Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ravi Agrawal

dblp:27/2674 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-1350-7125ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 42% Machine translation · 40% Reinforcement learning · 12%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › instruction following
instruction hierarchy
0.912025
Instructional Segment Embedding: Improving LLM Safety with Instruction Hierarchy · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model safety
0.912025
Instructional Segment Embedding: Improving LLM Safety with Instruction Hierarchy · ICLR 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial defense
prompt injection defense
0.912025
Instructional Segment Embedding: Improving LLM Safety with Instruction Hierarchy · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization
0.812024
WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback
0.812024
WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › speech translation
cascaded speech translation
0.712023
CLAD-ST: Contrastive Learning with Adversarial Data for Robust Speech Translation · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
0.712023
CLAD-ST: Contrastive Learning with Adversarial Data for Robust Speech Translation · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
robust machine translation
0.712023
CLAD-ST: Contrastive Learning with Adversarial Data for Robust Speech Translation · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
speech translation
0.712023
CLAD-ST: Contrastive Learning with Adversarial Data for Robust Speech Translation · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following
0.312025
Instructional Segment Embedding: Improving LLM Safety with Instruction Hierarchy · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › robust contrastive learning
adversarial contrastive learning
0.212023
CLAD-ST: Contrastive Learning with Adversarial Data for Robust Speech Translation · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.212023
CLAD-ST: Contrastive Learning with Adversarial Data for Robust Speech Translation · EMNLP 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

instructional segment embedding · 1.7weighted preference optimization · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.8curriculum learning · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7adversarial examples · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Instructional Segment Embedding: Improving LLM Safety with Instruction Hierarchy
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to security and safety threats, such as prompt injection, prompt extraction, and harmful requests. One major cause of these vulnerabilities is the lack of an instruction hierarchy. Modern LLM architectures treat all inputs equally, failing to distinguish between and prioritize various types of instructions, such as system messages, user prompts, and data. As a result, lower-priority user prompts may override more critical system instructions, including safety protocols. Existing approaches to achieving instruction hierarchy, such as delimiters and instruction-based training, do not address this issue at the architectural level. We introduce the $\textbf{I}$nstructional $\textbf{S}$egment $\textbf{E}$mbedding (ISE) technique, inspired by BERT, to modern large language models, which embeds instruction priority information directly into the model. This approach enables models to explicitly differentiate and prioritize various instruction types, significantly improving safety against malicious prompts that attempt to override priority rules. Our experiments on the Structured Query and Instruction Hierarchy benchmarks demonstrate an average robust accuracy increase of up to 15.75\% and 18.68\%, respectively. Furthermore, we observe an improvement in the instruction-following capability of up to 4.1\% on AlpacaEval. Overall, our approach offers a promising direction for enhancing the safety and effectiveness of LLM architectures.
Shujian Zhang, Kaiqiang Song, Silei Xu, Sanqiang Zhao, Ravi Agrawal, Sathish Reddy Indurthi, Chong Xiang 0001, Prateek Mittal, Wenxuan Zhou 0005
ICLR6
2024 WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization
abstract
Wenxuan Zhou, Ravi Agrawal, Shujian Zhang, Sathish Reddy Indurthi, Sanqiang Zhao, Kaiqiang Song, Silei Xu, Chenguang Zhu. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Wenxuan Zhou 0005, Ravi Agrawal, Shujian Zhang, Sathish Reddy Indurthi, Sanqiang Zhao, Kaiqiang Song, Silei Xu
EMNLP2
2023 CLAD-ST: Contrastive Learning with Adversarial Data for Robust Speech Translation
abstract
The cascaded approach continues to be the most popular choice for speech translation (ST).This approach consists of an automatic speech recognition (ASR) model and a machine translation (MT) model that are used in a pipeline to translate speech in one language to text in another language.MT models are often trained on well-formed text and therefore lack robustness while translating noisy ASR outputs in the cascaded approach, degrading the overall translation quality significantly.We address this robustness problem in downstream MT models by forcing the MT encoder to bring the representations of a noisy input closer to its clean version in the semantic space.This is achieved by introducing a contrastive learning method that leverages adversarial examples in the form of ASR outputs paired with their corresponding human transcripts to optimize the network parameters.In addition, a curriculum learning strategy is then used to stabilize the training by alternating the standard MT log-likelihood loss and the contrastive losses.Our approach achieves significant gains of up to 3 BLEU scores in English-German and English-French speech translation without hurting the translation quality on clean text.
Sathish Indurthi, Shamil Chollampatt, Ravi Agrawal, Marco Turchi
EMNLP3
2019 Primal Heuristic for the Linear Ordering Problem
abstract
In this paper, we propose a new primal heuristic for the Linear Ordering Problem (LOP) that generates an integer feasible solution from the solution to the LP relaxation at each node of the branch-and-bound search tree. The heuristic first finds a partition of the set of vertices S into an ordered pair of subsets {S1,S2} such that the difference between the weights of all arcs from S1 to S2 and the weights of all arcs from S2 to S1 is maximized. It then assumes that all vertices in S1 precede all vertices in S2 thus decomposing the original problem instance into subproblems of smaller size i.e. on subsets S1 and S2. It recursively does so until the subproblems can be solved quickly using an MIP solver. The solution to the original problem instance is then constructed by concatenating the solutions to the subproblems. The heuristic is used to propose integer feasible solutions for the branch-and-bound algorithm. We also devise an alternate node selection strategy based on the heuristic solutions where we select the node with the best heuristic solution. We report the results of our experiments with the heuristic and the node selection strategy based on the heuristic.
Ravi Agrawal, Ehsan Iranmanesh, Ramesh Krishnamurti
ICORES1
2009 Variable Support Based Association Rule Mining
abstract
Analysing datasets requires sophisticated techniques which can help to unearth interesting patterns. One approach is to mine multidimensional association rules from data. The traditional association rule mining relies on uniform support and confidence values which does not always yield interesting rules due to varied nature of data. This paper presents a novel approach to mine multidimensional association rules from dataset with varying support. The improved algorithm is being proposed to overcome missing aspect of tradition rule mining algorithms like Apriori.
Rajul Anand, Ravi Agrawal, Joydip Dhar
COMPSAC (2)2