Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Osamu Nishiguchi

dblp:27/6463 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Routing and switching · 62% Internet architecture and protocols · 19% Network performance modeling · 19%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching › routing
hierarchical routing
0.011989
An Adaptive Hierarchical Routing Protocol · IEEE Trans. Computers 1989
Internet architecture and protocols
protocol design
0.011989
An Adaptive Hierarchical Routing Protocol · IEEE Trans. Computers 1989
Network performance modeling › network simulation
routing protocol simulation
0.011989
An Adaptive Hierarchical Routing Protocol · IEEE Trans. Computers 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 An Adaptive Hierarchical Routing Protocol
abstract
An adaptive hierarchical routing protocol based on the extension of the new Arpanet scheme is proposed and its simulated performance is presented. The protocol can adapt to rapidly changing environments and works for arbitrarily large networks. A number of existing schemes as well as the proposed scheme are simulated under many different environments and clustering structures. The proposed protocol is found to be superior to the other protocols tested in many different types of network traffic and topological configurations. The results indicate that intercluster links must be reliable, because (1) the failure of these links can significantly degrade the routing performance, even though the protocol does not degrade as badly as the existing scheme and (2) hierarchical routing protocols usually prefer small clusters, which means that there will be many intercluster links. The tradeoff between two conflicting performance criteria, response speed and communication overhead, is shown.>
Wei-Tek Tsai, C. V. Ramamoorthy, Wei Kang Tsai, Osamu Nishiguchi
IEEE Trans. Computers4