Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mohsen Ghazel
dblp:27/1841
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 63% Image and video coding · 37% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Fractal-wavelet image denoising revisited · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2006 Fractal image denoising · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2003 |
Image and video coding › transform coding
wavelet coding |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Fractal-wavelet image denoising revisited · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2006 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising › wavelet-based denoising
wavelet thresholding |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Fractal-wavelet image denoising revisited · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2006 |
Image and video coding › image compression
fractal image coding |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Fractal image denoising · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2003 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Fractal image denoising · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quadtree partitioning · 0.1fractal-wavelet coding · 0.1lee filter · 0.0fractal coding · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Fractal-wavelet image denoising revisitedabstractThe essence of fractal image denoising is to predict the fractal code of a noiseless image from its noisy observation. From the predicted fractal code, one can generate an estimate of the original image. We show how well fractal-wavelet denoising predicts parent wavelet subtress of the noiseless image. The performance of various fractal-wavelet denoising schemes (e.g., fixed partitioning, quadtree partitioning) is compared to that of some standard wavelet thresholding methods. We also examine the use of cycle spinning in fractal-based image denoising for the purpose enhancing the denoised estimates. Our experimental results show that these fractal-based image denoising methods are quite competitive with standard wavelet thresholding methods for image denoising. Finally, we compare the performance of the pixel- and wavelet-based fractal denoising schemes. Mohsen Ghazel, George H. Freeman, Edward R. Vrscay |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2003 | Fractal image denoisingabstractOver the past decade, there has been significant interest in fractal coding for the purpose of image compression. However, applications of fractal-based coding to other aspects of image processing have received little attention. We propose a fractal-based method to enhance and restore a noisy image. If the noisy image is simply fractally coded, a significant amount of the noise is suppressed. However, one can go a step further and estimate the fractal code of the original noise-free image from that of the noisy image, based upon a knowledge (or estimate) of the variance of the noise, assumed to be zero-mean, stationary and Gaussian. The resulting fractal code yields a significantly enhanced and restored representation of the original noisy image. The enhancement is consistent with the human visual system where extra smoothing is performed in flat and low activity regions and a lower degree of smoothing is performed near high frequency components, e.g., edges, of the image. We find that, for significant noise variance (sigma > or = 20), the fractal-based scheme yields results that are generally better than those obtained by the Lee filter which uses a localized first order filtering process similar to fractal schemes. We also show that the Lee filter and the fractal method are closely related. Mohsen Ghazel, George H. Freeman, Edward R. Vrscay |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2002 | Fractal-wavelet image denoisingabstractWe propose a simple yet effective fractal-wavelet scheme for edge-preserving smoothing of noisy images. Over the past decade, there has been significant interest in fractal coding for the purpose of image compression. Fractal-wavelet transforms were introduced in an effort to reduce the blockiness and computational complexity that are inherent in fractal image compression. Applications of fractal-based coding to other aspects of image processing, however, have received little attention. The authors proposed a simple yet effective fractal-based image denoising scheme that is applied in the spatial domain of the image. We extend the application of this fractal denoising scheme to the wavelet domain of the image. We find that when the wavelet transform of the noisy image is simply fractally coded, a significant amount of the noise is suppressed. However, one can go a step further and estimate the fractal code of the wavelet transform of the original noise-free image from that of the wavelet transform of the noisy image. The use of the quadtree partitioning scheme for the purpose of fractal-wavelet coding results in a significantly enhanced and restored representation of the original noisy image. The enhancement is consistent with the human visual system where extra smoothing is performed in flat and low activity regions and a lower degree of smoothing is performed near high frequency components, e.g. edges, of the image. The main advantage of the wavelet-based fractal denoising scheme over the standard fractal denoising scheme is that it is computationally less expensive. Mohsen Ghazel, Edward R. Vrscay, George H. Freeman |
ICIP (1) | 1 |
| 1999 | An Interpolative Scheme for Fractal Image Compression in the Wavelet Domain
Mohsen Ghazel, Edward R. Vrscay, Amir K. Khandani |
CAIP | 1 |