Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Claudio Kozický
dblp:268/1476
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-6663-969XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 67% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational geometry · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › storage management
memory-efficient storage |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Space-Efficient k-d Tree-Based Storage Format for Sparse Tensors · HPDC 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › sparsity exploitation
sparse tensor computation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Space-Efficient k-d Tree-Based Storage Format for Sparse Tensors · HPDC 2020 |
Storage systems › file systems › file organization
storage formats |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Space-Efficient k-d Tree-Based Storage Format for Sparse Tensors · HPDC 2020 |
Computational geometry › spatial data structures
kd-tree |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Space-Efficient k-d Tree-Based Storage Format for Sparse Tensors · HPDC 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
kd-tree · 0.4k-d tree · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | A parallel algorithm for approximating the silhouette using a ball tree
Ivan Simecek, Claudio Kozický |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 2 |
| 2021 | Joint direct and transposed sparse matrix-vector multiplication for multithreaded CPUsabstractAbstract Repeatedly performing sparse matrix‐vector multiplication (SpMV) followed by transposed sparse matrix‐vector multiplication (SpMTV) with the same matrix is a part of several algorithms, for example, the Lanczos biorthogonalization algorithm and the biconjugate gradient method. Such algorithms can benefit from combining parallel SpMV and SpMTV into a single operation we call joint direct and transposed sparse matrix‐vector multiplication (SpMMTV). In this article, we present a parallel SpMMTV algorithm for shared‐memory CPUs. The algorithm uses a sparse matrix format that divides the stored matrix into sparse matrix blocks and compresses the row and column indices of the matrix. This sparse matrix format can be also used for SpMV, SpMTV, and similar sparse matrix‐vector operations. We expand upon existing research by suggesting new variants of the parallel SpMMTV algorithm and by extending the algorithm to efficiently support symmetric matrices. We compare the performance of the presented parallel SpMMTV algorithm with alternative approaches, which use state‐of‐the‐art sparse matrix formats and libraries, using sparse matrices from real‐world applications. The performance results indicate that the median performance of our proposed parallel SpMMTV algorithm is up to 45% higher than of the alternative approaches. Claudio Kozický, Ivan Simecek |
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. | 1 |
| 2020 | Space-Efficient k-d Tree-Based Storage Format for Sparse TensorsabstractComputations with tensors are widespread in many scientific areas. Usually, the used tensors are very large but sparse, i.e., the vast majority of their elements are zero. The space complexity of sparse tensor storage formats varies significantly. For overall efficiency, it is important to reduce the execution time and additional space requirements of the initial preprocessing (i.e., converting tensors from common storage formats to the given internal format). Ivan Simecek, Claudio Kozický, Daniel Langr, Pavel Tvrdík |
HPDC | 2 |