Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

R. P. Coutts

dblp:272/2290 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1978
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › modulation › line coding
partial response signaling		 0.011978
Effect of Phase Ripple on Class 4 Partial Response Data Signals · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1978
Physical-layer communications
signal processing for communications		 0.011978
Effect of Phase Ripple on Class 4 Partial Response Data Signals · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1978
Physical-layer communications › signal processing for communications › statistical signal processing › estimation theory
mean-square error analysis		 0.011978
Effect of Phase Ripple on Class 4 Partial Response Data Signals · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1978
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1978 Effect of Phase Ripple on Class 4 Partial Response Data Signals
abstract
An expression is derived for the mean square error of a SSBAM or a baseband multilevel class 4 partial response data signal when distorted by a channel which has a sinusoidal phase ripple. Such characteristics are approximated when the channel has been equalized by so called "bump" group delay equalizers. Included are the expressions for the optimum carrier phase and sampling time. For a low frequency group delay ripple, it is shown that the error can vary by a factor of seven for differing frequency and phasing of the ripple with the same peak group delay variation.
R. P. Coutts, B. M. Smith
 IEEE Trans. Commun.1