Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rakshit Naidu

dblp:268/5808 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Efficient and distributed learning · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.612022
Pruning has a disparate impact on model accuracy · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fair optimization
fairness-aware pruning
0.612022
Pruning has a disparate impact on model accuracy · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.612022
Pruning has a disparate impact on model accuracy · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.612022
Pruning has a disparate impact on model accuracy · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient norm analysis · 0.6decision boundary analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Pruning has a disparate impact on model accuracy
abstract
Network pruning is a widely-used compression technique that is able to significantly scale down overparameterized models with minimal loss of accuracy. This paper shows that pruning may create or exacerbate disparate impacts. The paper sheds light on the factors to cause such disparities, suggesting differences in gradient norms and distance to decision boundary across groups to be responsible for this critical issue. It analyzes these factors in detail, providing both theoretical and empirical support, and proposes a simple, yet effective, solution that mitigates the disparate impacts caused by pruning.
Cuong Tran 0007, Ferdinando Fioretto, Jung-Eun Kim, Rakshit Naidu
NeurIPS4