Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Praveen K. Paritosh
dblp:27/5886
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 64% Information extraction and text analysis · 19% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 12% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-AI interaction · 56% Collaborative and social computing · 44% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 72% Knowledge graphs · 12% Graph data management · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
Data-centric AI |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Development · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text similarity
paraphrase identification |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Learning Paraphrase Identification with Structural Alignment · IJCAI 2016 |
Information retrieval
question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Web Question Answering: Beyond Factoids: SIGIR 2015 Workshop · SIGIR 2015 |
Information retrieval › question answering
web question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Web Question Answering: Beyond Factoids: SIGIR 2015 Workshop · SIGIR 2015 |
Collaborative and social computing
crowdsourcing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | And Now for Something Completely Different: Improving Crowdsourcing Workflows with Micro-Diversions · CSCW 2015 |
Collaborative and social computing › crowdsourcing
worker retention |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | And Now for Something Completely Different: Improving Crowdsourcing Workflows with Micro-Diversions · CSCW 2015 |
Human-AI interaction
AI for social good |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | "Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI · CHI 2021 |
Knowledge graphs
collaborative knowledge graph |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge · SIGMOD Conference 2008 |
Graph data management
graph database |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge · SIGMOD Conference 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
structural alignment |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Learning Paraphrase Identification with Structural Alignment · IJCAI 2016 |
Collaborative and social computing › crowdsourcing
crowdsourcing workflows |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | And Now for Something Completely Different: Improving Crowdsourcing Workflows with Micro-Diversions · CSCW 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Analysis of Strategic Knowledge in Back of the Envelope Reasoning · AAAI 2005 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
qualitative reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Analysis of Strategic Knowledge in Back of the Envelope Reasoning · AAAI 2005 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge-based systems
strategic knowledge |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Analysis of Strategic Knowledge in Back of the Envelope Reasoning · AAAI 2005 |
Data models and query languages
graph query language |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge · SIGMOD Conference 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmarking · 0.7statistical reliability analysis · 0.5interview study · 0.5structural alignment · 0.2online experiment · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI DevelopmentabstractMachine learning research has long focused on models rather than datasets, and prominent datasets are used for common ML tasks without regard to the breadth, difficulty, and faithfulness of the underlying problems. Neglecting the fundamental importance of data has given rise to inaccuracy, bias, and fragility in real-world applications, and research is hindered by saturation across existing dataset benchmarks. In response, we present DataPerf, a community-led benchmark suite for evaluating ML datasets and data-centric algorithms. We aim to foster innovation in data-centric AI through competition, comparability, and reproducibility. We enable the ML community to iterate on datasets, instead of just architectures, and we provide an open, online platform with multiple rounds of challenges to support this iterative development. The first iteration of DataPerf contains five benchmarks covering a wide spectrum of data-centric techniques, tasks, and modalities in vision, speech, acquisition, debugging, and diffusion prompting, and we support hosting new contributed benchmarks from the community. The benchmarks, online evaluation platform, and baseline implementations are open source, and the MLCommons Association will maintain DataPerf to ensure long-term benefits to academia and industry. Mark Mazumder, Colby R. Banbury, Xiaozhe Yao, Bojan Karlas, William Gaviria Rojas, Sudnya Frederick Diamos, Gregory Frederick Diamos, Lynn He, Alicia Parrish, Hannah Kirk, Jessica Quaye, Charvi Rastogi, Douwe Kiela, David Jurado, David Kanter, Rafael Mosquera, Will Cukierski, Juan Ciro, Lora Aroyo, Bilge Acun, Lingjiao Chen, Mehul Raje, Max Bartolo, Sabri Eyuboglu, Amirata Ghorbani, Emmett D. Goodman, Addison Howard, Oana Inel, Tariq Kane, Christine R. Kirkpatrick, D. Sculley, Tzu-Sheng Kuo, Jonas Mueller 0001, Tristan Thrush, Joaquin Vanschoren, Margaret Warren, Adina Williams, Serena Yeung-Levy, Newsha Ardalani, Praveen K. Paritosh, Ce Zhang 0001, James Zou 0001, Carole-Jean Wu, Cody Coleman, Andrew Y. Ng, Peter Mattson, Vijay Janapa Reddi |
NeurIPS | 40 |
| 2021 | Cross-replication Reliability - An Empirical Approach to Interpreting Inter-rater ReliabilityabstractKa Wong, Praveen Paritosh, Lora Aroyo. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Ka Wong, Praveen K. Paritosh, Lora Aroyo |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2021 | "Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data Cascades in High-Stakes AIabstractAI models are increasingly applied in high-stakes domains like health and conservation. Data quality carries an elevated significance in high-stakes AI due to its heightened downstream impact, impacting predictions like cancer detection, wildlife poaching, and loan allocations. Paradoxically, data is the most under-valued and de-glamorised aspect of AI. In this paper, we report on data practices in high-stakes AI, from interviews with 53 AI practitioners in India, East and West African countries, and USA. We define, identify, and present empirical evidence on Data Cascades—compounding events causing negative, downstream effects from data issues—triggered by conventional AI/ML practices that undervalue data quality. Data cascades are pervasive (92% prevalence), invisible, delayed, but often avoidable. We discuss HCI opportunities in designing and incentivizing data excellence as a first-class citizen of AI, resulting in safer and more robust systems for all. Nithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong, Praveen K. Paritosh, Lora Aroyo |
CHI | 5 |
| 2017 | Characterizing Online Communities Using Coarse Discourse Structures
Amy X. Zhang, Bryan Culbertson, Praveen K. Paritosh |
ICWSM | 3 |
| 2016 | Learning Paraphrase Identification with Structural Alignment
Praveen K. Paritosh, Vinodh Rajendran, Kenneth D. Forbus |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2016 | Crowdsourcing Human Annotation on Web Page Structure: Infrastructure Design and Behavior-Based Quality ControlabstractParsing the semantic structure of a web page is a key component of web information extraction. Successful extraction algorithms usually require large-scale training and evaluation datasets, which are difficult to acquire. Recently, crowdsourcing has proven to be an effective method of collecting large-scale training data in domains that do not require much domain knowledge. For more complex domains, researchers have proposed sophisticated quality control mechanisms to replicate tasks in parallel or sequential ways and then aggregate responses from multiple workers. Conventional annotation integration methods often put more trust in the workers with high historical performance; thus, they are called performance-based methods. Recently, Rzeszotarski and Kittur have demonstrated that behavioral features are also highly correlated with annotation quality in several crowdsourcing applications. In this article, we present a new crowdsourcing system, called Wernicke, to provide annotations for web information extraction. Wernicke collects a wide set of behavioral features and, based on these features, predicts annotation quality for a challenging task domain: annotating web page structure. We evaluate the effectiveness of quality control using behavioral features through a case study where 32 workers annotate 200 Q&A web pages from five popular websites. In doing so, we discover several things: (1) Many behavioral features are significant predictors for crowdsourcing quality. (2) The behavioral-feature-based method outperforms performance-based methods in recall prediction, while performing equally with precision prediction. In addition, using behavioral features is less vulnerable to the cold-start problem, and the corresponding prediction model is more generalizable for predicting recall than precision for cross-website quality analysis. (3) One can effectively combine workers’ behavioral information and historical performance information to further reduce prediction errors. Shuguang Han, Peng Dai 0001, Praveen K. Paritosh, David Huynh |
ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. | 3 |
| 2015 | And Now for Something Completely Different: Improving Crowdsourcing Workflows with Micro-DiversionsabstractCrowdsourcing has become a popular and indispensable component of many problem-solving pipelines in the research literature, with crowd workers often treated as computational resources that can reliably solve problems that computers have trouble with, such as image labeling/classification, natural language processing, or document writing. Yet, obviously crowd workers are human, and long sequences of the same monotonous tasks might intuitively reduce the amount of good quality work done by the workers. Here we propose an investigation into how we can use diversions containing small amounts of entertainment to improve crowd workers' experiences. We call these small period of entertainment ``micro-diversions", which we hypothesize to provide timely relief to workers during long sequences of micro-tasks. We hope to improve productivity by retaining workers to work on our tasks longer and to either improve or retain the quality of work. We experimentally test micro-diversions on Amazon's Mechanical Turk, a large paid-crowdsourcing platform. We find that micro-diversions can significantly improve worker retention rate while retaining the same work quality. Peng Dai 0001, Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski, Praveen K. Paritosh, Ed H. Chi |
CSCW | 3 |
| 2015 | Web Question Answering: Beyond Factoids: SIGIR 2015 WorkshopabstractNo abstract available. Eugene Agichtein, David Carmel, Charles L. A. Clarke, Praveen K. Paritosh, Dan Pelleg, Idan Szpektor |
SIGIR | 4 |
| 2010 | A framework for on-line trend extraction and fault diagnosis
Mano Ram Maurya, Praveen K. Paritosh, Raghunathan Rengaswamy, Venkat Venkatasubramanian |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 2 |
| 2008 | Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledgeabstractFreebase is a practical, scalable tuple database used to structure general human knowledge. The data in Freebase is collaboratively created, structured, and maintained. Freebase currently contains more than 125,000,000 tuples, more than 4000 types, and more than 7000 properties. Public read/write access to Freebase is allowed through an HTTP-based graph-query API using the Metaweb Query Language (MQL) as a data query and manipulation language. MQL provides an easy-to-use object-oriented interface to the tuple data in Freebase and is designed to facilitate the creation of collaborative, Web-based data-oriented applications. Kurt Bollacker, Colin Evans, Praveen K. Paritosh, Tim Sturge, Jamie Taylor |
SIGMOD Conference | 3 |
| 2005 | Analysis of Strategic Knowledge in Back of the Envelope Reasoning
Praveen K. Paritosh, Kenneth D. Forbus |
AAAI | 1 |