Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pablo Badilla

dblp:269/4605 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 89% Representation and self-supervised learning · 11%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
1.322025
WEFE: A Python Library for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Word Embeddings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
WEFE: The Word Embeddings Fairness Evaluation Framework · IJCAI 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias detection and mitigation
0.912025
WEFE: A Python Library for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Word Embeddings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness in NLP
bias in word embeddings
0.912025
WEFE: A Python Library for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Word Embeddings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Computational science and engineering › statistical computing
statistical software
0.912025
WEFE: A Python Library for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Word Embeddings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias evaluation
0.412020
WEFE: The Word Embeddings Fairness Evaluation Framework · IJCAI 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding
0.412020
WEFE: The Word Embeddings Fairness Evaluation Framework · IJCAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fairness metrics · 2.2bias mitigation methods · 1.7correlation analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 WEFE: A Python Library for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Word Embeddings
abstract
Word embeddings, which are a mapping of words into continuous vectors, are widely used in modern Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems. However, they are prone to inherit stereotypical social biases from the corpus on which they are built. The research community has focused on two main tasks to address this problem: 1) how to measure these biases, and 2) how to mitigate them. Word Embedding Fairness Evaluation (WEFE) is an open source library that implements many fairness metrics and mitigation methods in a unified framework. It also provides a standard interface for designing new ones. The software follows the object-oriented paradigm with a strong focus on extensibility. Each of its methods is appropriately documented, verified and tested. WEFE is not limited to just a library: it also contains several replications of previous studies as well as tutorials that serve as educational material for newcomers to the field. It is licensed under BSD-3 and can be easily installed through pip and conda package managers.
Pablo Badilla, Felipe Bravo-Marquez, María José Zambrano, Jorge Pérez 0001
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2020 WEFE: The Word Embeddings Fairness Evaluation Framework
abstract
Word embeddings are known to exhibit stereotypical biases towards gender, race, religion, among other criteria. Severa fairness metrics have been proposed in order to automatically quantify these biases. Although all metrics have a similar objective, the relationship between them is by no means clear. Two issues that prevent a clean comparison is that they operate with different inputs, and that their outputs are incompatible with each other. In this paper we propose WEFE, the word embeddings fairness evaluation framework, to encapsulate, evaluate and compare fairness metrics. Our framework needs a list of pre-trained embeddings and a set of fairness criteria, and it is based on checking correlations between fairness rankings induced by these criteria. We conduct a case study showing that rankings produced by existing fairness methods tend to correlate when measuring gender bias. This correlation is considerably less for other biases like race or religion. We also compare the fairness rankings with an embedding benchmark showing that there is no clear correlation between fairness and good performance in downstream tasks.
Pablo Badilla, Felipe Bravo-Marquez, Jorge Pérez 0001
IJCAI1