Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Severine Durand
dblp:269/0329
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information theory › information measures › information decomposition
partial information decomposition |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gaussian Partial Information Decomposition: Bias Correction and Application to High-dimensional Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multivariate gaussian estimation · 1.3bias correction · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Gaussian Partial Information Decomposition: Bias Correction and Application to High-dimensional DataabstractRecent advances in neuroscientific experimental techniques have enabled us to simultaneously record the activity of thousands of neurons across multiple brain regions. This has led to a growing need for computational tools capable of analyzing how task-relevant information is represented and communicated between several brain regions. Partial information decompositions (PIDs) have emerged as one such tool, quantifying how much unique, redundant and synergistic information two or more brain regions carry about a task-relevant message. However, computing PIDs is computationally challenging in practice, and statistical issues such as the bias and variance of estimates remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose a new method for efficiently computing and estimating a PID definition on multivariate Gaussian distributions. We show empirically that our method satisfies an intuitive additivity property, and recovers the ground truth in a battery of canonical examples, even at high dimensionality. We also propose and evaluate, for the first time, a method to correct the bias in PID estimates at finite sample sizes. Finally, we demonstrate that our Gaussian PID effectively characterizes inter-areal interactions in the mouse brain, revealing higher redundancy between visual areas when a stimulus is behaviorally relevant. Praveen Venkatesh, Corbett Bennett, Samuel D. Gale, Tamina K. Ramirez, Greggory Heller, Severine Durand, Shawn R. Olsen, Stefan Mihalas |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2018 | Visual physiology of the layer 4 cortical circuit in silicoabstractDespite advances in experimental techniques and accumulation of large datasets concerning the composition and properties of the cortex, quantitative modeling of cortical circuits under in-vivo-like conditions remains challenging. Here we report and publicly release a biophysically detailed circuit model of layer 4 in the mouse primary visual cortex, receiving thalamo-cortical visual inputs. The 45,000-neuron model was subjected to a battery of visual stimuli, and results were compared to published work and new in vivo experiments. Simulations reproduced a variety of observations, including effects of optogenetic perturbations. Critical to the agreement between responses in silico and in vivo were the rules of functional synaptic connectivity between neurons. Interestingly, after extreme simplification the model still performed satisfactorily on many measurements, although quantitative agreement with experiments suffered. These results emphasize the importance of functional rules of cortical wiring and enable a next generation of data-driven models of in vivo neural activity and computations. Anton Arkhipov, Nathan W. Gouwens, Yazan N. Billeh, Sergey L. Gratiy, Ramakrishnan Iyer, Ziqiang Wei, Reza Abbasi-Asl, Jim Berg, Michael A. Buice, Nicholas Cain, Nuno daCosta, Saskia C. J. De Vries, Daniel Denman, Severine Durand, David Feng 0001, Tim Jarsky, Jérôme A. Lecoq, Stefan Mihalas, Gabriel Koch Ocker, Shawn R. Olsen, R. Clay Reid, Gilberto Soler-Llavina, Staci A. Sorensen, Quanxin Wang, Jack Waters, Massimo Scanziani, Christof Koch |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 15 |