Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vladislav Skripniuk
dblp:270/2999
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 55% Security and privacy of machine learning · 45% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
generative model security |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Responsible Disclosure of Generative Models Using Scalable Fingerprinting · ICLR 2022 Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › trustworthy generative modeling
model attribution |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Responsible Disclosure of Generative Models Using Scalable Fingerprinting · ICLR 2022 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection › model ownership verification
model fingerprinting |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Responsible Disclosure of Generative Models Using Scalable Fingerprinting · ICLR 2022 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › source attribution
deepfake attribution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data · ICCV 2021 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
deepfake detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data · ICCV 2021 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › synthetic media forensics
synthetic image attribution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data · ICCV 2021 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fingerprinting · 1.1generative adversarial network · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Responsible Disclosure of Generative Models Using Scalable Fingerprinting
Ning Yu 0006, Vladislav Skripniuk, Dingfan Chen, Larry Davis 0001, Mario Fritz |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training DataabstractPhotorealistic image generation has reached a new level of quality due to the breakthroughs of generative adversarial networks (GANs). Yet, the dark side of such deepfakes, the malicious use of generated media, raises concerns about visual misinformation. While existing research work on deepfake detection demonstrates high accuracy, it is subject to advances in generation techniques and adversarial iterations on detection countermeasure techniques. Thus, we seek a proactive and sustainable solution on deepfake detection, that is agnostic to the evolution of generative models, by introducing artificial fingerprints into the models.Our approach is simple and effective. We first embed artificial fingerprints into training data, then validate a surprising discovery on the transferability of such fingerprints from training data to generative models, which in turn appears in the generated deepfakes. Experiments show that our fingerprinting solution (1) holds for a variety of cutting-edge generative models, (2) leads to a negligible side effect on generation quality, (3) stays robust against image-level and model-level perturbations, (4) stays hard to be detected by adversaries, and (5) converts deepfake detection and attribution into trivial tasks and outperforms the recent state-of-the-art baselines. Our solution closes the responsibility loop between publishing pre-trained generative model inventions and their possible misuses, which makes it independent of the current arms race. Ning Yu 0006, Vladislav Skripniuk, Sahar Abdelnabi, Mario Fritz |
ICCV | 2 |