Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bryn Elesedy

dblp:270/2875 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 75% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
1.022021
Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Invariance in Kernel Methods · NeurIPS 2021
Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant Models · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
equivariance
0.512021
Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant Models · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kernel ridge regression · 0.5group theory · 0.5group representation theory · 0.5feature averaging · 0.5averaging operators · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant Models
abstract
It is widely believed that engineering a model to be invariant/equivariant improves generalisation. Despite the growing popularity of this approach, a precise characterisation of the generalisation benefit is lacking. By considering the simplest case of linear models, this paper provides the first provably non-zero improvement in generalisation for invariant/equivariant models when the target distribution is invariant/equivariant with respect to a compact group. Moreover, our work reveals an interesting relationship between generalisation, the number of training examples and properties of the group action. Our results rest on an observation of the structure of function spaces under averaging operators which, along with its consequences for feature averaging, may be of independent interest.
Bryn Elesedy, Sheheryar Zaidi
ICML1
2021 Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Invariance in Kernel Methods
abstract
It is a commonly held belief that enforcing invariance improves generalisation. Although this approach enjoys widespread popularity, it is only very recently that a rigorous theoretical demonstration of this benefit has been established. In this work we build on the function space perspective of Elesedy and Zaidi [8] to derive a strictly non-zero generalisation benefit of incorporating invariance in kernel ridge regression when the target is invariant to the action of a compact group. We study invariance enforced by feature averaging and find that generalisation is governed by a notion of effective dimension that arises from the interplay between the kernel and the group. In building towards this result, we find that the action of the group induces an orthogonal decomposition of both the reproducing kernel Hilbert space and its kernel, which may be of interest in its own right.
Bryn Elesedy
NeurIPS1