Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter Segin

dblp:271/5641 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1981
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 87% Information theory · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › source coding › lossless compression
run-length coding
0.011981
A Conditional Incremental-Runlength Code Based on Two-Dimensional Markov Model · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1981
Coding theory
source coding
0.011981
A Conditional Incremental-Runlength Code Based on Two-Dimensional Markov Model · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1981
Information theory › probability theory › stochastic processes › markov processes
markov model
0.011981
A Conditional Incremental-Runlength Code Based on Two-Dimensional Markov Model · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov modeling · 0.0entropy analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1981 A Conditional Incremental-Runlength Code Based on Two-Dimensional Markov Model
abstract
The conditional runlength code is known to be optimum for the Markov source model, but it is complicated in implementation and not efficient for practical line-based transmission. To avoid these disadvantages, a conditional incremental-runlength coding algorithm based on the same model is investigated. The entropy of the incremental runs is shown to be less than that of the runs, but additional information is required for the state identification. Yet, for a practical case with two composite states, the required state information is reduced so much that the new coding is shown to be better than the conditional runlength coding in line-based transmission. The coding efficiency is compared with some other well-known codes for the standard CCITT test documents. It is found to be one of the best codes, especially for the documents of high complexity.
Jae-Kyoon Kim, Peter Segin
IEEE Trans. Commun.2