Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dragos-Anton Manolescu

dblp:27/3220 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 44% Programming languages and type systems · 44% Software maintenance and evolution · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems
object-oriented programming
0.012002
Workflow enactment with continuation and future objects · OOPSLA 2002
Services computing and microservices
workflow management
0.012002
Workflow enactment with continuation and future objects · OOPSLA 2002
Software maintenance and evolution › software evolution
software change
0.012002
Workflow enactment with continuation and future objects · OOPSLA 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

future objects · 0.0continuations · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Workflow enactment with continuation and future objects
abstract
An increasing number of software developers are turning to workflow to separate the logic and the control aspects in their applications, thus making them more amenable to change. However, in spite of recent efforts to standardize and provide reusable workflow components, many developers build their own. This is a challenging endeavor and involves solving problems which seem incompatible with the object paradigm and current object-oriented programming languages. In the context of an object-oriented workflow framework, this paper demonstrates a novel approach that resolves this impedance mismatch with techniques drawn from programming language theory. This successful cross-pollination narrows the gap between the results of decades of research in programming languages and developers working hard to cope with change.
Dragos-Anton Manolescu
OOPSLA1