Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joshua W. Brown

dblp:27/841 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-3226-6360ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
goal-driven learning
0.812024
Goal Reduction with Loop-Removal Accelerates RL and Models Human Brain Activity in Goal-Directed Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning
0.812024
Goal Reduction with Loop-Removal Accelerates RL and Models Human Brain Activity in Goal-Directed Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning › option discovery
subgoal discovery
0.812024
Goal Reduction with Loop-Removal Accelerates RL and Models Human Brain Activity in Goal-Directed Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Computational science and engineering › computational cognitive science
cognitive modeling
0.212024
Goal Reduction with Loop-Removal Accelerates RL and Models Human Brain Activity in Goal-Directed Learning · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

soft actor-critic · 1.5replay buffer distillation · 1.5deep q-learning · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Replay as a Basis for Backpropagation Through Time in the Brain
abstract
How episodic memories are formed in the brain is a continuing puzzle for the neuroscience community. The brain areas that are critical for episodic learning (e.g., the hippocampus) are characterized by recurrent connectivity and generate frequent offline replay events. The function of the replay events is a subject of active debate. Recurrent connectivity, computational simulations show, enables sequence learning when combined with a suitable learning algorithm such as backpropagation through time (BPTT). BPTT, however, is not biologically plausible. We describe here, for the first time, a biologically plausible variant of BPTT in a reversible recurrent neural network, R2N2, that critically leverages offline replay to support episodic learning. The model uses forward and backward offline replay to transfer information between two recurrent neural networks, a cache and a consolidator, that perform rapid one-shot learning and statistical learning, respectively. Unlike replay in standard BPTT, this architecture requires no artificial external memory store. This approach outperforms existing solutions like random feedback local online learning and reservoir network. It also accounts for the functional significance of hippocampal replay events. We demonstrate the R2N2 network properties using benchmark tests from computer science and simulate the rodent delayed alternation T-maze task.
Huzi Cheng, Joshua W. Brown
Neural Comput.2
2024 Goal Reduction with Loop-Removal Accelerates RL and Models Human Brain Activity in Goal-Directed Learning
abstract
Goal-directed planning presents a challenge for classical RL algorithms due to the vastness of the combinatorial state and goal spaces, while humans and animals adapt to complex environments, especially with diverse, non-stationary objectives, often employing intermediate goals for long-horizon tasks. Here, we propose a goal reduction mechanism for effectively deriving subgoals from arbitrary and distant original goals, using a novel loop-removal technique. The product of the method, called goal-reducer, distills high-quality subgoals from a replay buffer, all without the need for prior global environmental knowledge. Simulations show that the goal-reducer can be integrated into RL frameworks like Deep Q-learning and Soft Actor-Critic. It accelerates performance in both discrete and continuous action space tasks, such as grid world navigation and robotic arm manipulation, relative to the corresponding standard RL models. Moreover, the goal-reducer, when combined with a local policy, without iterative training, outperforms its integrated deep RL counterparts in solving a navigation task. This goal reduction mechanism also models human problem-solving. Comparing the model's performance and activation with human behavior and fMRI data in a treasure hunting task, we found matching representational patterns between an goal-reducer agent's components and corresponding human brain areas, particularly the vmPFC and basal ganglia. The results suggest that humans may use a similar computational framework for goal-directed behaviors.
Huzi Cheng, Joshua W. Brown
NeurIPS2
2015 Hierarchical Error Representation: A Computational Model of Anterior Cingulate and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
abstract
Anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (ACC and dlPFC, respectively) are core components of the cognitive control network. Activation of these regions is routinely observed in tasks that involve monitoring the external environment and maintaining information in order to generate appropriate responses. Despite the ubiquity of studies reporting coactivation of these two regions, a consensus on how they interact to support cognitive control has yet to emerge. In this letter, we present a new hypothesis and computational model of ACC and dlPFC. The error representation hypothesis states that multidimensional error signals generated by ACC in response to surprising outcomes are used to train representations of expected error in dlPFC, which are then associated with relevant task stimuli. Error representations maintained in dlPFC are in turn used to modulate predictive activity in ACC in order to generate better estimates of the likely outcomes of actions. We formalize the error representation hypothesis in a new computational model based on our previous model of ACC. The hierarchical error representation (HER) model of ACC/dlPFC suggests a mechanism by which hierarchically organized layers within ACC and dlPFC interact in order to solve sophisticated cognitive tasks. In a series of simulations, we demonstrate the ability of the HER model to autonomously learn to perform structured tasks in a manner comparable to human performance, and we show that the HER model outperforms current deep learning networks by an order of magnitude.
William H. Alexander, Joshua W. Brown
Neural Comput.2
2012 Emotion-Based Reinforcement Learning
Woo-Young Ahn, Olga Rass, Yongwook Shin, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Joshua W. Brown, Brian F. O'Donnell
CogSci5
2010 Hyperbolically Discounted Temporal Difference Learning
abstract
Hyperbolic discounting of future outcomes is widely observed to underlie choice behavior in animals. Additionally, recent studies (Kobayashi & Schultz, 2008) have reported that hyperbolic discounting is observed even in neural systems underlying choice. However, the most prevalent models of temporal discounting, such as temporal difference learning, assume that future outcomes are discounted exponentially. Exponential discounting has been preferred largely because it can be expressed recursively, whereas hyperbolic discounting has heretofore been thought not to have a recursive definition. In this letter, we define a learning algorithm, hyperbolically discounted temporal difference (HDTD) learning, which constitutes a recursive formulation of the hyperbolic model.
William H. Alexander, Joshua W. Brown
Neural Comput.2
2006 Computational and neural mechanisms of task switching
Jeremy R. Reynolds, Todd S. Braver, Joshua W. Brown, Stefan Van der Stigchel
Neurocomputing3
2004 How laminar frontal cortex and basal ganglia circuits interact to control planned and reactive saccades
Joshua W. Brown, Daniel Bullock, Stephen Grossberg
Neural Networks1