EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Gray
dblp:27/3508
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 87% Programming languages and type systems · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design › specification
functional specification |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | Analysis and Design in MSG.84: Formalizing Functional Specifications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1985 |
Programming languages and type systems
formal language |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | Analysis and Design in MSG.84: Formalizing Functional Specifications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1985 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
message passing paradigm · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Making existing software quantum safe: A case study on IBM Db2
Lei Zhang 0078, Andriy V. Miranskyy, Walid Rjaibi, Greg Stager, Michael Gray, John Peck |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 5 |
| 2012 | Scaling Down Off-the-Shelf Data Compression: Backwards-Compatible Fine-Grain MixingabstractPu and Singaravelu presented Fine-Grain Mixing, an adaptive compression system which aimed to maximize CPU and network utilization simultaneously by splitting a network stream into a mixture of compressed and uncompressed blocks. Blocks were compressed opportunistically in a send buffer, they compressed as many blocks as they could without becoming a bottleneck. They successfully utilized all available CPU and network bandwidth even on high speed connections. In addition, they noted much greater throughput than previous adaptive compression systems. Here, we take a different view of FG-Mixing than was taken by Pu and Singaravelu and give another explanation for its high performance: that fine-grain mixing of compressed and uncompressed blocks enables off-the-shelf compressors to scale down their degree of compression linearly with decreasing CPU usage. Exploring the scaling behavior in-depth allows us to make a variety of improvements to fine-grain mixed compression: better compression ratios for a given level of CPU consumption, a wider range of data reduction and CPU cost options, and parallelized compression to take advantage of multi-core CPUs. We make full compatibility with the ubiquitous deflate decompress or (as used in many network protocols directly, or as the back-end of the gzip and Zip formats) a primary goal, rather than using a special, incompatible protocol as in the original implementation of FG-Mixing. Moreover, we show that the benefits of fine-grain mixing are retained by our compatible version. Michael Gray, Peter Peterson, Peter L. Reiher |
ICDCS | 1 |
| 1985 | Analysis and Design in MSG.84: Formalizing Functional SpecificationsabstractModel building is identified as the most important part of the analysis and design process for software systems. A set of primitives to support this process is presented, along with a formal language, MSG.84, for recording the results of analysis and design. The semantics of the notation is defined in terms of the actor formalism, which is based on a message passing paradigm. The automatic derivation of a graphical form of the specification for user review is discussed. Potentials for computer-aided design based on MSG.84 are indicated. Valdis Berzins, Michael Gray |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |