As the landscape of deep neural networks evolves, heterogeneous dataflow accelerators, in the form of multi-core architectures or chiplet-based designs, promise more flexibility and higher inference performance through scalability. So far, these systems exploit the increased parallelism by coarsely mapping a single layer at a time across cores, which incurs frequent costly off-chip memory accesses, or by pipelining batches of inputs, which falls short in meeting the demands of latency-critical applications. To alleviate these bottlenecks, this work explores a new fine-grain mapping paradigm, referred to as layer fusion, on heterogeneous dataflow accelerators through a novel design space exploration framework called Stream . Stream captures a wide variety of heterogeneous dataflow architectures and mapping granularities, and implements a memory and communication-aware latency and energy analysis validated with three distinct state-of-the-art hardware implementations. As such, it facilitates a holistic exploration of architecture and mapping, by strategically allocating the workload through constraint optimization. The findings demonstrate that the integration of layer fusion with heterogeneous dataflow accelerators yields up to 2.2× lower energy-delay product in inference efficiency, addressing both energy consumption and latency concerns.

Hybrid vision transformers combine the elements of conventional neural networks (NN) and vision transformers (ViT) to enable lightweight and accurate detection. However, several challenges remain for their efficient deployment on resource-constrained edge devices. The hybrid models suffer from a widely diverse set of NN layer types and large intermediate data tensors, hampering efficient hardware acceleration. To enable their execution at the edge, this paper proposes innovations across the hardware-scheduling stack: a.) At the lowest level, a configurable PE array supports all hybrid ViT layer types; b.) temporal loop re-ordering within one layer, enabling hardware support for normalization and softmax layers, minimizing on-chip data transfers; c.) further scheduling optimization employs layer fusion across inverted bottleneck layers to drastically reduce off-chip memory transfers. The resulting accelerator is implemented in 28nm CMOS, achieving a peak energy efficiency of 1.39 TOPS/W at 25.6 GMACs/s.

In-Memory Computing (IMC) has emerged as a promising paradigm for energy-efficient, throughput-efficient and area-efficient machine learning at the edge. However, the differences in hardware architectures, array dimensions, and fabrication technologies among published IMC realizations have made it difficult to grasp their relative strengths. Moreover, previous studies have primarily focused on exploring and bench-marking the peak performance of a single IMC macro rather than full system performance on real workloads. This paper aims to address the lack of a quantitative comparison of Analog In-Memory Computing (AIMC) and Digital In-Memory Computing (DIMC) processor architectures. We propose an analytical IMC performance model that is validated against published implementations and integrated into a system-level exploration framework for comprehensive performance assessments on different work-loads with varying IMC configurations. Our experiments show that while DIMC generally has higher computational density than AIMC, AIMC with large macro sizes may have better energy efficiency than DIMC on convolutional-layers and pointwise-layers, which can exploit high spatial unrolling. On the other hand, DIMC with small macro size outperforms AIMC on depthwise-layers, which feature limited spatial unrolling opportunities inside a macro.

To keep up with the ever-growing performance demand of DNN processing, specialized hardware (HW) accelerators are shifting towards multi-core architectures. Stream is the first open-source design space exploration (DSE) framework for co-optimization of HW architecture and fine-grained scheduling of such multi-core DNN accelerators. Stream supports finegrained layer fusion, to optimally trade-off energy, latency, and/or on-chip memory footprint for constrained edge devices. Validation against three SotA chips, together with a case study on seven HW architectures with different scheduling granularity, demonstrate the reliability and capabilities of Stream. Results show that high-level architectural decisions greatly impact HW efficiency under the fine-grained scheduling paradigm, reducing the energy-delay product from $2.4 \times$ for single-core architectures to up to $30 \times$ for heterogeneous multi-core architectures compared to traditional scheduling at layer granularity. Stream is open-source at github.com/ZigZag-Project/stream.

Building efficient embedded deep learning systems requires a tight co-design between DNN algorithms, hardware, and algorithm-to-hardware mapping, a.k.a. dataflow. However, owing to the large joint design space, finding an optimal solution through physical implementation becomes infeasible. To tackle this problem, several design space exploration (DSE) frameworks have emerged recently, yet they either suffer from long runtimes or a limited exploration space. This article introduces ZigZag, a rapid DSE framework for DNN accelerator architecture and mapping. ZigZag extends the common DSE with uneven mapping opportunities and smart mapping search strategies. Uneven mapping decouples operands (W/I/O), memory hierarchy, and mappings (temporal/spatial), opening up a whole new space for DSE, and thus better design points are found by ZigZag compared to other SotAs. For this, ZigZag uses an enhanced nested-for-loop format as a uniform representation to integrate algorithm, accelerator, and algorithm-to-accelerator mapping. ZigZag consists of three key components: 1) an analytical energy-performance-area Hardware Cost Estimator, 2) two Mapping Search Engines that support spatial and temporal even/uneven mapping search, and 3) an Architecture Generator that auto-explores the wide memory hierarchy design space. Benchmarking experiments against published works, in-house accelerator, and existing DSE frameworks, together with three case studies, show the reliability and capability of ZigZag. Up to 64 percent more energy-efficient solutions are found compared to other SotAs, due to ZigZag's uneven mapping capabilities.