EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul T. Darga
dblp:27/453
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Programming languages and type systems · 34% Program verification · 34% Program analysis · 31% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification › model checking
software model checking |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Efficient software model checking of soundness of type systems · OOPSLA 2008 Efficient software model checking of data structure properties · OOPSLA 2006 |
Electronic design automation
boolean satisfiability |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Faster symmetry discovery using sparsity of symmetries · DAC 2008 Exploiting structure in symmetry detection for CNF · DAC 2004 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Faster symmetry discovery using sparsity of symmetries · DAC 2008 Exploiting structure in symmetry detection for CNF · DAC 2004 |
Program analysis
state pruning |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Efficient software model checking of data structure properties · OOPSLA 2006 Efficient software model checking of soundness of type systems · OOPSLA 2008 |
Programming languages and type systems › type systems
soundness |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Efficient software model checking of soundness of type systems · OOPSLA 2008 |
Programming languages and type systems
type systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Efficient software model checking of soundness of type systems · OOPSLA 2008 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › boolean function analysis
symmetry detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Faster symmetry discovery using sparsity of symmetries · DAC 2008 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Efficient software model checking of data structure properties · OOPSLA 2006 |
Program verification › model checking
bounded model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Efficient software model checking of data structure properties · OOPSLA 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
state space pruning · 0.1graph symmetry detection · 0.1sparsity exploitation · 0.1small-step operational semantics · 0.1program analysis · 0.1partition refinement · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Faster symmetry discovery using sparsity of symmetriesabstractMany computational tools have recently begun to benefit from the use of the symmetry inherent in the tasks they solve, and use general-purpose graph symmetry tools to uncover this symmetry. However, existing tools suffer quadratic runtime in the number of symmetries explicitly returned and are of limited use on very large, sparse, symmetric graphs. This paper introduces a new symmetry-discovery algorithm which exploits the sparsity present not only in the input but also the output, i.e., the symmetries themselves. By avoiding quadratic runtime on large graphs, it improves state-of- the-art runtimes from several days to less than a second. Paul T. Darga, Karem A. Sakallah, Igor L. Markov |
DAC | 1 |
| 2008 | Efficient software model checking of soundness of type systemsabstractThis paper presents novel techniques for checking the soundness of a type system automatically using a software model checker. Our idea is to systematically generate every type correct intermediate program state (within some finite bounds), execute the program one step forward if possible using its small step operational semantics, and then check that the resulting intermediate program state is also type correct--but do so efficiently by detecting similarities in this search space and pruning away large portions of the search space. Thus, given only a specification of type correctness and the small step operational semantics for a language, our system automatically checks type soundness by checking that the progress and preservation theorems hold for the language (albeit for program states of at most some finite size). Our preliminary experimental results on several languages--including a language of integer and boolean expressions, a simple imperative programming language, an object-oriented language which is a subset of Java, and a language with ownership types--indicate that our approach is feasible and that our search space pruning techniques do indeed significantly reduce what is otherwise an extremely large search space. Our paper thus makes contributions both in the area of checking soundness of type systems, and in the area of reducing the state space of a software model checker. Michael Roberson, Melanie Harries, Paul T. Darga, Chandrasekhar Boyapati |
OOPSLA | 3 |
| 2006 | Efficient software model checking of data structure propertiesabstractThis paper presents novel language and analysis techniques that significantly speed up software model checking of data structure properties. Consider checking a red-black tree implementation. Traditional software model checkers systematically generate all red-black tree states (within some given bounds) and check every red-black tree operation (such as insert, delete, or lookup) on every red-black tree state. Our key idea is as follows. As our checker checks a red-black tree operation o on a red-black tree state s, it uses program analysis techniques to identify other red-black tree states s'1, s'2, ..., s'k on which the operation o behaves similarly. Our analyses guarantee that if o executes correctly on s, then o will execute correctly on every s'i. Our checker therefore does not need to check o on any s'i once it checks o on s. It thus safely prunes those state transitions from its search space, while still achieving complete test coverage within the bounded domain. Our preliminary results show orders of magnitude improvement over previous approaches. We believe our techniques can make model checking significantly faster, and thus enable checking of much larger programs and complex program properties than currently possible. Paul T. Darga, Chandrasekhar Boyapati |
OOPSLA | 1 |
| 2004 | Exploiting structure in symmetry detection for CNFabstractInstances of the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) arise in many areas of circuit design and verification. These instances are typically constructed from some human-designed artifact, and thus are likely to possess much inherent symmetry and sparsity. Previous work[4] has shown that exploiting symmetries results in vastly reduced SAT solver run times, often with the search for the symmetries themselves dominating the total SAT solving time. Our contribution is twofold. First, we dissect the algorithms behind the venerable NAUTY[9] package, particularly the partition refinement procedure responsible for the majority of search space pruning as well as the majority of run time overhead. Second, we present a new symmetry-detection tool, SAUCY, which outperforms NAUTY by several orders of magnitude on the large, structured CNF formulas generated from typical EDA problems. Paul T. Darga, Mark H. Liffiton, Karem A. Sakallah, Igor L. Markov |
DAC | 1 |