Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bradley Barnhart

dblp:268/1649 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless sensing and localization · 77% Internet of things and sensor networks · 23%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
autoscaling
0.812024
Resource Management in Aurora Serverless · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing
cluster resource management and scheduling
0.812024
Resource Management in Aurora Serverless · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing › virtualization › virtual machine migration
live migration
0.812024
Resource Management in Aurora Serverless · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
0.812024
Resource Management in Aurora Serverless · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing
serverless computing
0.812024
Resource Management in Aurora Serverless · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource allocation
workload allocation
0.812024
Resource Management in Aurora Serverless · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Wireless sensing and localization
backscatter sensing
0.412020
Demo Abstract: RF Soil Moisture Sensing via Radar Backscatter Tags · IPSN 2020
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management
resource oversubscription
0.212024
Resource Management in Aurora Serverless · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing
virtualization
0.212024
Resource Management in Aurora Serverless · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Internet of things and sensor networks
environmental sensing
0.112020
Demo Abstract: RF Soil Moisture Sensing via Radar Backscatter Tags · IPSN 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

token bucket rate regulation · 0.8reactive control · 0.8hierarchical decision-making · 0.8ultra-wideband transceiver · 0.4backscatter tags · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Resource Management in Aurora Serverless
abstract
Amazon Aurora Serverless is an on-demand, autoscaling configuration for Amazon Aurora with full MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility. It automatically offers capacity scale-up/down (i.e., vertical scaling) based on a customer database application's needs. For customers with time-varying workloads, it offers cost savings compared to provisioned Aurora or other alternatives due to its agile and granular scaling and its usage-based charging model. This paper describes the key ideas underlying Aurora Serverless's resource management. To help meet its goals, Aurora Serverless adapts and fine tunes well-established ideas related to resource over-subscription; reactive control informed by recent measurements; distributed & hierarchical decision-making; and innovations in the DB engine, OS, and hypervisor for efficiency. Perhaps the most challenging goal is to offer a consistent resource elasticity experience while operating hosts at high degrees of utilization. Aurora Serverless implements several novel ideas for striking a balance between these opposing needs. Its technique for mapping workloads to hosts ensures that, in the common case, there is adequate spare capacity within a host to support fast scale-up for a workload. In the rare event this is not so, it live migrates workloads to ensure seamless scale-up. Its load distribution strategy is characterized by "unbalancing" of load across hosts to enable agile live migrations. Finally, it employs a token bucket-based rate regulation mechanism to prevent a growing workload from saturating its host faster than live migration-based remedial actions.
Bradley Barnhart, Marc Brooker, Daniil Chinenkov, Tony Hooper, Jihoun Im, Prakash Chandra Jha 0003, Tim Kraska, Ashok Kurakula, Grant Mcalister, Arjun Muthukrishnan, Aravinthan Narayanan, Douglas Terry, Bhuvan Urgaonkar, Jiaming Yan
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2020 Time-of-Flight Soil Moisture Estimation Using RF Backscatter Tags
abstract
Agricultural soil moisture measurement is usually done with extensive in situ sensor deployments. These sensor networks are often difficult to install and maintain. Ground penetrating radars have also been used to do fine-grained moisture measurements in farm fields, but usually require the radar to be in or near contact with the soil. In this paper we propose a hybrid approach that combines an in situ backscatter reflector with an ultra-wideband radar that is small enough to be handheld or mounted to a drone. The underground backscatter reflector allows for accurate time-of-flight measurements. The time-of-flight is determined by the permittivity of the soil, which is influenced primarily by the soil water content for non-saline soils. We performed both laboratory and in situ measurements, achieving an average accuracy within 0.013 cm3/ cm3of the ground truth with a 90th percentile of 0.034 cm3/cm3. This demonstrates the feasibility of our approach.
Colleen Josephson, Bradley Barnhart, Keith Winstein, Sachin Katti, Ranveer Chandra
IGARSS2
2020 Demo Abstract: RF Soil Moisture Sensing via Radar Backscatter Tags
abstract
We present a sensing system that determines soil moisture via RF using backscatter tags paired with a commodity ultra-wideband RF transceiver. Despite decades of research confirming the benefits, soil moisture sensors are still not widely adopted on working farms for three key reasons: the high cost of sensors, the difficulty of deploying and maintaining these sensors, and the lack of reliable internet access in rural areas. We seek to address some of these obstacles by designing a low-cost soil moisture sensing system that uses a hybrid approach of pairing completely wireless backscatter tags with a mobile reader.(p)(/p)We designed and built a backscatter tag prototype and tested our system both in laboratory and in situ at an organic farm field. Our backscatter tag has a projected battery lifetime of up to 15 years on 4xAA batteries, and can operate at a depth of at least 30cm and up to 75cm. It achieves an average accuracy within 0.01-0.03cm3/cm3of the ground truth with a 90th percentile of 0.034cm3/cm3, which is comparable to state-of-the-art commercial soil sensors, at an order of magnitude lower cost.
Colleen Josephson, Bradley Barnhart, Sachin Katti, Keith Winstein, Ranveer Chandra
IPSN2