Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dayanne M. Castro
dblp:269/1043
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology
cell-type-specific network inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | High-performance single-cell gene regulatory network inference at scale: the Inferelator 3.0 · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | High-performance single-cell gene regulatory network inference at scale: the Inferelator 3.0 · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-cell analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | High-performance single-cell gene regulatory network inference at scale: the Inferelator 3.0 · Bioinform. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regression · 0.6machine learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | High-performance single-cell gene regulatory network inference at scale: the Inferelator 3.0abstractMOTIVATION: Gene regulatory networks define regulatory relationships between transcription factors and target genes within a biological system, and reconstructing them is essential for understanding cellular growth and function. Methods for inferring and reconstructing networks from genomics data have evolved rapidly over the last decade in response to advances in sequencing technology and machine learning. The scale of data collection has increased dramatically; the largest genome-wide gene expression datasets have grown from thousands of measurements to millions of single cells, and new technologies are on the horizon to increase to tens of millions of cells and above. RESULTS: In this work, we present the Inferelator 3.0, which has been significantly updated to integrate data from distinct cell types to learn context-specific regulatory networks and aggregate them into a shared regulatory network, while retaining the functionality of the previous versions. The Inferelator is able to integrate the largest single-cell datasets and learn cell-type-specific gene regulatory networks. Compared to other network inference methods, the Inferelator learns new and informative Saccharomyces cerevisiae networks from single-cell gene expression data, measured by recovery of a known gold standard. We demonstrate its scaling capabilities by learning networks for multiple distinct neuronal and glial cell types in the developing Mus musculus brain at E18 from a large (1.3 million) single-cell gene expression dataset with paired single-cell chromatin accessibility data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The inferelator software is available on GitHub (https://github.com/flatironinstitute/inferelator) under the MIT license and has been released as python packages with associated documentation (https://inferelator.readthedocs.io/). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Claudia Skok Gibbs, Christopher A. Jackson, Giuseppe-Antonio Saldi, Andreas Tjärnberg, Aashna Shah, Aaron Watters, Nicholas De Veaux, Konstantine Tchourine, Ren Yi, Tymor Hamamsy, Dayanne M. Castro, Nicholas Carriero, Bram L. Gorissen, David Gresham, Emily R. Miraldi, Richard Bonneau |
Bioinform. | 11 |
| 2019 | Multi-study inference of regulatory networks for more accurate models of gene regulationabstractGene regulatory networks are composed of sub-networks that are often shared across biological processes, cell-types, and organisms. Leveraging multiple sources of information, such as publicly available gene expression datasets, could therefore be helpful when learning a network of interest. Integrating data across different studies, however, raises numerous technical concerns. Hence, a common approach in network inference, and broadly in genomics research, is to separately learn models from each dataset and combine the results. Individual models, however, often suffer from under-sampling, poor generalization and limited network recovery. In this study, we explore previous integration strategies, such as batch-correction and model ensembles, and introduce a new multitask learning approach for joint network inference across several datasets. Our method initially estimates the activities of transcription factors, and subsequently, infers the relevant network topology. As regulatory interactions are context-dependent, we estimate model coefficients as a combination of both dataset-specific and conserved components. In addition, adaptive penalties may be used to favor models that include interactions derived from multiple sources of prior knowledge including orthogonal genomics experiments. We evaluate generalization and network recovery using examples from Bacillus subtilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and show that sharing information across models improves network reconstruction. Finally, we demonstrate robustness to both false positives in the prior information and heterogeneity among datasets. Dayanne M. Castro, Nicholas R. de Veaux, Emily R. Miraldi, Richard Bonneau |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |