Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ousmane Issa
dblp:272/3629
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data integration and cleaning · 57% Database theory · 23% Query processing and optimization · 20% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data integration and cleaning
data profiling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | INCA: Inconsistency-Aware Data Profiling and Querying · SIGMOD Conference 2021 |
Database theory
query answering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | INCA: Inconsistency-Aware Data Profiling and Querying · SIGMOD Conference 2021 |
Query processing and optimization
top-k query processing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Evaluating Top-k Queries with Inconsistency Degrees · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Data integration and cleaning › data preprocessing › data cleaning
constraint-based data cleaning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | INCA: Inconsistency-Aware Data Profiling and Querying · SIGMOD Conference 2021 |
Data integration and cleaning › data preprocessing
data cleaning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | INCA: Inconsistency-Aware Data Profiling and Querying · SIGMOD Conference 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
why-provenance · 0.5polynomial provenance · 0.5denial constraints · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | INCA: Inconsistency-Aware Data Profiling and QueryingabstractWhen exploring and querying inconsistent data, inconsistency measures referring to constraint violations can help the user to quantify the quality of the underlying data and query results. We showcase INCA, a system that allows the user to execute data profiling and query answering tasks in an inconsistency-aware fashion. By using data instances annotated with novel inconsistency measures based on why-provenance and polynomial provenance, it becomes possible to visualize the share of the data which is consistent or inconsistent with respect to one or multiple denial constraints. Furthermore, data exploration by constraint or by subset of constraints allows to inspect the tuple violations according to multifaceted criteria. Finally, query profiling allows to enable inconsistency-aware query results accounting for most (in-)consistent top-k and threshold query results. To the best of our knowledge, INCA is the first system to allow such an inconsistency-driven analysis of both data and query results. Such an analysis is especially fruitful for enabling selective constraint-based data cleaning and inconsistency-aware ranking of query results in data science pipelines, thus leading to more explainable outputs of those processes. Ousmane Issa, Angela Bonifati, Farouk Toumani |
SIGMOD Conference | 1 |
| 2020 | Evaluating Top-k Queries with Inconsistency Degrees
Ousmane Issa, Angela Bonifati, Farouk Toumani |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |