Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maria Dubovitskaya

dblp:27/7561 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 11 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
5 papers
Authentication and access control · 52% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 28% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 16%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control
anonymous credentials
0.522017
Practical UC-Secure Delegatable Credentials with Attributes and Their Application to Blockchain · CCS 2017
Composable and Modular Anonymous Credentials: Definitions and Practical Constructions · ASIACRYPT (2) 2015
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › pairing-based cryptography
structure-preserving cryptography
0.412019
On the Impossibility of Structure-Preserving Deterministic Primitives · J. Cryptol. 2019
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › composable security
universally composable security
0.322016
UC Commitments for Modular Protocol Design and Applications to Revocation and Attribute Tokens · CRYPTO (3) 2016
Composable and Modular Anonymous Credentials: Definitions and Practical Constructions · ASIACRYPT (2) 2015
Authentication and access control › anonymous credentials
delegatable credentials
0.312017
Practical UC-Secure Delegatable Credentials with Attributes and Their Application to Blockchain · CCS 2017
Authentication and access control › anonymous credentials
attribute-based credentials
0.212016
UC Commitments for Modular Protocol Design and Applications to Revocation and Attribute Tokens · CRYPTO (3) 2016
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › commitment schemes
universally composable commitment
0.212016
UC Commitments for Modular Protocol Design and Applications to Revocation and Attribute Tokens · CRYPTO (3) 2016
Authentication and access control
access control
0.112009
Oblivious transfer with access control · CCS 2009
Privacy and data protection › anonymity
anonymous access
0.112009
Oblivious transfer with access control · CCS 2009
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
oblivious transfer
0.112009
Oblivious transfer with access control · CCS 2009
Authentication and access control › anonymous credentials
privacy-preserving credential
0.112017
Practical UC-Secure Delegatable Credentials with Attributes and Their Application to Blockchain · CCS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

universally composable security · 0.3attribute certification · 0.3universal composability · 0.2modular protocol design · 0.2cryptographic protocol design · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Concise UC Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Oblivious Updatable Databases
abstract
We propose an ideal functionalityFCDand a construction ΠCDfor oblivious and updatable committed databases.FCDallows a proverPto read, write, and update values in a database and to prove to a verifierVin zero-knowledge (ZK) that a value is read from or written into a certain position. The following properties must hold: (1) values stored in the database remain hidden fromV; (2) a value read from a certain position is equal to the value previously written into that position; (3) (obliviousness) both the value read or written and its position remain hidden fromV.ΠCDis based on vector commitments. After the initialization phase, the cost of read and write operations is independent of the database size, outperforming other techniques that achieve cost sublinear in the dataset size for prover and/or verifier. Therefore, our construction is especially appealing for large datasets. In existing “commit-and-prove” two-party protocols, the task of maintaining a committed database betweenPandVand reading and writing values into it is not separated from the task of proving statements about the values read or written.FCDallows us to improve modularity in protocol design by separating those tasks. In comparison to simply using a commitment scheme to maintain a committed database,FCDallowsPto hide efficiently the positions read or written fromV. Thanks to this property, we design protocols for e.g. privacy-preserving e-commerce and location-based services whereVgathers aggregate statistics about the statements thatPproves in ZK.
Jan Camenisch, Maria Dubovitskaya, Alfredo Rial
CSF2
2020 Privacy-preserving auditable token payments in a permissioned blockchain system
abstract
Token payment systems were the first application of blockchain technology and are still the most widely used one. Early implementations of such systems, like Bitcoin or Ethereum, provide virtually no privacy beyond basic pseudonymity: all transactions are written in plain to the blockchain, which makes them linkable and traceable.
Elli Androulaki, Jan Camenisch, Angelo De Caro, Maria Dubovitskaya, Kaoutar Elkhiyaoui, Björn Tackmann
AFT4
2019 Managing Security Objects and -Processes Using an Extended BPM Approach and -System
abstract
One important use case for (business) process technology is process compliance. We propose that managing security objects such as cryptographic keys is an application domain that can greatly benefit from using process technology because of a critical compliance requirement. To this end, we present a BPMN extension and a design of a support system for key management processes. Both were driven by a case study on a distributed application using a standard hierarchical public key infrastructure, which we also present. Our prototypical implementation of the support system shows that process compliance for security object management processes can be substantially supported with moderate effort by extending the standard process technology.
Jochen Malte Küster, Niklaus Meyer, Hagen Völzer, Maria Dubovitskaya, Michael Osborne, Axel Tanner
EDOC4
2019 Efficient Fully Secure Leakage-Deterring Encryption
Jan Camenisch, Maria Dubovitskaya, Patrick Towa
IMACC2
2019 On the Impossibility of Structure-Preserving Deterministic Primitives
Masayuki Abe, Jan Camenisch, Rafael Dowsley, Maria Dubovitskaya
J. Cryptol.4
2017 Practical UC-Secure Delegatable Credentials with Attributes and Their Application to Blockchain
abstract
Certification of keys and attributes is in practice typically realized by a hierarchy of issuers. Revealing the full chain of issuers for certificate verification, however, can be a privacy issue since it can leak sensitive information about the issuer's organizational structure or about the certificate owner. Delegatable anonymous credentials solve this problem and allow one to hide the full delegation (issuance) chain, providing privacy during both delegation and presentation of certificates. However, the existing delegatable credentials schemes are not efficient enough for practical use.
Jan Camenisch, Manu Drijvers, Maria Dubovitskaya
CCS3
2017 Accumulators with Applications to Anonymity-Preserving Revocation
abstract
Membership revocation is essential for cryptographic applications, from traditional PKIs to group signatures and anonymous credentials. Of the various solutions for the revocation problem that have been explored, dynamic accumulators are one of the most promising. We propose Braavos, a new, RSA-based, dynamic accumulator. It has optimal communication complexity and, when combined with efficient zero-knowledge proofs, provides an ideal solution for anonymous revocation. For the construction of Braavos we use a modular approach: we show how to build an accumulator with better functionality and security from accumulators with fewer features and weaker security guarantees. We then describe an anonymous revocation component (ARC) that can be instantiated using any dynamic accumulator. ARC can be added to any anonymous system, such as anonymous credentials or group signatures, in order to equip it with a revocation functionality. Finally, we implement ARC with Braavos and plug it into Idemix, the leading implementation of anonymous credentials. This work resolves, for the first time, the problem of practical revocation for anonymous credential systems.
Foteini Baldimtsi, Jan Camenisch, Maria Dubovitskaya, Anna Lysyanskaya, Leonid Reyzin, Kai Samelin, Sophia Yakoubov
EuroS&P3
2016 UC Commitments for Modular Protocol Design and Applications to Revocation and Attribute Tokens
Jan Camenisch, Maria Dubovitskaya, Alfredo Rial
CRYPTO (3)2
2015 Composable and Modular Anonymous Credentials: Definitions and Practical Constructions
Jan Camenisch, Maria Dubovitskaya, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Markulf Kohlweiss
ASIACRYPT (2)2
2014 On the Impossibility of Structure-Preserving Deterministic Primitives
Masayuki Abe, Jan Camenisch, Rafael Dowsley, Maria Dubovitskaya
TCC4
2014 Concepts and languages for privacy-preserving attribute-based authentication
Jan Camenisch, Maria Dubovitskaya, Robert R. Enderlein, Anja Lehmann, Gregory Neven, Christian Paquin, Franz-Stefan Preiss
J. Inf. Secur. Appl.2
2009 Oblivious transfer with access control
abstract
We present a protocol for anonymous access to a database where the different records have different access control permissions. These permissions could be attributes, roles, or rights that the user needs to have in order to access the record. Our protocol offers maximal security guarantees for both the database and the user, namely (1) only authorized users can access the record; (2) the database provider does not learn which record the user accesses; and (3) the database provider does not learn which attributes or roles the user has when she accesses the database.
Jan Camenisch, Maria Dubovitskaya, Gregory Neven
CCS2