Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shawn Li

dblp:269/5241 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 78% Language models and text generation · 9% Representation and self-supervised learning · 8%
Network and information security
2 papers
Security and privacy of machine learning · 54% Systems and software security · 46%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial defense
prompt injection defense
1.012026
Defenses Against Prompt Attacks Learn Surface Heuristics · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › out-of-distribution detection
multimodal out-of-distribution detection
0.912025
DPU: Dynamic Prototype Updating for Multimodal Out-of-Distribution Detection · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection
0.912025
DPU: Dynamic Prototype Updating for Multimodal Out-of-Distribution Detection · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
DPU: Dynamic Prototype Updating for Multimodal Out-of-Distribution Detection · CVPR 2025
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
lesion detection
0.712023
An end-to-end multi-task system of automatic lesion detection and anatomical localization in whole-body bone scintigraphy by deep learning · Bioinform. 2023
Medical and health informatics
medical imaging
0.712023
An end-to-end multi-task system of automatic lesion detection and anatomical localization in whole-body bone scintigraphy by deep learning · Bioinform. 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › trustworthy language model
large language model security
0.312026
Defenses Against Prompt Attacks Learn Surface Heuristics · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
prototype learning
0.312025
DPU: Dynamic Prototype Updating for Multimodal Out-of-Distribution Detection · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.212023
An end-to-end multi-task system of automatic lesion detection and anatomical localization in whole-body bone scintigraphy by deep learning · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised fine-tuning · 2.0semi-supervised learning · 1.3multi-atlas segmentation · 1.3deep learning · 1.3dynamic prototype updating · 0.9class center representation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Defenses Against Prompt Attacks Learn Surface Heuristics
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in security-sensitive applications, where they must follow system-or developer-specified instructions that define the intended task behavior, while completing benign user requests.When adversarial instructions appear in user queries or externally retrieved content, models may override intended logic.Recent defenses rely on supervised finetuning with benign and malicious labels.Although these methods achieve high attack rejection rates, we find that they rely on narrow correlations in defense data rather than harmful intent, leading to systematic rejection of safe inputs.We analyze three recurring shortcut behaviors induced by defense fine-tuning.Position bias arises when benign content placed later in a prompt is rejected at much higher rates; across reasoning benchmarks, suffix-task rejection rises from below 10% to as high as 90%.Token trigger bias occurs when strings common in attack data raise rejection probability even in benign contexts; inserting a single trigger token increases false refusals by up to 50%.Topic generalization bias reflects poor generalization beyond the defense data distribution, with defended models suffering test-time accuracy drops of up to 40%.These findings suggest that current prompt-injection defenses frequently respond to attack-like surface patterns rather than the underlying intent.We introduce controlled diagnostic datasets and a systematic evaluation across two base models and multiple defense pipelines, highlighting limitations of supervised fine-tuning for reliable LLM security.
Shawn Li, Chenxiao Yu, Zhiyu Ni, Charith Peris, Chaowei Xiao
ACL (1)1
2025 DPU: Dynamic Prototype Updating for Multimodal Out-of-Distribution Detection
abstract
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is crucial for ensuring the robustness of machine learning models by identifying samples that deviate from the training distribution. While traditional OOD detection has predominantly focused on single-modality inputs, such as images, recent advancements in multimodal models have shown the potential of utilizing multiple modalities (e.g., video, optical flow, audio) to improve detection performance. However, existing approaches often neglect intra-class variability within in-distribution (ID) data, assuming that samples of the same class are perfectly cohesive and consistent. This assumption can lead to performance degradation, especially when prediction discrepancies are indiscriminately amplified across all samples. To address this issue, we propose Dynamic Prototype Updating (DPU), a novel plug-and-play framework for multimodal OOD detection that accounts for intra-class variations. Our method dynamically updates class center representations for each class by measuring the variance of similar samples within each batch, enabling tailored adjustments. This approach allows us to intensify prediction discrepancies based on the updated class centers, thereby enhancing the model’s robustness and generalization across different modalities. Extensive experiments on two tasks, five datasets, and nine base OOD algorithms demonstrate that DPU significantly improves OOD detection performances, setting a new state-of-the-art in multimodal OOD detection, including improvements up to 80% in Far-OOD detection. To improve accessibility and reproducibility, our code is released at https://github.com/lili0415/DPU-OOD-Detection.
Shawn Li, Huixian Gong, Hao Dong 0011, Tiankai Yang 0001, Zhengzhong Tu, Yue Zhao 0016
CVPR1
2025 Secure On-Device Video OOD Detection without Backpropagation
Shawn Li, Peilin Cai, Yuxiao Zhou 0006, Zhiyu Ni, Renjie Liang, You Qin, Yi Nian, Zhengzhong Tu, Xiyang Hu, Yue Zhao 0016
ICCV1
2023 An end-to-end multi-task system of automatic lesion detection and anatomical localization in whole-body bone scintigraphy by deep learning
abstract
SUMMARY: Limited by spatial resolution and visual contrast, bone scintigraphy interpretation is susceptible to subjective factors, which considerably affects the accuracy and repeatability of lesion detection and anatomical localization. In this work, we design and implement an end-to-end multi-task deep learning model to perform automatic lesion detection and anatomical localization in whole-body bone scintigraphy. A total of 617 whole-body bone scintigraphy cases including anterior and posterior views were retrospectively analyzed. The proposed semi-supervised model consists of two task flows. The first one, the lesion segmentation flow, received image patches and was trained in a supervised way. The other one, skeleton segmentation flow, was trained on as few as five labeled images in conjunction with the multi-atlas approach, in a semi-supervised way. The two flows joint in their encoder layers so each flow can capture more generalized distribution of the sample space and extract more abstract deep features. The experimental results show that the architecture achieved the highest precision in the finest bone segmentation task in both anterior and posterior images of whole-body scintigraphy. Such an end-to-end approach with very few manual annotation requirement would be suitable for algorithm deployment. Moreover, the proposed approach reliably balances unsupervised labels construction and supervised learning, providing useful insight for weakly labeled image analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Kaibin Huang, Shengyun Huang, Guojing Chen, Shawn Li
Bioinform.5