EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Giovanni Franzese
dblp:268/5679
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9863-0291ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot manipulation · 54% Motion planning and robot control · 26% Reinforcement learning · 20% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generalizable Motion Policies Through Keypoint Parameterization and Transportation Maps · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › generalization in reinforcement learning
policy generalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generalizable Motion Policies Through Keypoint Parameterization and Transportation Maps · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generalizable Motion Policies Through Keypoint Parameterization and Transportation Maps · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › medical robotics
assistive dressing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Do You Need a Hand? - A Bimanual Robotic Dressing Assistance Scheme · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › service robot
assistive robotics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Do You Need a Hand? - A Bimanual Robotic Dressing Assistance Scheme · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Human-robot interaction
physical human-robot interaction |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Do You Need a Hand? - A Bimanual Robotic Dressing Assistance Scheme · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimal strategy · 1.5dressing coordinate encoding · 1.5ablation study · 1.5nonlinear transformation fitting · 0.9gaussian process · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Generalizable Motion Policies Through Keypoint Parameterization and Transportation MapsabstractLearning from Interactive Demonstrations has revolutionized the way non-expert humans teach robots. It is enough to kinesthetically move the robot around to teach pick-and-place, dressing, or cleaning policies. However, the main challenge is correctly generalizing to novel situations, e.g., different surfaces to clean or different arm postures to dress. This article proposes a novel task parameterization and generalization to transport the original robot policy, i.e., position, velocity, orientation, and stiffness. Unlike the state of the art, only a set of keypoints is tracked during the demonstration and the execution, e.g., a point cloud of the surface to clean. We then propose to fit a nonlinear transformation that would deform the space and then the original policy using the paired source and target point sets. The use of function approximators like Gaussian Processes allows us to generalize, or transport, the policy from every space location while estimating the uncertainty of the resulting policy due to the limited task keypoints and the reduced number of demonstrations. We compare the algorithm's performance with state-of-the-art task parameterization alternatives and analyze the effect of different function approximators. We also validated the algorithm on robot manipulation tasks, i.e., different posture arm dressing, different location product reshelving, and different shape surface cleaning. A video of the experiments can be found here:https://youtu.be/bE6uOnAQBLo. Giovanni Franzese, Ravi Prakash 0002, Cosimo Della Santina, Jens Kober |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 1 |
| 2024 | A Unifying Variational Framework for Gaussian Process Motion PlanningabstractTo control how a robot moves, motion planning algorithms must compute paths in high-dimensional state spaces while accounting for physical constraints related to motors and joints, generating smooth and stable motions, avoiding obstacles, and preventing collisions. A motion planning algorithm must therefore balance competing demands, and should ideally incorporate uncertainty to handle noise, model errors, and facilitate deployment in complex environments. To address these issues, we introduce a framework for robot motion planning based on variational Gaussian processes, which unifies and generalizes various probabilistic-inference-based motion planning algorithms, and connects them with optimization-based planners. Our framework provides a principled and flexible way to incorporate equality-based, inequality-based, and soft motion-planning constraints during end-to-end training, is straightforward to implement, and provides both interval-based and Monte-Carlo-based uncertainty estimates. We conduct experiments using different environments and robots, comparing against baseline approaches based on the feasibility of the planned paths, and obstacle avoidance quality. Results show that our proposed approach yields a good balance between success rates and path quality. Lucas Cosier, Rares Iordan, Sicelukwanda Zwane, Giovanni Franzese, James T. Wilson, Marc Peter Deisenroth, Alexander Terenin, Yasemin Bekiroglu |
AISTATS | 4 |
| 2024 | Learning Multi-Reference Frame Skills from Demonstration with Task-Parameterized Gaussian ProcessesabstractA central challenge in Learning from Demonstration is to generate representations that are adaptable and can generalize to unseen situations. This work proposes to learn such a representation without using task-specific heuristics within the context of multi-reference frame skill learning by superimposing local skills in the global frame. Local policies are first learned by fitting the relative skills with respect to each frame using Gaussian Processes (GPs). Then, another GP, which determines the relevance of each frame for every time step, is trained in a self-supervised manner from a different batch of demonstrations. The uncertainty quantification capability of GPs is exploited to stabilize the local policies and to train the frame relevance in a fully Bayesian way. We validate the method through a dataset of multi-frame tasks generated in simulation and on real-world experiments with a robotic manipulation pick-and-place re-shelving task.We evaluate the performance of our method with two metrics: how close the generated trajectories get to each of the task goals and the deviation between these trajectories and test expert trajectories. According to both of these metrics, the proposed method consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline, Task-Parameterised Gaussian Mixture Model (TPGMM). Mariano Ramírez Montero, Giovanni Franzese, Jens Kober, Cosimo Della Santina |
IROS | 2 |
| 2024 | Do You Need a Hand? - A Bimanual Robotic Dressing Assistance SchemeabstractDeveloping physically assistive robots capable of dressing assistance has the potential to significantly improve the lives of the elderly and disabled population. However, most robotics dressing strategies considered a single robot only, which greatly limited the performance of the dressing assistance. In fact, healthcare professionals perform the task bimanually. Inspired by them, we propose a bimanual cooperative scheme for robotic dressing assistance. In the scheme, an interactive robot joins hands with the human thus supporting/guiding the human in the dressing process, while the dressing robot performs the dressing task. We identify a key feature: elbow angle that affects the dressing action and propose an optimal strategy for the interactive robot using the feature. A dressing coordinate based on the posture of the arm is defined to better encode the dressing policy. We validate the interactive dressing scheme with extensive experiments and also an ablation study. The experiment video is available onhttps://sites.google.com/view/bimanualassitdressing/home Jihong Zhu 0002, Michael Gienger, Giovanni Franzese, Jens Kober |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 3 |
| 2021 | ILoSA: Interactive Learning of Stiffness and AttractorsabstractTeaching robots how to apply forces according to our preferences is still an open challenge that has to be tackled from multiple engineering perspectives. This paper studies how to learn variable impedance policies where both the Cartesian stiffness and the attractor can be learned from human demonstrations and corrections with a user-friendly interface. The presented framework, named ILoSA, uses Gaussian Processes for policy learning, identifying regions of uncertainty and allowing interactive corrections, stiffness modulation and active disturbance rejection. The experimental evaluation of the framework is carried out on a Franka-Emika Panda in four separate cases with unique force interaction properties: 1) pulling a plug wherein a sudden force discontinuity occurs upon successful removal of the plug, 2) pushing a box where a sustained force is required to keep the robot in motion, 3) wiping a whiteboard in which the force is applied perpendicular to the direction of movement, and 4) inserting a plug to verify the usability for precision-critical tasks in an experimental validation performed with non-expert users. Giovanni Franzese, Anna Mészáros, Luka Peternel, Jens Kober |
IROS | 1 |
| 2021 | Interactive Learning of Sensor Policy FusionabstractTeaching a robot how to navigate in a new environment only from the sensor input in an end-to-end fashion is still an open challenge with much attention from industry and academia. This paper proposes an algorithm with the name “Learning Interactively to Resolve Ambiguity” (LIRA) that tackles the problem of sensor policy fusion extending state- of-the-art methods by employing ambiguity awareness in the decision-making and solving it using active and interactive querying of the human expert. LIRA, in fact, employs Gaussian Processes for the estimation of the policy’s confidence and investigates the ambiguity due to the disagreement between the single sensor policies on the desired action to take. LIRA aims to make the teaching of new policies easier, learning from human demonstrations and correction.The experiments show that LIRA can be used for learning a sensor-fused policy from scratch or also leveraging the knowledge of existing single sensor policies. The experiments focus on the estimation of the human interventions required for teaching a successful navigation policy. Bart Bootsma, Giovanni Franzese, Jens Kober |
RO-MAN | 2 |