Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Asutosh Srivastava

dblp:269/9476 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
formal verification
0.712023
Formal Verification of Integer Multiplier Circuits Using Binary Decision Diagrams · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.712023
Formal Verification of Integer Multiplier Circuits Using Binary Decision Diagrams · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
multiplier verification
0.712023
Formal Verification of Integer Multiplier Circuits Using Binary Decision Diagrams · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › decision diagrams
binary decision diagram
0.212023
Formal Verification of Integer Multiplier Circuits Using Binary Decision Diagrams · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
equivalence checking
0.212023
Formal Verification of Integer Multiplier Circuits Using Binary Decision Diagrams · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

binary decision diagram · 0.7additional variable method · 0.7SAT · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A comparative study on formal verification techniques to verify large integer multiplier circuits
Asutosh Srivastava, Masahiro Fujita 0004
Integr.2
2023 Formal Verification of Integer Multiplier Circuits Using Binary Decision Diagrams
abstract
Multiplier circuit covers a more extensive area of embedded system application in digital signal processing, cryptography, and multimedia. Nonstandard implementations and custom optimization are being done to reduce the size of multipliers. The circuit became prone to a buggy, and hence the demand for verification increased. Formal verification methods, such as satisfiability (SAT), symbolic computer algebra (SCA), and binary decision diagrams (BDDs) have made massive progress over the last few decades. However, these methods are insufficient to verify the optimized multipliers. SAT-based equivalence checking is computationally expensive. SCA-based backward rewriting is limited to algebraic-friendly multipliers. The complexity of BDDs is exponential with the input size. Although, by allowing an additional variable method, the size of the BDD is limited to 4th degree polynomial of the number of the inputs, this method is not explored to verify optimized multipliers. This article focus on verifying integer multipliers with diverse architectures. We propose an algorithm for the direct construction of BDDs without traversing circuits and generate BDDs up to 1024 bits. We utilize the additional variable method and constructing BDDs using high-to-low variable ordering. We reduce the complexity of BDD size to a 3rd degree polynomial. We generate BDDs and verify the multipliers with various architectures up to 64 bits. We propose a method to verify optimized multipliers by checking equivalence and verifying up to 32-bits optimized multipliers. We do the error tolerance analysis of our approach by inserting bugs in a circuit at various locations.
Yukio Miyasaka, Asutosh Srivastava, Masahiro Fujita 0004
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.3