Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mark K. Singley
dblp:27/4512
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 8 · 6 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
5 papers |
Learning and educational technologies · 57% Collaborative and social computing · 25% Usability and user experience research · 16% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Learning and educational technologies › learning analytics
classroom analytics |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | The classroom sentinel: supporting data-driven decision-making in the classroom · WWW 2005 |
Collaborative and social computing
collaborative learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Algebra jam: supporting teamwork and managing roles in a collaborative learning environment · CSCW 2000 |
Collaborative and social computing › collaborative learning
computer-supported collaborative learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Algebra jam: supporting teamwork and managing roles in a collaborative learning environment · CSCW 2000 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | The classroom sentinel: supporting data-driven decision-making in the classroom · WWW 2005 |
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
comparative evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Comparative usability evaluation: critical incidents and critical threads · CHI 1994 |
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
critical incident method |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Comparative usability evaluation: critical incidents and critical threads · CHI 1994 |
Usability and user experience research
usability evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Comparative usability evaluation: critical incidents and critical threads · CHI 1994 |
Learning and educational technologies
intelligent tutoring systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Algebra jam: supporting teamwork and managing roles in a collaborative learning environment · CSCW 2000 |
Interaction techniques and input
text editing |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | The Transfer of Text-Editing Skill · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1985 |
Programming languages and type systems › object-oriented programming
smalltalk |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | MOLEHILL: an instructional system for Smalltalk programming · CHI 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
data mining · 0.1bayesian inference network · 0.0instructional system design · 0.0critical incident analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | PASTEL: Pattern-Driven Adaptive Simulations
Mark K. Singley, Peter G. Fairweather, Tracee Vetting Wolf, Dick Lam |
INTERACT (2) | 1 |
| 2005 | The classroom sentinel: supporting data-driven decision-making in the classroomabstractWhereas schools typically record mounds of data regarding student performance, attendance, and other behaviors over the course of a school year, rarely is that data consulted and used to inform day-to-day instructional practice in the classroom. As teachers come under increasing pressure to ensure success for all of their students, we are attempting to provide tools to help teachers make sense of what is happening in their classrooms and take appropriate proactive and/or remedial action. One such tool is a Web service we've dubbed the Classroom Sentinel. The Classroom Sentinel mines electronic gradebook and other student information system data sources to detect critical teaching and learning patterns and bring those patterns to the attention of the teacher in the form of timely alerts. In this paper, we introduce the notion of classroom patterns, present some examples, and describe a framework for alert generation and delivery. Mark K. Singley, Richard B. Lam |
WWW | 1 |
| 2000 | Algebra jam: supporting teamwork and managing roles in a collaborative learning environmentabstractWe are building a collaborative learning environement that supports teams of students as they collaborate synchronously and remotely to solve situated, multi-step problems involving algebraic modeling. Our system, named Algebra Jam, provides a set of tools to help students overcome two of the most serious impediments to successful collaboration: establishing common ground and maintaining group focus. These tools include tethered and untethered modes of operation including discrepancy notification, a goal-oriented team blackboard, object-oriented chat with collabicons, reification of problem solving roles, and the optional inclusion of a tutor agent as a virtual team participant. The tutor agent not only offers help and feedback on problem solving actions but also accumulates evidence about individual and group problem solving performance in a Bayesian inference network. The system is envisioned as a testbed for developing theories of teaming. Mark K. Singley, Moninder Singh, Peter G. Fairweather, Robert G. Farrell, Steven Swerling |
CSCW | 1 |
| 1995 | Multiple multimodal mentors: delivering computer-based instruction via specialized anthropomorphic advisorsabstractWe describe the Smalltalk Gurus, components of the MoleHill intelligent tutoring system for Smalltalk programming. The Gurus offer help on plans for achieving goals in the Smalltalk environment, as well as remediation for students' incorrect and less-than-optimal plans. The Gurus' assistance is provided via the multimodal media of animation and voice-over audio. MoleHill employs multiple Gurus to deliver advice and instruction concerning disparate information domains, thus facilitating learners' cognitive organization and assimilation of new knowledge and information. We have labelled the approach instantiated by the Smalltalk Gurus the guru instructional model, one which is generally applicable to computer-based advisory systems. Sherman R. Alpert, Mark K. Singley, John M. Carroll 0001 |
Behav. Inf. Technol. | 2 |
| 1994 | Comparative usability evaluation: critical incidents and critical threadsabstractEm irical usability evaluations (particularly forrna~ive J ev uations [13]) hinge on observing and interpreting critical incidents [8] of use.We proposed [3,5] augmenting critical incident methods by analysis of what we called critical threads: sets of causally related user episodes that, taken together, define major usability themes.This paper extents this work to the comparative usability analysis of a related artifact.We discuss how our earlier claims analysis was used to orient and simplify our current evaluation efforts. Jürgen Koenemann, John M. Carroll 0001, Mary Beth Rosson, Mark K. Singley |
CHI | 4 |
| 1991 | MOLEHILL: an instructional system for Smalltalk programmingabstractNo abstract available. Mark K. Singley |
CHI | 1 |
| 1990 | Minimalist planning tools in an instructional system for smalltalk programming
Mark K. Singley, John M. Carroll 0001 |
INTERACT | 1 |
| 1987 | A Keystroke Analysis of Learning and Transfer in Text EditingabstractTwo experiments studied the acquisition and transfer of text-editing skill. The first experiment, originally reported in Singley and Anderson (1985) but reanalyzed in greater detail here, found nearly total transfer between two similar line editors and partial transfer from the line editors to a screen editor. Analyses of the keystroke data revealed that the majority of the improvement during both learning and transfer was concentrated in the planning components of the skill. The second experiment found little evidence for negative transfer between a pair of screen editors designed for maximal interference using a classic interference paradigm. The few instances of negative transfer observed were better characterized as the positive transfer of nonoptimal methods rather than instances of true procedural interference. These results support an identical elements model of transfer based on a production system representation of cognitive skill. The relative magnitudes of transfer observed were consistent with detailed measures of production system overlap. In addition, localized transfer sites were hypothesized and identified through a series of microanalyses. Finally, specific transfer predictions based on the differential practice of general and specific components were tested and confirmed. Mark K. Singley, John R. Anderson |
Hum. Comput. Interact. | 1 |
| 1985 | The Transfer of Text-Editing Skill
Mark K. Singley, John R. Anderson |
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. | 1 |