Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Steffen Czolbe
dblp:268/5388
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-5964-3113ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Time series and sequential data · 29% 3D vision · 20% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 19% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video coding · 50% Image and video processing · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-task generalization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Neuralizer: General Neuroimage Analysis without Re-Training · CVPR 2023 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Neuralizer: General Neuroimage Analysis without Re-Training · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Spot the Difference: Detection of Topological Changes via Geometric Alignment · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
visual anomaly detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Spot the Difference: Detection of Topological Changes via Geometric Alignment · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
perceptual loss |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Loss Function for Generative Neural Networks Based on Watson's Perceptual Model · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Loss Function for Generative Neural Networks Based on Watson's Perceptual Model · NeurIPS 2020 |
Image and video processing › perceptual modeling › visual perception modeling
human visual system model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Loss Function for Generative Neural Networks Based on Watson's Perceptual Model · NeurIPS 2020 |
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
perceptual image quality |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Loss Function for Generative Neural Networks Based on Watson's Perceptual Model · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
medical image segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Neuralizer: General Neuroimage Analysis without Re-Training · CVPR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-task network · 1.3forward-pass inference · 1.3deep learning · 1.3watson perceptual model · 0.9fourier transform · 0.9contrast masking · 0.9deformable registration · 0.5conditional variational autoencoder · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Neuralizer: General Neuroimage Analysis without Re-TrainingabstractNeuroimage processing tasks like segmentation, reconstruction, and registration are central to the study of neuroscience. Robust deep learning strategies and architectures used to solve these tasks are often similar. Yet, when presented with a new task or a dataset with different visual characteristics, practitioners most often need to train a new model, or fine-tune an existing one. This is a time-consuming process that poses a substantial barrier for the thousands of neuroscientists and clinical researchers who often lack the resources or machine-learning expertise to train deep learning models. In practice, this leads to a lack of adoption of deep learning, and neuroscience tools being dominated by classical frameworks. We introduce Neuralizer, a single model that generalizes to previously unseen neuroimaging tasks and modalities without the need for retraining or fine-tuning. Tasks do not have to be known a priori, and generalization happens in a single forward pass during inference. The model can solve processing tasks across multiple image modalities, acquisition methods, and datasets, and generalize to tasks and modalities it has not been trained on. Our experiments on coronal slices show that when few annotated subjects are available, our multi-task network outperforms task-specific baselines without training on the task. Steffen Czolbe, Adrian V. Dalca |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2023 | Semantic similarity metrics for image registrationabstractImage registration aims to find geometric transformations that align images. Most algorithmic and deep learning-based methods solve the registration problem by minimizing a loss function, consisting of a similarity metric comparing the aligned images, and a regularization term ensuring smoothness of the transformation. Existing similarity metrics like Euclidean Distance or Normalized Cross-Correlation focus on aligning pixel intensity values or correlations, giving difficulties with low intensity contrast, noise, and ambiguous matching. We propose a semantic similarity metric for image registration, focusing on aligning image areas based on semantic correspondence instead. Our approach learns dataset-specific features that drive the optimization of a learning-based registration model. We train both an unsupervised approach extracting features with an auto-encoder, and a semi-supervised approach using supplemental segmentation data. We validate the semantic similarity metric using both deep-learning-based and algorithmic image registration methods. Compared to existing methods across four different image modalities and applications, the method achieves consistently high registration accuracy and smooth transformation fields. Steffen Czolbe, Paraskevas Pegios, Oswin Krause, Aasa Feragen |
Medical Image Anal. | 1 |
| 2021 | Spot the Difference: Detection of Topological Changes via Geometric AlignmentabstractGeometric alignment appears in a variety of applications, ranging from domain adaptation, optimal transport, and normalizing flows in machine learning; optical flow and learned augmentation in computer vision and deformable registration within biomedical imaging. A recurring challenge is the alignment of domains whose topology is not the same; a problem that is routinely ignored, potentially introducing bias in downstream analysis. As a first step towards solving such alignment problems, we propose an unsupervised algorithm for the detection of changes in image topology. The model is based on a conditional variational auto-encoder and detects topological changes between two images during the registration step. We account for both topological changes in the image under spatial variation and unexpected transformations. Our approach is validated on two tasks and datasets: detection of topological changes in microscopy images of cells, and unsupervised anomaly detection brain imaging. Steffen Czolbe, Aasa Feragen, Oswin Krause |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | A Loss Function for Generative Neural Networks Based on Watson's Perceptual ModelabstractTo train Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) to generate realistic imagery requires a loss function that reflects human perception of image similarity. We propose such a loss function based on Watson's perceptual model, which computes a weighted distance in frequency space and accounts for luminance and contrast masking. We extend the model to color images, increase its robustness to translation by using the Fourier Transform, remove artifacts due to splitting the image into blocks, and make it differentiable. In experiments, VAEs trained with the new loss function generated realistic, high-quality image samples. Compared to using the Euclidean distance and the Structural Similarity Index, the images were less blurry; compared to deep neural network based losses, the new approach required less computational resources and generated images with less artifacts. Steffen Czolbe, Oswin Krause, Ingemar J. Cox, Christian Igel |
NeurIPS | 1 |