Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jan Niklas Böhm

dblp:270/9446 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
2.232025
TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscience · NeurIPS 2025
From $t$-SNE to UMAP with contrastive learning · ICLR 2023
Unsupervised visualization of image datasets using contrastive learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
t-SNE
1.222023
From $t$-SNE to UMAP with contrastive learning · ICLR 2023
Attraction-Repulsion Spectrum in Neighbor Embeddings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Visualization and visual analytics
dimensionality reduction
1.222023
Unsupervised visualization of image datasets using contrastive learning · ICLR 2023
Attraction-Repulsion Spectrum in Neighbor Embeddings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis
0.912025
TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscience · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
neural population decoding
0.912025
TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscience · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction
0.712023
From $t$-SNE to UMAP with contrastive learning · ICLR 2023
Visualization and visual analytics › dimensionality reduction
neighbor embedding
0.612022
Attraction-Repulsion Spectrum in Neighbor Embeddings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contrastive learning · 3.7neighbor embedding · 1.7t-SNE · 1.3negative sampling · 1.1attractive-repulsive force · 1.1hypersphere embedding · 0.9cosine similarity · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 On the Importance of Embedding Norms in Self-Supervised Learning
abstract
Self-supervised learning (SSL) allows training data representations without a supervised signal and has become an important paradigm in machine learning. Most SSL methods employ the cosine similarity between embedding vectors and hence effectively embed data on a hypersphere. While this seemingly implies that embedding norms cannot play any role in SSL, a few recent works have suggested that embedding norms have properties related to network convergence and confidence. In this paper, we resolve this apparent contradiction and systematically establish the embedding norm's role in SSL training. Using theoretical analysis, simulations, and experiments, we show that embedding norms (i) govern SSL convergence rates and (ii) encode network confidence, with smaller norms corresponding to unexpected samples. Additionally, we show that manipulating embedding norms can have large effects on convergence speed. Our findings demonstrate that SSL embedding norms are integral to understanding and optimizing network behavior.
Andrew Draganov, Sharvaree Vadgama, Sebastian Damrich, Jan Niklas Böhm, Lucas Maes, Dmitry Kobak, Erik J. Bekkers
ICML4
2025 TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscience
abstract
Modern neural recording techniques such as two-photon imaging or Neuropixel probes allow to acquire vast time-series datasets with responses of hundreds or thousands of neurons. Contrastive learning is a powerful self-supervised framework for learning representations of complex datasets. Existing applications for neural time series rely on generic data augmentations and do not exploit the multi-trial data structure inherent in many neural datasets. Here we present TRACE, a new contrastive learning framework that averages across different subsets of trials to generate positive pairs. TRACE allows to directly learn a two-dimensional embedding, combining ideas from contrastive learning and neighbor embeddings. We show that TRACE outperforms other methods, resolving fine response differences in simulated data. Further, using in vivo recordings, we show that the representations learned by TRACE capture both biologically relevant continuous variation, cell-type-related cluster structure, and can assist data quality control.
Lisa Schmors, Dominic Gonschorek, Jan Niklas Böhm, Yongrong Qiu, Na Zhou, Dmitry Kobak, Andreas S. Tolias, Fabian H. Sinz, Jacob Reimer, Katrin Franke, Sebastian Damrich, Philipp Berens
NeurIPS3
2023 Unsupervised visualization of image datasets using contrastive learning
Jan Niklas Böhm, Philipp Berens, Dmitry Kobak
ICLR1
2023 From $t$-SNE to UMAP with contrastive learning
Sebastian Damrich, Jan Niklas Böhm, Fred A. Hamprecht, Dmitry Kobak
ICLR2
2022 Attraction-Repulsion Spectrum in Neighbor Embeddings
abstract
Neighbor embeddings are a family of methods for visualizing complex high-dimensional data sets using kNN graphs. To find the low-dimensional embedding, these algorithms combine an attractive force between neighboring pairs of points with a repulsive force between all points. One of the most popular examples of such algorithms is t-SNE. Here we empirically show that changing the balance between the attractive and the repulsive forces in t-SNE using the exaggeration parameter yields a spectrum of embeddings, which is characterized by a simple trade-off: stronger attraction can better represent continuous manifold structures, while stronger repulsion can better represent discrete cluster structures and yields higher kNN recall. We find that UMAP embeddings correspond to t-SNE with increased attraction; mathematical analysis shows that this is because the negative sampling optimization strategy employed by UMAP strongly lowers the effective repulsion. Likewise, ForceAtlas2, commonly used for visualizing developmental single-cell transcriptomic data, yields embeddings corresponding to t-SNE with the attraction increased even more. At the extreme of this spectrum lie Laplacian eigenmaps. Our results demonstrate that many prominent neighbor embedding algorithms can be placed onto the attraction-repulsion spectrum, and highlight the inherent trade-offs between them.
Jan Niklas Böhm, Philipp Berens, Dmitry Kobak
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1