EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hande Dong
dblp:268/5315
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
2as first author
11since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-0074-2664ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 52% Language models and text generation · 20% Multi-agent systems · 12% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 57% Recommender systems · 43% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program synthesis and code generation · 49% Software maintenance and evolution · 37% Software testing · 15% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | Rethinking Entropy Interventions in RLVR: An Entropy Change Perspective · ACL (1) 2026 ReDit: Reward Dithering for Improved LLM Policy Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
1.2 | 2 | 2026 | ReDit: Reward Dithering for Improved LLM Policy Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 Rethinking Entropy Interventions in RLVR: An Entropy Change Perspective · ACL (1) 2026 |
Recommender systems
debiased recommendation |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2023 AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendation · SIGIR 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regularization for reinforcement learning
entropy regularization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Rethinking Entropy Interventions in RLVR: An Entropy Change Perspective · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AP2O-Coder: Adaptively Progressive Preference Optimization for Reducing Compilation and Runtime Errors in LLM-Generated Code · AAAI 2026 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AP2O-Coder: Adaptively Progressive Preference Optimization for Reducing Compilation and Runtime Errors in LLM-Generated Code · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ReDit: Reward Dithering for Improved LLM Policy Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward shaping |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ReDit: Reward Dithering for Improved LLM Policy Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Visual content generation and editing › vector graphics generation
SVG generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | UniSVG: A Unified Dataset for Vector Graphic Understanding and Generation with Multimodal Large Language Models · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Visual content generation and editing
vector graphics generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | UniSVG: A Unified Dataset for Vector Graphic Understanding and Generation with Multimodal Large Language Models · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Survey of Code Search Based on Deep Learning · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval › code search
semantic code search |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Survey of Code Search Based on Deep Learning · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Software maintenance and evolution
code search |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Survey of Code Search Based on Deep Learning · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2023 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
offline evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On the Equivalence of Decoupled Graph Convolution Network and Label Propagation · WWW 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning › graph-based semi-supervised learning
label propagation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On the Equivalence of Decoupled Graph Convolution Network and Label Propagation · WWW 2021 |
Recommender systems › recommender system evaluation › off-policy evaluation
inverse propensity scoring |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendation · SIGIR 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › agentic AI
agentic reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | ReCreate: Reasoning and Creating Domain Agents Driven by Experience · ACL (1) 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | UniSVG: A Unified Dataset for Vector Graphic Understanding and Generation with Multimodal Large Language Models · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph representation learning
node representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | On the Equivalence of Decoupled Graph Convolution Network and Label Propagation · WWW 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
error notebook · 2.0direct preference optimization · 2.0adaptive replay · 2.0multimodal large language model · 1.7pretraining model · 1.5graph neural network · 1.5deep learning · 1.5reasoning and creation · 1.0policy optimization · 1.0experience replay · 1.0entropy intervention · 1.0random noise perturbation · 0.9GRPO · 0.9survey · 0.7meta-learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | AP2O-Coder: Adaptively Progressive Preference Optimization for Reducing Compilation and Runtime Errors in LLM-Generated CodeabstractLLM's code generation capabilities have yielded substantial improvements in the effectiveness of programming tasks. However, LLM-generated code still suffers from compilation and runtime errors. Existing offline preference optimization methods primarily focus on enhancing LLMs' coding abilities using pass/fail signals in the preference data, overlooking the deep-level error types in the failed codes. To address this, we propose Adaptively Progressive Preference Optimization (AP2O) for coding (i.e., AP2O-Coder), a method that guides LLMs adaptively and methodically to reduce code errors for code generation. Specifically, we construct an error notebook from failed codes and progressively optimize the LLM to correct errors type by type. Furthermore, we adaptively replay error types to tailor to the LLM's evolving weaknesses throughout training. Through extensive experiments on both code and general LLMs (Llama, Qwen, and DeepSeek series) with parameters ranging from 0.5B to 34B, our AP2O-Coder improves code generation performance by up to 3% in pass@k while using less preference data. Jianqing Zhang, Hande Dong, Jian Cao 0001 |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2026 | Rethinking Entropy Interventions in RLVR: An Entropy Change PerspectiveabstractZhezheng Hao, Hong Wang, Haoyang Liu, Jian Luo, Jiarui Yu, Hande Dong, Qiang Lin, Can Wang, Jiawei Chen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Zhezheng Hao, Jiarui Yu, Hande Dong |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2026 | ReCreate: Reasoning and Creating Domain Agents Driven by ExperienceabstractZhezheng Hao, Hong Wang, Jian Luo, Jianqing Zhang, Yuyan Zhou, Qiang Lin, Can Wang, Hande Dong, Jiawei Chen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Zhezheng Hao, Jianqing Zhang, Yuyan Zhou, Hande Dong |
ACL (1) | 8 |
| 2025 | EFIM: Efficient Serving of LLMs for Infilling Tasks with Improved KV Cache Reuse
Tianyu Guo 0009, Hande Dong, Yichong Leng, Cheater Lin, Nong Xiao 0001, Xianwei Zhang 0001 |
Euro-Par (2) | 2 |
| 2025 | UniSVG: A Unified Dataset for Vector Graphic Understanding and Generation with Multimodal Large Language ModelsabstractUnlike bitmap images, scalable vector graphics (SVG) maintain quality when scaled, frequently employed in computer vision and artistic design in the representation of SVG code. In this era of proliferating AI-powered systems, enabling AI to understand and generate SVG has become increasingly urgent. However, AI-driven SVG understanding and generation (U&G) remain significant challenges. SVG code, equivalent to a set of curves and lines controlled by floating-point parameters, demands high precision in SVG U&G. Besides, SVG generation operates under diverse conditional constraints, including textual prompts and visual references, which requires powerful multi-modal processing for condition-to-SVG transformation. Recently, the rapid growth of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated capabilities to process multi-modal inputs and generate complex vector controlling parameters, suggesting the potential to address SVG U&G tasks within a unified model. To unlock MLLM's capabilities in the SVG area, we propose an SVG-centric dataset called UniSVG, comprising 525k data items, tailored for MLLM training and evaluation. To our best knowledge, it is the first comprehensive dataset designed for unified SVG generation (from textual prompts and images) and SVG understanding (color, category, usage, etc.). As expected, learning on the proposed dataset boosts open-source MLLMs' performance on various SVG U&G tasks, surpassing SOTA close-source MLLMs like GPT-4V. We release dataset, benchmark, weights, codes and experiment details on https://ryanlijinke.github.io/. Jiarui Yu, Chenxing Wei, Hande Dong, Liangjing Yang, Zhicai Wang, Yanbin Hao |
ACM Multimedia | 4 |
| 2025 | ReDit: Reward Dithering for Improved LLM Policy OptimizationabstractDeepSeek-R1 has successfully enhanced Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning capabilities through its rule-based reward system. While it's a ''perfect'' reward system that effectively mitigates reward hacking, such reward functions are often discrete. Our experimental observations suggest that discrete rewards can lead to gradient anomaly, unstable optimization, and slow convergence. To address this issue, we propose ReDit (Reward Dithering), a method that dithers the discrete reward signal by adding simple random noise. With this perturbed reward, exploratory gradients are continuously provided throughout the learning process, enabling smoother gradient updates and accelerating convergence. The injected noise also introduces stochasticity into flat reward regions, encouraging the model to explore novel policies and escape local optima. Experiments across diverse tasks demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of ReDit. On average, ReDit achieves performance comparable to vanilla GRPO with only approximately 10% the training steps, and furthermore, still exhibits a 4% performance improvement over vanilla GRPO when trained for a similar duration. Visualizations confirm significant mitigation of gradient issues with ReDit. Moreover, theoretical analyses are provided to further validate these advantages. Chenxing Wei, Jiarui Yu, Ying He 0006, Hande Dong, Yao Shu, F. Richard Yu |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2024 | Improving Code Search with Hard Negative Sampling Based on Fine-tuningabstractPre-trained code models have emerged as the state-of-the-art paradigm for code search tasks. The paradigm involves pre-training the model on search-irrelevant tasks such as masked language modeling, followed by the fine-tuning stage, which focuses on the search-relevant task. The typical fine-tuning method is to employ a dual-encoder architecture to encode semantic embeddings of query and code separately, and then calculate their similarity based on the embeddings. However, the typical dual-encoder architecture falls short in modeling token-level interactions between query and code, which limits the capabilities of model. To address this limitation, we introduce a cross-encoder architecture for code search that jointly encodes the concatenation of query and code. We further introduce a Retriever-Ranker (RR) framework that cascades the dual-encoder and cross-encoder to promote the efficiency of evaluation and online serving. Moreover, we present a ranking-based hard negative sampling (PS) method to improve the ability of cross-encoder to distinguish hard negative codes, which further enhances the cascaded RR framework. Experiments on four datasets using three code models demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method. We have made the code available at https://github.com/DongHande/R2PS. Hande Dong, Jiayi Lin 0004, Yichong Leng |
APSEC | 1 |
| 2024 | Survey of Code Search Based on Deep LearningabstractCode writing is repetitive and predictable, inspiring us to develop various code intelligence techniques. This survey focuses on code search, that is, to retrieve code that matches a given natural language query by effectively capturing the semantic similarity between the query and code. Deep learning, being able to extract complex semantics information, has achieved great success in this field. Recently, various deep learning methods, such as graph neural networks and pretraining models, have been applied to code search with significant progress. Deep learning is now the leading paradigm for code search. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of deep learning-based code search. We review the existing deep learning-based code search framework that maps query/code to vectors and measures their similarity. Furthermore, we propose a new taxonomy to illustrate the state-of-the-art deep learning-based code search in a three-step process: query semantics modeling, code semantics modeling, and matching modeling, which involves the deep learning model training. Finally, we suggest potential avenues for future research in this promising field. Jiayi Lin 0004, Hande Dong, Lei Zhang 0001, Zhonghai Wu |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 3 |
| 2023 | Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future DirectionsabstractWhile recent years have witnessed a rapid growth of research papers on recommender system (RS) , most of the papers focus on inventing machine learning models to better fit user behavior data. However, user behavior data is observational rather than experimental. This makes various biases widely exist in the data, including but not limited to selection bias, position bias, exposure bias, and popularity bias. Blindly fitting the data without considering the inherent biases will result in many serious issues, e.g., the discrepancy between offline evaluation and online metrics, hurting user satisfaction and trust on the recommendation service, and so on. To transform the large volume of research models into practical improvements, it is highly urgent to explore the impacts of the biases and perform debiasing when necessary. When reviewing the papers that consider biases in RS, we find that, to our surprise, the studies are rather fragmented and lack a systematic organization. The terminology “bias” is widely used in the literature, but its definition is usually vague and even inconsistent across papers. This motivates us to provide a systematic survey of existing work on RS biases. In this paper, we first summarize seven types of biases in recommendation, along with their definitions and characteristics. We then provide a taxonomy to position and organize the existing work on recommendation debiasing. Finally, we identify some open challenges and envision some future directions, with the hope of inspiring more research work on this important yet less investigated topic. The summary of debiasing methods reviewed in this survey can be found at https://github.com/jiawei-chen/RecDebiasing . Jiawei Chen 0007, Hande Dong, Xiang Wang 0010, Fuli Feng, Meng Wang 0001, Xiangnan He 0001 |
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. | 2 |
| 2021 | AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for RecommendationabstractRecommender systems rely on user behavior data like ratings and clicks to build personalization model. However, the collected data is observational rather than experimental, causing various biases in the data which significantly affect the learned model. Most existing work for recommendation debiasing, such as the inverse propensity scoring and imputation approaches, focuses on one or two specific biases, lacking the universal capacity that can account for mixed or even unknown biases in the data. Jiawei Chen 0007, Hande Dong, Xiangnan He 0001, Xin Xin 0003, Liang Chen 0001, Guli Lin, Keping Yang |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2021 | On the Equivalence of Decoupled Graph Convolution Network and Label PropagationabstractThe original design of Graph Convolution Network (GCN) couples feature transformation and neighborhood aggregation for node representation learning. Recently, some work shows that coupling is inferior to decoupling, which supports deep graph propagation better and has become the latest paradigm of GCN (e.g., APPNP [16] and SGCN [32]). Despite effectiveness, the working mechanisms of the decoupled GCN are not well understood. Hande Dong, Jiawei Chen 0007, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He 0001, Shuxian Bi, Zhaolin Ding, Peng Cui 0001 |
WWW | 1 |