Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bryn Elesedy
dblp:270/2875
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 75% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
1.0 | 2 | 2021 | Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Invariance in Kernel Methods · NeurIPS 2021 Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
equivariance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant Models · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
kernel ridge regression · 0.5group theory · 0.5group representation theory · 0.5feature averaging · 0.5averaging operators · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant ModelsabstractIt is widely believed that engineering a model to be invariant/equivariant improves generalisation. Despite the growing popularity of this approach, a precise characterisation of the generalisation benefit is lacking. By considering the simplest case of linear models, this paper provides the first provably non-zero improvement in generalisation for invariant/equivariant models when the target distribution is invariant/equivariant with respect to a compact group. Moreover, our work reveals an interesting relationship between generalisation, the number of training examples and properties of the group action. Our results rest on an observation of the structure of function spaces under averaging operators which, along with its consequences for feature averaging, may be of independent interest. Bryn Elesedy, Sheheryar Zaidi |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Invariance in Kernel MethodsabstractIt is a commonly held belief that enforcing invariance improves generalisation. Although this approach enjoys widespread popularity, it is only very recently that a rigorous theoretical demonstration of this benefit has been established. In this work we build on the function space perspective of Elesedy and Zaidi [8] to derive a strictly non-zero generalisation benefit of incorporating invariance in kernel ridge regression when the target is invariant to the action of a compact group. We study invariance enforced by feature averaging and find that generalisation is governed by a notion of effective dimension that arises from the interplay between the kernel and the group. In building towards this result, we find that the action of the group induces an orthogonal decomposition of both the reproducing kernel Hilbert space and its kernel, which may be of interest in its own right. Bryn Elesedy |
NeurIPS | 1 |