Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
M. A. Sattar
dblp:272/1811
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1977
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Physical-layer communications · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications
equalization |
0.0 | 1 | 1977 | Approximations to a Joint Detection/Decoding Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1977 |
Physical-layer communications › interference
intersymbol interference |
0.0 | 1 | 1977 | Approximations to a Joint Detection/Decoding Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1977 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
decoding |
0.0 | 1 | 1977 | Approximations to a Joint Detection/Decoding Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1977 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › channel decoding
joint detection and decoding |
0.0 | 1 | 1977 | Approximations to a Joint Detection/Decoding Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1977 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
viterbi algorithm · 0.0maximum likelihood detection · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1977 | Approximations to a Joint Detection/Decoding AlgorithmabstractThe problem of optimally detecting coded data transmitted over channels which produce intersymbol interference is examined. The optimum bit-by-bit detector structure which directly estimates the transmitted data symbols from the received signal at the channel output is given. The performance of this joint detector is contrasted to that of a receiver in which the decision process is partitioned into the usual detector followed by a decoder. Even when the detector and decoder are separately optimized (bit-by-bit criterion), the joint detector is shown to considerably out perform the separately optimized structure, thereby illustrating the considerable loss of information resulting from partitioning of the decision process. Two near optimum algorithms which significantly reduce the complexity of the optimum joint detector are given. These relatively simple algorithms, which approximate the joint detector, are shown to be capable of performance superior to that of the more complex, separately optimized detector/decoder structure. The joint detector and the approximate algorithms presented offer an attractive alternative to the soft decision decoder which also attempts to overcome the loss of information resulting from sharp partitioning of the detector/ decoder decisions. Bruce D. Fritchman, C. D. Hafer, J. C. Mixsell, M. A. Sattar |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 4 |