Soham Poddar, Paramita Koley, Janardan Misra, Niloy Ganguly, Saptarshi Ghosh. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.

The debate around vaccines has been going on for decades, but the COVID-19 pandemic showed how crucial it is to understand and mitigate anti-vaccine sentiments. While the pandemic may be over, it is still important to understand how the pandemic affected the anti-vaccine discourse, and whether the arguments against non-COVID vaccines have also changed due to the pandemic. This study attempts to answer these questions through a large-scale study of anti-vaccine posts on Twitter. Almost all prior works that utilized social media to understand anti-vaccine opinions considered only the three broad stances of Anti-Vax, Pro-Vax, and Neutral. There has not been any effort to identify the specific reasons/concerns behind the anti-vax sentiments (e.g., side-effects, conspiracy theories, political reasons) on social media at scale. In this work, we propose two novel methods for classifing tweets into 11 different anti-vax concerns -- a discriminative approach (entailment-based) and a generative approach (based on instruction tuning of LLMs) -- which outperform several strong baselines. We then apply this classifier on anti-vaccine tweets posted over a 5-year period (Jan 2018 - Jan 2023) to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the anti-vaccine concerns among the masses. We find that the pandemic has made the anti-vaccine discourse far more complex than in the pre-COVID times, and increased the variety of concerns being voiced. Alarmingly, we find that concerns about COVID vaccines are now being projected onto the non-COVID vaccines, thus making more people hesitant in taking them in post-COVID times.

While social media platforms play an important role in our daily lives in obtaining the latest news and trends from across the globe, they are known to be prone to widespread proliferation of harmful information in different forms leading to misconceptions among the masses. Accordingly, several prior works have attempted to tag social media posts with labels/classes reflecting their veracity, sentiments, hate content, and so on. However, in order to have a convincing impact, it is important to additionally extract the post snippets on which the labelling decision is based. We call such a post snippet the rationale . These rationales significantly improve human trust and debuggability of the predictions, especially when detecting misinformation or stigmas from social media posts. These rationale spans or snippets are also helpful in post-classification social analysis, such as for finding out the target communities in hate-speech, or for understanding the arguments or concerns against the intake of vaccines. Also it is observed that a post may express multiple notions of misinformation, hate, sentiment, and the like. Thus, the task of determining (one or multiple) labels for a given piece of text, along with the text snippets explaining the rationale behind each of the identified labels is a challenging multi-label, multi-rationale classification task, which is still nascent in the literature. While transformer -based encoder-decoder generative models such as BART and T5 are well suited for the task, in this work we show how a relatively simpler encoder-only discriminative question-answering (QA) model can be effectively trained using simple template-based questions to accomplish the task. We thus propose MuLX-QA and demonstrate its utility in producing (label, rationale span) pairs in two different settings: multi-class (on the HateXplain dataset related to hate speech on social media), and multi-label (on the CAVES dataset related to COVID-19 anti-vaccine concerns). MuLX-QA outperforms heavier generative models in both settings. We also demonstrate the relative advantage of our proposed model MuLX-QA over strong baselines when trained with limited data. We perform several ablation studies, and experiments to better understand the effect of training MuLX-QA with different question prompts, and draw interesting inferences. Additionally, we show that MuLX-QA is effective on social media posts in resource-poor non-English languages as well. Finally, we perform a qualitative analysis of our model predictions and compare them with those of our strongest baseline.

Convincing people to get vaccinated against COVID-19 is a key societal challenge in the present times. As a first step towards this goal, many prior works have relied on social media analysis to understand the specific concerns that people have towards these vaccines, such as potential side-effects, ineffectiveness, political factors, and so on. Though there are datasets that broadly classify social media posts into Anti-vax and Pro-Vax labels, there is no dataset (to our knowledge) that labels social media posts according to the specific anti-vaccine concerns mentioned in the posts. In this paper, we have curated CAVES, the first large-scale dataset containing about 10k COVID-19 anti-vaccine tweets labelled into various specific anti-vaccine concerns in a multi-label setting. This is also the first multi-label classification dataset that provides explanations for each of the labels. Additionally, the dataset also provides class-wise summaries of all the tweets. We also perform preliminary experiments on the dataset and show that this is a very challenging dataset for multi-label explainable classification and tweet summarization, as is evident by the moderate scores achieved by some state-of-the-art models.

Automatic summarization of legal case documents is an important and practical challenge. Apart from many domain-independent text summarization algorithms that can be used for this purpose, several algorithms have been developed specifically for summarizing legal case documents. However, most of the existing algorithms do not systematically incorporate domain knowledge that specifies what information should ideally be present in a legal case document summary. To address this gap, we propose an unsupervised summarization algorithm DELSumm which is designed to systematically incorporate guidelines from legal experts into an optimization setup. We conduct detailed experiments over case documents from the Indian Supreme Court. The experiments show that our proposed unsupervised method outperforms several strong baselines in terms of ROUGE scores, including both general summarization algorithms and legal-specific ones. In fact, though our proposed algorithm is unsupervised, it outperforms several supervised summarization models that are trained over thousands of document-summary pairs.