Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

P. F. Brown

dblp:27/6883 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 67% Language models and text generation · 33%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
assembly planning
0.011998
Micro Planning for Mechanical Assembly Operations · ICRA 1998
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › sentence planning
microplanning
0.011998
Micro Planning for Mechanical Assembly Operations · ICRA 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tool selection · 0.0assembly tool modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Micro Planning for Mechanical Assembly Operations
abstract
Significant advances have been made in the area of macro-planning for assembly operations (i.e.,, dividing a product into sub-assemblies, determining the sequence of assembly operations). On the contrary, the state of the art in micro-planning (i.e., tool selection, path planning for tool and part movements) is rather primitive. To generate a realizable assembly plan, both macro-planning and micro-planning problems need to be solved. Tooling considerations are an important component of the micro-planning problem. Therefore, we present a methodology for modeling assembly tools, selecting tools for assembly operations, and generating detailed tool movements. Techniques described in this paper can be combined with macro-planning techniques to result in a complete assembly planner.
Christiaan J. J. Paredis, P. F. Brown
ICRA3