Deep learning models are often trained on distributed, web-scale datasets crawled from the internet. In this paper, we introduce two new dataset poisoning attacks that intentionally introduce malicious examples to a model’s performance. Our attacks are immediately practical and could, today, poison 10 popular datasets. Our first attack, split-view poisoning, exploits the mutable nature of internet content to ensure a dataset annotator’s initial view of the dataset differs from the view downloaded by subsequent clients. By exploiting specific invalid trust assumptions, we show how we could have poisoned 0.01% of the LAION-400M or COYO-700M datasets for just $60 USD. Our second attack, frontrunning poisoning, targets web-scale datasets that periodically snapshot crowd-sourced content—such as Wikipedia—where an attacker only needs a time-limited window to inject malicious examples. In light of both attacks, we notify the maintainers of each affected dataset and recommended several low-overhead defenses.

Recent work by Jia et al. [1], showed the possibility of effectively computing pairwise model distances in weight space, using a model explanation technique known as LIME. This method requires query-only access to the two models under examination. We argue this insight can be leveraged by an adversary to reduce the net cost (number of queries) of launching an evasion campaign against a deployed model. We show that there is a strong negative correlation between the success rate of adversarial transfer and the distance between the victim model and the surrogate used to generate the evasive samples. Thus, we propose and evaluate a method to reduce adversarial costs by finding the closest surrogate model for adversarial transfer.