Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vladislav Skripniuk

dblp:270/2999 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Digital forensics and information hiding · 55% Security and privacy of machine learning · 45%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning
generative model security
1.122022
Responsible Disclosure of Generative Models Using Scalable Fingerprinting · ICLR 2022
Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data · ICCV 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling › trustworthy generative modeling
model attribution
0.612022
Responsible Disclosure of Generative Models Using Scalable Fingerprinting · ICLR 2022
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection › model ownership verification
model fingerprinting
0.612022
Responsible Disclosure of Generative Models Using Scalable Fingerprinting · ICLR 2022
Digital forensics and information hiding › source attribution
deepfake attribution
0.512021
Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data · ICCV 2021
Digital forensics and information hiding
deepfake detection
0.512021
Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data · ICCV 2021
Digital forensics and information hiding › synthetic media forensics
synthetic image attribution
0.512021
Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data · ICCV 2021
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking
0.512021
Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data · ICCV 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fingerprinting · 1.1generative adversarial network · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Responsible Disclosure of Generative Models Using Scalable Fingerprinting
Ning Yu 0006, Vladislav Skripniuk, Dingfan Chen, Larry Davis 0001, Mario Fritz
ICLR2
2021 Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data
abstract
Photorealistic image generation has reached a new level of quality due to the breakthroughs of generative adversarial networks (GANs). Yet, the dark side of such deepfakes, the malicious use of generated media, raises concerns about visual misinformation. While existing research work on deepfake detection demonstrates high accuracy, it is subject to advances in generation techniques and adversarial iterations on detection countermeasure techniques. Thus, we seek a proactive and sustainable solution on deepfake detection, that is agnostic to the evolution of generative models, by introducing artificial fingerprints into the models.Our approach is simple and effective. We first embed artificial fingerprints into training data, then validate a surprising discovery on the transferability of such fingerprints from training data to generative models, which in turn appears in the generated deepfakes. Experiments show that our fingerprinting solution (1) holds for a variety of cutting-edge generative models, (2) leads to a negligible side effect on generation quality, (3) stays robust against image-level and model-level perturbations, (4) stays hard to be detected by adversaries, and (5) converts deepfake detection and attribution into trivial tasks and outperforms the recent state-of-the-art baselines. Our solution closes the responsibility loop between publishing pre-trained generative model inventions and their possible misuses, which makes it independent of the current arms race.
Ning Yu 0006, Vladislav Skripniuk, Sahar Abdelnabi, Mario Fritz
ICCV2