EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philipp Wolters
dblp:27/10556
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9455-5012ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Autonomous driving · 38% Robot navigation and mapping · 38% 3D vision · 23% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Immersive interaction · 50% Interaction techniques and input · 50% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception
3d perception |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unleashing HyDRa: Hybrid Fusion, Depth Consistency and Radar for Unified 3D Perception · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › sensor fusion
radar-camera fusion |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unleashing HyDRa: Hybrid Fusion, Depth Consistency and Radar for Unified 3D Perception · ICRA 2025 |
Interaction techniques and input › input device
controller-based interaction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimizing Robot Programming: Mixed Reality Gripper Control · ICRA 2025 |
Immersive interaction › mixed reality
mixed reality robot programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimizing Robot Programming: Mixed Reality Gripper Control · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
bird's-eye-view representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Unleashing HyDRa: Hybrid Fusion, Depth Consistency and Radar for Unified 3D Perception · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
semantic scene completion |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Unleashing HyDRa: Hybrid Fusion, Depth Consistency and Radar for Unified 3D Perception · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
within-subjects study · 0.9transformer · 0.9depth consistency · 0.93d-printed gripper attachment · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Optimizing Robot Programming: Mixed Reality Gripper ControlabstractConventional robot programming methods are complex and time-consuming for users. In recent years, alternative approaches such as mixed reality have been explored to address these challenges and optimize robot programming. While the findings of the mixed reality robot programming methods are convincing, most existing methods rely on gesture interaction for robot programming. Since controller-based interactions have proven to be more reliable, this paper examines three controller-based programming methods within a mixed reality scenario: 1) Classical Jogging, where the user positions the robot's end effector using the controller's thumbsticks, 2) Direct Control, where the controller's position and orientation directly corresponds to the end effector's, and 3) Gripper Control, where the controller is enhanced with a 3D-printed gripper attachment to grasp and release objects. A within-subjects study$(n = 30)$was conducted to compare these methods. The findings indicate that the Gripper Control condition outperforms the others in terms of task completion time, user experience, mental demand, and task performance, while also being the preferred method. Therefore, it demonstrates promising potential as an effective and efficient approach for future robot programming. Video available at https://youtu.be/83kWr8zUFIQ. Maximilian Rettinger, Leander Hacker, Philipp Wolters, Gerhard Rigoll |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2025 | Unleashing HyDRa: Hybrid Fusion, Depth Consistency and Radar for Unified 3D PerceptionabstractLow-cost, vision-centric 3D perception systems for autonomous driving have made significant progress in recent years, narrowing the gap to expensive LiDAR-based methods. The primary challenge in becoming a fully reliable alternative lies in robust depth prediction capabilities, as camera-based systems struggle with long detection ranges and adverse lighting and weather conditions. In this work, we introduce HyDRa, a novel camera-radar fusion architecture for diverse 3D perception tasks. Building upon the principles of dense Bird's-EyeView (BEV)-based architectures, HyDRa introduces a hybrid fusion approach to combine the strengths of complementary camera and radar features in two distinct representation spaces. Our Height Association Transformer module leverages radar features already in the perspective view to produce more robust and accurate depth predictions. In the BEV, we refine the initial sparse representation by a Radar-weighted Depth Consistency. HyDRa achieves a new state-of-the-art for cameraradar fusion of 64.2 NDS (+1.8) and 58.4 AMOTA (+1.5) on the public nuScenes dataset. Moreover, our new semantically rich and spatially accurate BEV features can be directly converted into a powerful occupancy representation, beating all previous camera-based methods on the Occ3D benchmark by an impressive 3.7 mIoU. Code and models are available at https://github.com/phi-wol/hydra. Philipp Wolters, Johannes Gilg, Torben Teepe, Fabian Herzog, Anouar Laouichi, Martin Hofmann 0011, Gerhard Rigoll |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2024 | Do We Still Need Non-Maximum Suppression? Accurate Confidence Estimates and Implicit Duplication Modeling with IoU-Aware CalibrationabstractObject detectors are at the heart of many semi- and fully autonomous decision systems and are poised to become even more indispensable. They are, however, still lacking in accessibility and can sometimes produce unreliable predictions. Especially concerning in this regard are the—essentially hand-crafted—non-maximum suppression algorithms that lead to an obfuscated prediction process and biased confidence estimates. We show that we can eliminate classic NMS-style post-processing by using IoU-aware calibration. IoU-aware calibration is a conditional Beta calibration; this makes it parallelizable with no hyper-parameters. Instead of arbitrary cutoffs or discounts, it implicitly accounts for the likelihood of each detection being a duplicate and adjusts the confidence score accordingly, resulting in empirically based precision estimates for each detection. Our extensive experiments on diverse detection architectures show that the proposed IoU-aware calibration can successfully model duplicate detections and improve calibration. Compared to the standard sequential NMS and calibration approach, our joint modeling can deliver performance gains over the best NMS-based alternative while producing consistently better-calibrated confidence predictions with less complexity. The code for all our experiments is publicly available1. Johannes Gilg, Torben Teepe, Fabian Herzog, Philipp Wolters, Gerhard Rigoll |
WACV | 4 |