EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zain H. Saleem
dblp:272/2393 · also Zain Hamid Saleem
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8182-2764ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization › domain-specific compilation
quantum compilation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | QuCLEAR: Clifford Extraction and Absorption for Quantum Circuit Optimization · HPCA 2025 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum circuit optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | QuCLEAR: Clifford Extraction and Absorption for Quantum Circuit Optimization · HPCA 2025 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | QuCLEAR: Clifford Extraction and Absorption for Quantum Circuit Optimization · HPCA 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum error mitigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | QuTracer: Mitigating Quantum Gate and Measurement Errors by Tracing Subsets of Qubits · ISCA 2024 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
NISQ devices |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | QuTracer: Mitigating Quantum Gate and Measurement Errors by Tracing Subsets of Qubits · ISCA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
clifford extraction · 1.7clifford absorption · 1.7qubit subsetting pauli checks · 0.8pauli check sandwiching · 0.8circuit cutting · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | QuCLEAR: Clifford Extraction and Absorption for Quantum Circuit OptimizationabstractQuantum computing carries significant potential for addressing practical problems. However, currently available quantum devices suffer from noisy quantum gates, which degrade the fidelity of executed quantum circuits. Therefore, quantum circuit optimization is crucial for obtaining useful results. In this paper, we present QuCLEAR, a compilation framework designed to optimize quantum circuits. QuCLEAR significantly reduces both the two-qubit gate count and the circuit depth through two novel optimization steps. First, we introduce the concept of Clifford Extraction, which extracts Clifford subcircuits to the end of the circuit while optimizing the gates. Second, since Clifford circuits are classically simulatable, we propose Clifford Absorption, which efficiently processes the extracted Clifford subcircuits classically. We demonstrate our framework on quantum simulation circuits, which have wideranging applications in quantum chemistry simulation, manybody physics, and combinatorial optimization problems. Nearterm algorithms such as VQE and QAOA also fall within this category. Experimental results across various benchmarks show that QuCLEAR achieves up to a 77.7% reduction in CNOT gate count and up to an 84.1% reduction in entangling depth compared with state-of-the-art methods. Ji Liu 0007, Alvin Gonzales, Benchen Huang, Zain H. Saleem, Paul D. Hovland |
HPCA | 4 |
| 2024 | QuTracer: Mitigating Quantum Gate and Measurement Errors by Tracing Subsets of QubitsabstractQuantum error mitigation plays a crucial role in the current noisy-intermediate-scale-quantum (NISQ) era. As we advance towards achieving a practical quantum advantage in the near term, error mitigation emerges as an indispensable component. One notable prior work, Jigsaw, demonstrates that measurement crosstalk errors can be effectively mitigated by measuring subsets of qubits. Jigsaw operates by running multiple copies of the original circuit, each time measuring only a subset of qubits. The localized distributions yielded from measurement subsetting suffer from less crosstalk and are then used to update the global distribution, thereby achieving improved output fidelity. Inspired by the idea of measurement subsetting, we propose QuTracer, a framework designed to mitigate both gate and measurement errors in subsets of qubits by tracing the states of qubit subsets throughout the computational process. In order to achieve this goal, we introduce a technique, qubit subsetting Pauli checks (QSPC), which utilizes circuit cutting and Pauli Check Sandwiching (PCS) to trace the qubit subsets distribution to mitigate errors. The QuTracer framework can be applied to various algorithms including, but not limited to, VQE, QAOA, quantum arithmetic circuits, QPE, and Hamiltonian simulations. In our experiments, we perform both noisy simulations and real device experiments to demonstrate that QuTracer is scalable and significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches. Peiyi Li 0002, Ji Liu 0007, Alvin Gonzales, Zain H. Saleem, Huiyang Zhou, Paul D. Hovland |
ISCA | 4 |
| 2024 | Quantum Circuit Cutting for Classical ShadowsabstractClassical shadow tomography is a sample-efficient technique for characterizing quantum systems and predicting many of their properties. Circuit cutting is a technique for dividing large quantum circuits into smaller fragments that can be executed more robustly using fewer quantum resources. We introduce a divide-and-conquer circuit cutting method for estimating the expectation values of observables using classical shadows. We derive a general formula for making predictions using the classical shadows of circuit fragments from arbitrarily cut circuits and provide the sample complexity analysis for the case when observables factorize across fragments. Then, we numerically show that our divide-and-conquer method outperforms traditional uncut shadow tomography when estimating high-weight observables that act non-trivially on many qubits and discuss the mechanisms for this advantage. Daniel Tzu Shiuan Chen, Zain H. Saleem, Michael A. Perlin |
ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. | 2 |