Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xinzhi Dong

dblp:272/0692 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Vision and language · 51% Language models and text generation · 18% Graph learning · 16%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Rendering · 62% Virtual and augmented reality · 19% Visual content generation and editing · 19%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.912025
RBench: Graduate-level Multi-disciplinary Benchmarks for LLM & MLLM Complex Reasoning Evaluation · ICML 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal evaluation
0.912025
RBench: Graduate-level Multi-disciplinary Benchmarks for LLM & MLLM Complex Reasoning Evaluation · ICML 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal dialogue
multimodal intent recognition
0.912025
LLM-Guided Semantic Relational Reasoning for Multimodal Intent Recognition · EMNLP 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal reasoning
multimodal reasoning benchmark
0.912025
RBench: Graduate-level Multi-disciplinary Benchmarks for LLM & MLLM Complex Reasoning Evaluation · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph reasoning
semantic relation reasoning
0.912025
LLM-Guided Semantic Relational Reasoning for Multimodal Intent Recognition · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph convolutional network
dual graph convolutional network
0.512021
Dual Graph Convolutional Networks with Transformer and Curriculum Learning for Image Captioning · ACM Multimedia 2021
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network
0.512021
Dual Graph Convolutional Networks with Transformer and Curriculum Learning for Image Captioning · ACM Multimedia 2021
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning
0.512021
Dual Graph Convolutional Networks with Transformer and Curriculum Learning for Image Captioning · ACM Multimedia 2021
Rendering
shadow rendering
0.412020
ARShadowGAN: Shadow Generative Adversarial Network for Augmented Reality in Single Light Scenes · CVPR 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312025
LLM-Guided Semantic Relational Reasoning for Multimodal Intent Recognition · EMNLP 2025
Virtual and augmented reality
augmented reality
0.112020
ARShadowGAN: Shadow Generative Adversarial Network for Augmented Reality in Single Light Scenes · CVPR 2020
Visual content generation and editing › image editing › image compositing
object insertion
0.112020
ARShadowGAN: Shadow Generative Adversarial Network for Augmented Reality in Single Light Scenes · CVPR 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model evaluation · 0.9chain-of-thought · 0.9benchmark construction · 0.9transformer · 0.5graph convolutional network · 0.5curriculum learning · 0.5generative adversarial network · 0.4attention mechanism · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 LLM-Guided Semantic Relational Reasoning for Multimodal Intent Recognition
abstract
Understanding human intents from multimodal signals is critical for analyzing human behaviors and enhancing human-machine interactions in real-world scenarios.However, existing methods exhibit limitations in their modality-level reliance, constraining relational reasoning over fine-grained semantics for complex intent understanding.This paper proposes a novel LLM-Guided Semantic Relational Reasoning (LGSRR) method, which harnesses the expansive knowledge of large language models (LLMs) to establish semantic foundations that boost smaller models' relational reasoning performance.Specifically, an LLM-based strategy is proposed to extract fine-grained semantics as guidance for subsequent reasoning, driven by a shallow-to-deep Chain-of-Thought (CoT) that autonomously uncovers, describes, and ranks semantic cues by their importance without relying on manually defined priors.Besides, we formally model three fundamental types of semantic relations grounded in logical principles and analyze their nuanced interplay to enable more effective relational reasoning.Extensive experiments on multimodal intent and dialogue act recognition tasks demonstrate LGSRR's superiority over state-of-theart methods, with consistent performance gains across diverse semantic understanding scenarios.The complete data and code are available at https://github.com/thuiar/LGSRR.
Qianrui Zhou, Hua Xu 0003, Xinzhi Dong, Hanlei Zhang
EMNLP4
2025 RBench: Graduate-level Multi-disciplinary Benchmarks for LLM & MLLM Complex Reasoning Evaluation
abstract
Reasoning stands as a cornerstone of intelligence, enabling the synthesis of existing knowledge to solve complex problems. Despite remarkable progress, existing reasoning benchmarks often fail to rigorously evaluate the nuanced reasoning capabilities required for complex, real-world problemsolving, particularly in multi-disciplinary and multimodal contexts. In this paper, we introduce a graduate-level, multi-disciplinary, EnglishChinese benchmark, dubbed as Reasoning Bench (RBench), for assessing the reasoning capability of both language and multimodal models. RBench spans 1,094 questions across 108 subjects for language model evaluation and 665 questions across 83 subjects for multimodal model testing. These questions are meticulously curated to ensure rigorous difficulty calibration, subject balance, and cross-linguistic alignment, enabling the assessment to be an Olympiad-level multidisciplinary benchmark. We evaluate many models such as o1, GPT-4o, DeepSeek-R1, etc. Experimental results indicate that advanced models perform poorly on complex reasoning, especially multimodal reasoning. Even the top-performing model OpenAI o1 achieves only 53.2% accuracy on our multimodal evaluation. Data and code are made publicly available athttps://evalmodels.github.io/rbench/
Menghao Guo 0001, Yi Zhang 0099, Jiaxi Song, Haoyang Peng, Yi-Xuan Deng, Xinzhi Dong, Kiyohiro Nakayama, Zhengyang Geng, Chen Wang 0049, Bolin Ni, Yongming Rao, Houwen Peng, Han Hu 0001, Gordon Wetzstein, Shi-Min Hu 0001
ICML7
2021 Dual Graph Convolutional Networks with Transformer and Curriculum Learning for Image Captioning
abstract
Existing image captioning methods just focus on understanding the relationship between objects or instances in a single image, without exploring the contextual correlation existed among contextual image. In this paper, we propose Dual Graph Convolutional Networks (Dual-GCN) with transformer and curriculum learning for image captioning. In particular, we not only use an object-level GCN to capture the object to object spatial relation within a single image, but also adopt an image-level GCN to capture the feature information provided by similar images. With the well-designed Dual-GCN, we can make the linguistic transformer better understand the relationship between different objects in a single image and make full use of similar images as auxiliary information to generate a reasonable caption description for a single image. Meanwhile, with a cross-review strategy introduced to determine difficulty levels, we adopt curriculum learning as the training strategy to increase the robustness and generalization of our proposed model. We conduct extensive experiments on the large-scale MS COCO dataset, and the experimental results powerfully demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms recent state-of-the-art approaches. It achieves a BLEU-1 score of 82.2 and a BLEU-2 score of 67.6. Our source code is available at https://github.com/Unbear430/DGCN-for-image-captioning.
Xinzhi Dong, Chengjiang Long, Wenju Xu, Chunxia Xiao
ACM Multimedia1
2020 ARShadowGAN: Shadow Generative Adversarial Network for Augmented Reality in Single Light Scenes
abstract
Generating virtual object shadows consistent with the real-world environment shading effects is important but challenging in computer vision and augmented reality applications. To address this problem, we propose an end-to-end Generative Adversarial Network for shadow generation named ARShadowGAN for augmented reality in single light scenes. Our ARShadowGAN makes full use of attention mechanism and is able to directly model the mapping relation between the virtual object shadow and the real-world environment without any explicit estimation of the illumination and 3D geometric information. In addition, we collect an image set which provides rich clues for shadow generation and construct a dataset for training and evaluating our proposed ARShadowGAN. The extensive experimental results show that our proposed ARShadowGAN is capable of directly generating plausible virtual object shadows in single light scenes. Our source code is available at https://github.com/ldq9526/ARShadowGAN.
Daquan Liu, Chengjiang Long, Hongpan Zhang, Hanning Yu, Xinzhi Dong, Chunxia Xiao
CVPR5