We investigate four previously unexplored aspects of ensemble selection, a procedure for building ensembles of classifiers. First we test whether adjusting model predictions to put them on a canonical scale makes the ensembles more effective. Second, we explore the performance of ensemble selection when different amounts of data are available for ensemble hillclimbing. Third, we quantify the benefit of ensemble selection's ability to optimize to arbitrary metrics. Fourth, we study the performance impact of pruning the number of models available for ensemble selection. Based on our results we present improved ensemble selection methods that double the benefit of the original method.

The Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology's mission is to interpret and conserve the earth's biological diversity through research, education, and citizen science focused on birds. Over the years, the Lab has accumulated one of the largest and longest-running collections of environmental data sets in existence. The data sets are not only large, but also have many attributes, contain many missing values, and potentially are very noisy. The ecologists are interested in identifying which features have the strongest effect on the distribution and abundance of bird species as well as describing the forms of these relationships. We show how data mining can be successfully applied, enabling the ecologists to discover unanticipated relationships. We compare a variety of methods for measuring attribute importance with respect to the probability of a bird being observed at a feeder and present initial results for the impact of important attributes on bird prevalence.