Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhanyu Wu

dblp:269/6034 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
2.932026
Constructing Hard-Positive Query-Document Pairs for Dense Retrieval via Phrase Representativeness · SIGIR 2026
Learning to Select: Query-Aware Adaptive Dimension Selection for Dense Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
A Text is Worth Several Tokens: Text Embedding from LLMs Secretly Aligns Well with The Key Tokens · ACL (1) 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval models
2.022026
Constructing Hard-Positive Query-Document Pairs for Dense Retrieval via Phrase Representativeness · SIGIR 2026
Learning to Select: Query-Aware Adaptive Dimension Selection for Dense Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval
hard negative mining
1.012026
Constructing Hard-Positive Query-Document Pairs for Dense Retrieval via Phrase Representativeness · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval models
sparse retrieval
0.912025
A Text is Worth Several Tokens: Text Embedding from LLMs Secretly Aligns Well with The Key Tokens · ACL (1) 2025
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis › document representation
text embedding
0.912025
A Text is Worth Several Tokens: Text Embedding from LLMs Secretly Aligns Well with The Key Tokens · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

principal component analysis · 1.7supervised learning · 1.0pseudo-relevance feedback · 1.0phrase representativeness estimation · 1.0knowledge distillation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Okara: Detection and Attribution of TLS Man-in-the-Middle Vulnerabilities in Android Apps with Foundation Models
Haoyun Yang, Ronghong Huang, Beizeng Zhang, Junpu Guo, Zhanyu Wu, Xianghang Mi
ACISP (1)6
2026 Learning to Select: Query-Aware Adaptive Dimension Selection for Dense Retrieval
abstract
Dense retrieval represents queries and documents as high-dimensional embeddings, but these representations can be redundant at the query level: for a given information need, only a subset of dimensions is consistently helpful for ranking.Prior work addresses this via pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) based dimension importance estimation, which can produce query-aware masks without labeled data but often relies on noisy pseudo signals and heuristic test-time procedures.In contrast, supervised adapter methods leverage relevance labels to improve embedding quality, yet they learn global transformations shared across queries and do not explicitly model query-aware dimension importance.We propose a Query-Aware Adaptive Dimension Selection framework that learns to predict per-dimension importance directly from query embedding.We first construct oracle dimension importance distributions over embedding dimensions using supervised relevance labels, and then train a predictor to map a query embedding to these label-distilled importance scores.At inference, the predictor selects a query-aware subset of dimensions for similarity computation based solely on the query embedding, without pseudorelevance feedback.Experiments across multiple dense retrievers and benchmarks show that our learned dimension selector improves retrieval effectiveness over the full-dimensional baseline as well as PRF-based masking and supervised adapter baselines.
Zhanyu Wu, Richong Zhang, Zhijie Nie
ACL (1)1
2026 Constructing Hard-Positive Query-Document Pairs for Dense Retrieval via Phrase Representativeness
Zhanyu Wu, Richong Zhang, Zhijie Nie
SIGIR1
2025 A Text is Worth Several Tokens: Text Embedding from LLMs Secretly Aligns Well with The Key Tokens
abstract
Text embeddings from large language models (LLMs) have achieved excellent results in tasks such as information retrieval, semantic textual similarity, etc. In this work, we show an interesting finding: when feeding a text into the LLM-based embedder, the obtained text embedding will be able to be aligned with the key tokens in the input text. We first fully analyze this phenomenon on eight LLM-based embedders and show that this phenomenon is universal and is not affected by model architecture, training strategy, and embedding method. With a deeper analysis, we find that the main change in embedding space between these embedders and their LLM backbones is in the first principal component. By adjusting the first principal component, we can align text embedding with the key tokens. Finally, we give several examples to demonstrate the vast application potential of this finding: (1) we propose a simple and practical sparse retrieval method based on the aligned tokens, which can achieve 80% of the dense retrieval effect of the same model while reducing the computation significantly; (2) we show that our findings provide a novel perspective to help understand novel technologies (e.g., instruction-following embedding) and fuzzy concepts (e.g., semantic relatedness vs. similarity) in this field.
Zhijie Nie, Richong Zhang, Zhanyu Wu
ACL (1)3