Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eugene J. Rollins

dblp:27/6432 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 50% Program analysis · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization › dependence analysis
program dependence graph
0.011994
A New Model of Program Dependences for Reverse Engineering · SIGSOFT FSE 1994
Program analysis › static analysis
program slicing
0.011994
A New Model of Program Dependences for Reverse Engineering · SIGSOFT FSE 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph traversal · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 A New Model of Program Dependences for Reverse Engineering
abstract
A dependence model for reverse engineering should treat procedures in a modular fashion and should be fine-grained, distinguishing dependences that are due to different variables. The program dependence graph (PDG) satisfies neither of these criteria. We present a new form of dependence graph that satisfies both, while retaining the advantages of the PDG: it is easy to construct and allows program slicing to be implemented as a simple graph traversal. We define 'chopping', a generalization of slicing that can express most of its variants, and show that, using our dependence graph, it produces more accurate results than algorithms based directly on the PDG.
Daniel Jackson 0001, Eugene J. Rollins
SIGSOFT FSE2
1991 Specifications as Search Keys for Software Libraries
Eugene J. Rollins, Jeannette M. Wing
ICLP1