Sam Bond-Taylor

dblp:270/0020 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1538-7909ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Generative modeling · 68% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% 3D vision · 10%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
2.132024
∞-Diff: Infinite Resolution Diffusion with Subsampled Mollified States · ICLR 2024
RadEdit: Stress-Testing Biomedical Vision Models via Diffusion Image Editing · ECCV (12) 2024
Unleashing Transformers: Parallel Token Prediction with Discrete Absorbing Diffusion for Fast High-Resolution Image Generation from Vector-Quantized Codes · ECCV (23) 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › score-based generative model
continuous-time diffusion
0.812024
∞-Diff: Infinite Resolution Diffusion with Subsampled Mollified States · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › image editing
diffusion-based image editing
0.812024
RadEdit: Stress-Testing Biomedical Vision Models via Diffusion Image Editing · ECCV (12) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
RadEdit: Stress-Testing Biomedical Vision Models via Diffusion Image Editing · ECCV (12) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › model robustness evaluation
stress testing
0.812024
RadEdit: Stress-Testing Biomedical Vision Models via Diffusion Image Editing · ECCV (12) 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.712023
Unaligned 2D to 3D Translation with Conditional Vector-Quantized Code Diffusion using Transformers · ICCV 2023
Visual content generation and editing
3d content generation
0.712023
Unaligned 2D to 3D Translation with Conditional Vector-Quantized Code Diffusion using Transformers · ICCV 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model
0.612022
Deep Generative Modelling: A Comparative Review of VAEs, GANs, Normalizing Flows, Energy-Based and Autoregressive Models · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model
0.612022
Deep Generative Modelling: A Comparative Review of VAEs, GANs, Normalizing Flows, Energy-Based and Autoregressive Models · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.612022
Deep Generative Modelling: A Comparative Review of VAEs, GANs, Normalizing Flows, Energy-Based and Autoregressive Models · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation
0.612022
Unleashing Transformers: Parallel Token Prediction with Discrete Absorbing Diffusion for Fast High-Resolution Image Generation from Vector-Quantized Codes · ECCV (23) 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
0.612022
Deep Generative Modelling: A Comparative Review of VAEs, GANs, Normalizing Flows, Energy-Based and Autoregressive Models · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency
0.612022
Unleashing Transformers: Parallel Token Prediction with Discrete Absorbing Diffusion for Fast High-Resolution Image Generation from Vector-Quantized Codes · ECCV (23) 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.612022
Deep Generative Modelling: A Comparative Review of VAEs, GANs, Normalizing Flows, Energy-Based and Autoregressive Models · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
implicit generative model
0.512021
Gradient Origin Networks · ICLR 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision
implicit neural representation
0.512021
Gradient Origin Networks · ICLR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

diffusion model · 2.1vector quantization · 1.3transformer · 1.3subsampled states · 0.8mollified states · 0.8image editing · 0.8vector-quantized codes · 0.6parallel token prediction · 0.6discrete absorbing diffusion · 0.6gradient-based latent representation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 RadEdit: Stress-Testing Biomedical Vision Models via Diffusion Image Editing
Fernando Pérez-García, Sam Bond-Taylor, Pedro P. Sanchez, Boris van Breugel, Daniel C. Castro, Harshita Sharma, Valentina Salvatelli, Maria Wetscherek, Hannah Richardson, Matthew P. Lungren, Aditya V. Nori, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Ozan Oktay, Maximilian Ilse
ECCV (12)2
2024 ∞-Diff: Infinite Resolution Diffusion with Subsampled Mollified States
Sam Bond-Taylor, Chris G. Willcocks
ICLR1
2023 Unaligned 2D to 3D Translation with Conditional Vector-Quantized Code Diffusion using Transformers
abstract
Generating 3D images of complex objects conditionally from a few 2D views is a difficult synthesis problem, compounded by issues such as domain gap and geometric misalignment. For instance, a unified framework such as Generative Adversarial Networks cannot achieve this unless they explicitly define both a domain-invariant and geometric-invariant joint latent distribution, whereas Neural Radiance Fields are generally unable to handle both issues as they optimize at the pixel level. By contrast, we propose a simple and novel 2D to 3D synthesis approach based on conditional diffusion with vector-quantized codes. Operating in an information-rich code space enables high-resolution 3D synthesis via full-coverage attention across the views. Specifically, we generate the 3D codes (e.g. for CT images) conditional on previously generated 3D codes and the entire codebook of two 2D views (e.g. 2D X-rays). Qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate state-of-the-art performance over specialized methods across varied evaluation criteria, including fidelity metrics such as density, coverage, and distortion metrics for two complex volumetric imagery datasets from in real-world scenarios.
Abril Corona-Figueroa, Sam Bond-Taylor, Neelanjan Bhowmik, Yona Falinie Binti A. Gaus, Toby P. Breckon, Hubert P. H. Shum, Chris G. Willcocks
ICCV2
2022 Unleashing Transformers: Parallel Token Prediction with Discrete Absorbing Diffusion for Fast High-Resolution Image Generation from Vector-Quantized Codes
Sam Bond-Taylor, Peter Hessey, Hiroshi Sasaki 0009, Toby P. Breckon, Chris G. Willcocks
ECCV (23)1
2022 Deep Generative Modelling: A Comparative Review of VAEs, GANs, Normalizing Flows, Energy-Based and Autoregressive Models
abstract
Deep generative models are a class of techniques that train deep neural networks to model the distribution of training samples. Research has fragmented into various interconnected approaches, each of which make trade-offs including run-time, diversity, and architectural restrictions. In particular, this compendium covers energy-based models, variational autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, autoregressive models, normalizing flows, in addition to numerous hybrid approaches. These techniques are compared and contrasted, explaining the premises behind each and how they are interrelated, while reviewing current state-of-the-art advances and implementations.
Sam Bond-Taylor, Adam Leach, Yang Long 0001, Chris G. Willcocks
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2021 Gradient Origin Networks
Sam Bond-Taylor, Chris G. Willcocks
ICLR1
2020 Shape tracing: An extension of sphere tracing for 3D non-convex collision in protein docking
abstract
This paper presents an algorithm, similar to implicit sphere tracing, that ray marches 3D non-convex shapes for efficient collision detection. Instead of finding points on the surface where individual rays strike, an entire shape is marched in unison by a lower bound of the boundary distance, calculated at the closest point between the two surfaces. Advancing one shape towards the other by this new bound allows us to identify a contact in few steps. This method supports arbitrary nonconvex shapes, and can be run in parallel. We apply this to protein-protein docking and show that we can identify around 80 docking poses per second featuring contact but no overlap, irrespective of proteins' specific geometry. This paves the way to future fast docking algorithms, building upon implicit surface representations to quickly find a well-distributed subset of close candidate solutions for further investigation.
Adam Leach, Lucas S. P. Rudden, Sam Bond-Taylor, John C. Brigham, Matteo T. Degiacomi, Chris G. Willcocks
BIBE3