Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhengyan Fu
dblp:269/3927
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 67% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | HonestLLM: Toward an Honest and Helpful Large Language Model · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language model analysis
uncertainty expression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | HonestLLM: Toward an Honest and Helpful Large Language Model · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
curriculum learning · 0.8curiosity-driven prompting · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | HonestLLM: Toward an Honest and Helpful Large Language ModelabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across various industries and applications, owing to their exceptional generative capabilities. Nevertheless, honesty and helpfulness, which ensure safe and useful real-world deployments, have been considered as the longstanding cornerstones in practice. In this paper, we first established comprehensive principles for honesty LLM and further created the HoneSet with 930 queries across six categories, which is designed to evaluate LLMs’ ability to maintain honesty. Then, we improved the honesty and helpfulness of LLMs in both training-free and fine-tuning settings. Specifically, we propose a training-free method named Curiosity-Driven Prompting, which enables LLMs to express their internal confusion and uncertainty about the given query and then optimize their responses. Moreover, we also propose a two-stage fine-tuning approach, inspired by curriculum learning, to enhance the honesty and helpfulness of LLMs. The method first teaches LLMs to distinguish between honest and dishonest, and then LLMs are trained to learn to respond more helpfully. Experimental results demonstrated that both of the two proposed methods improve the helpfulness of LLMs while making them maintain honesty. Our research has paved the way for more reliable and trustworthy LLMs in real-world applications. Chujie Gao, Siyuan Wu 0001, Yue Huang 0001, Dongping Chen, Qihui Zhang, Zhengyan Fu, Yao Wan 0001, Lichao Sun 0001, Xiangliang Zhang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 6 |