state-of-the-art conformer generation quality. For fast inference, we show that the reflow and distillation methods of flow-based models enable few-steps or even one-step molecular conformer generation with high quality. The training techniques proposed in this work show a path towards highly efficient molecular conformer generation with flow-based models.
Zhonglin Cao, Mario Geiger, Allan dos Santos Costa, Danny Reidenbach, Karsten Kreis, Tomas Geffner, Franco Pellegrini, Emine Küçükbenli
ICML7
2022 Neural Network Pruning Denoises the Features and Makes Local Connectivity Emerge in Visual Tasks
abstract
Pruning methods can considerably reduce the size of artificial neural networks without harming their performance and in some cases they can even uncover sub-networks that, when trained in isolation, match or surpass the test accuracy of their dense counterparts. Here, we characterize the inductive bias that pruning imprints in such "winning lottery tickets": focusing on visual tasks, we analyze the architecture resulting from iterative magnitude pruning of a simple fully connected network. We show that the surviving node connectivity is local in input space, and organized in patterns reminiscent of the ones found in convolutional networks. We investigate the role played by data and tasks in shaping the architecture of the pruned sub-network. We find that pruning performances, and the ability to sift out the noise and make local features emerge, improve by increasing the size of the training set, and the semantic value of the data. We also study different pruning procedures, and find that iterative magnitude pruning is particularly effective in distilling meaningful connectivity out of features present in the original task. Our results suggest the possibility to automatically discover new and efficient architectural inductive biases in other datasets and tasks.
Franco Pellegrini, Giulio Biroli
ICML1
2020 An analytic theory of shallow networks dynamics for hinge loss classification
abstract
Neural networks have been shown to perform incredibly well in classification tasks over structured high-dimensional datasets. However, the learning dynamics of such networks is still poorly understood. In this paper we study in detail the training dynamics of a simple type of neural network: a single hidden layer trained to perform a classification task. We show that in a suitable mean-field limit this case maps to a single-node learning problem with a time-dependent dataset determined self-consistently from the average nodes population. We specialize our theory to the prototypical case of a linearly separable dataset and a linear hinge loss, for which the dynamics can be explicitly solved in the infinite dataset limit. This allow us to address in a simple setting several phenomena appearing in modern networks such as slowing down of training dynamics, crossover between feature and lazy learning, and overfitting. Finally, we asses the limitations of mean-field theory by studying the case of large but finite number of nodes and of training samples.
Franco Pellegrini, Giulio Biroli
NeurIPS1