Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eliahu Horwitz
dblp:268/8318
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 17% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 17% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software maintenance and evolution · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 87% Geometric modeling and processing · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
software ecosystems |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Unsupervised Model Tree Heritage Recovery · ICLR 2025 We Should Chart an Atlas of All the World's Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
model provenance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unsupervised Model Tree Heritage Recovery · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
model search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning on Model Weights using Tree Experts · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
probing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep Linear Probe Generators for Weight Space Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
weight space learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep Linear Probe Generators for Weight Space Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
model stealing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Recovering the Pre-Fine-Tuning Weights of Generative Models · ICML 2024 |
Visual content generation and editing
image editing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Image Shape Manipulation from a Single Augmented Training Sample · ICCV 2021 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software ecosystems
model reuse |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | We Should Chart an Atlas of All the World's Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › network design
minimum directed spanning tree |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Unsupervised Model Tree Heritage Recovery · ICLR 2025 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape representation
primitive-based representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Image Shape Manipulation from a Single Augmented Training Sample · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
directed minimum spanning tree · 2.6spectral decomposition · 1.5LoRA fine-tuning · 1.5weight-language embedding · 0.9tree expert · 0.9linear probing · 0.9deep linear probe generators · 0.9thin-plate-spline augmentation · 0.5generative model · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning on Model Weights using Tree ExpertsabstractThe number of publicly available models is rapidly increasing, yet most remain undocumented. Users looking for suitable models for their tasks must first determine what each model does. Training machine learning models to infer missing documentation directly from model weights is challenging, as these weights often contain significant variation unrelated to model functionality (denoted nuisance). Here, we identify a key property of real-world models: most public models belong to a small set of Model Trees, where all models within a tree are fine-tuned from a common ancestor (e.g., a foundation model). Importantly, we find that within each tree there is less nuisance variation between models. Concretely, while learning across Model Trees requires complex architectures, even a linear classifier trained on a single model layer often works within trees. While effective, these linear classifiers are computationally expensive, especially when dealing with larger models that have many parameters. To address this, we introduce Probing Experts (ProbeX), a theoretically motivated and lightweight method. Notably, ProbeX is the first probing method specifically designed to learn from the weights of a single hidden model layer. We demonstrate the effectiveness of ProbeX by predicting the categories in a model’s training dataset based only on its weights. Excitingly, ProbeX can map the weights of Stable Diffusion into a weight-language embedding space, enabling model search via text, i.e., zero-shot model classification. Eliahu Horwitz, Bar Cavia, Jonathan Kahana, Yedid Hoshen |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2025 | Unsupervised Model Tree Heritage RecoveryabstractThe number of models shared online has recently skyrocketed, with over one million public models available on Hugging Face. Sharing models allows other users to build on existing models, using them as initialization for fine-tuning, improving accuracy, and saving compute and energy. However, it also raises important intellectual property issues, as fine-tuning may violate the license terms of the original model or that of its training data. A Model Tree, i.e., a tree data structure rooted at a foundation model and having directed edges between a parent model and other models directly fine-tuned from it (children), would settle such disputes by making the model heritage explicit. Unfortunately, current models are not well documented, with most model metadata (e.g., "model cards") not providing accurate information about heritage. In this paper, we introduce the task of Unsupervised Model Tree Heritage Recovery (Unsupervised MoTHer Recovery) for collections of neural networks. For each pair of models, this task requires: i) determining if they are directly related, and ii) establishing the direction of the relationship. Our hypothesis is that model weights encode this information, the challenge is to decode the underlying tree structure given the weights. We discover several properties of model weights that allow us to perform this task. By using these properties, we formulate the MoTHer Recovery task as finding a directed minimal spanning tree. In extensive experiments we demonstrate that our method successfully reconstructs complex Model Trees. Eliahu Horwitz, Asaf Shul, Yedid Hoshen |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Deep Linear Probe Generators for Weight Space LearningabstractWeight space learning aims to extract information about a neural network, such as its training dataset or generalization error. Recent approaches learn directly from model weights, but this presents many challenges as weights are high-dimensional and include permutation symmetries between neurons. An alternative approach, Probing, represents a model by passing a set of learned inputs (probes) through the model, and training a predictor on top of the corresponding outputs. Although probing is typically not used as a stand alone approach, our preliminary experiment found that a vanilla probing baseline worked surprisingly well. However, we discover that current probe learning strategies are ineffective. We therefore propose Deep Linear Probe Generators (ProbeGen), a simple and effective modification to probing approaches. ProbeGen adds a shared generator module with a deep linear architecture, providing an inductive bias towards structured probes thus reducing overfitting. While simple, ProbeGen performs significantly better than the state-of-the-art and is very efficient, requiring between 30 to 1000 times fewer FLOPs than other top approaches. Jonathan Kahana, Eliahu Horwitz, Imri Shuval, Yedid Hoshen |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | We Should Chart an Atlas of All the World's ModelsabstractPublic model repositories now contain millions of models, yet most remain undocumented and effectively lost: their capabilities, provenance, and constraints cannot be reliably determined. As a result, the field wastes training time and compute, propagates hidden biases, faces intellectual-property risks, and misses opportunities for model reuse and transfer. In this position paper, we advocate charting the world's model population in a unified structure we call the Model Atlas: a graph that captures models, their attributes, and the weight transformations connecting them. The Model Atlas enables applications in model forensics, meta-ML research, and model discovery, challenging tasks given today's unstructured model repositories. However, because most models lack documentation, large atlas regions remain uncharted. Addressing this gap motivates new machine learning methods that treat models themselves as data and infer properties such as functionality, performance, and lineage directly from their weights. We argue that a scalable path forward is to bypass the unique parameter symmetries that plague model weights. Charting all the world's models will require a community effort, and we hope its broad utility will rally researchers toward this goal. Eliahu Horwitz, Nitzan Kurer, Jonathan Kahana, Liel Amar, Yedid Hoshen |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Recovering the Pre-Fine-Tuning Weights of Generative ModelsabstractThe dominant paradigm in generative modeling consists of two steps: i) pre-training on a large-scale but unsafe dataset, ii) aligning the pre-trained model with human values via fine-tuning. This practice is considered safe, as no current method can recover the unsafe, pre-fine-tuning model weights. In this paper, we demonstrate that this assumption is often false. Concretely, we present Spectral DeTuning, a method that can recover the weights of the pre-fine-tuning model using a few low-rank (LoRA) fine-tuned models. In contrast to previous attacks that attempt to recover pre-fine-tuning capabilities, our method aims to recover the exact pre-fine-tuning weights. Our approach exploits this new vulnerability against large-scale models such as a personalized Stable Diffusion and an aligned Mistral. The code is available at https://vision.huji.ac.il/spectral_detuning/. Eliahu Horwitz, Jonathan Kahana, Yedid Hoshen |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Image Shape Manipulation from a Single Augmented Training SampleabstractIn this paper, we present DeepSIM, a generative model for conditional image manipulation based on a single image. We find that extensive augmentation is key for enabling single image training, and incorporate the use of thin-plate-spline (TPS) as an effective augmentation. Our network learns to map between a primitive representation of the image to the image itself. The choice of a primitive representation has an impact on the ease and expressiveness of the manipulations and can be automatic (e.g. edges), manual (e.g. segmentation) or hybrid such as edges on top of segmentations. At manipulation time, our generator allows for making complex image changes by modifying the primitive input representation and mapping it through the network. Our method is shown to achieve remarkable performance on image manipulation tasks. Yael Vinker, Eliahu Horwitz, Nir Zabari, Yedid Hoshen |
ICCV | 2 |