Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christopher Diehl
dblp:272/4414
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5326-534XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Autonomous driving · 51% 3D vision · 22% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 22% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Autonomous driving › autonomous vehicle testing
closed-loop evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LoRD: Adapting Differentiable Driving Policies to Distribution Shifts · ICRA 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
distribution shift adaptation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LoRD: Adapting Differentiable Driving Policies to Distribution Shifts · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
dynamic scene understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DIO: Decomposable Implicit 4D Occupancy-Flow World Model · CVPR 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
planning and control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LoRD: Adapting Differentiable Driving Policies to Distribution Shifts · ICRA 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | LoRD: Adapting Differentiable Driving Policies to Distribution Shifts · ICRA 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | LoRD: Adapting Differentiable Driving Policies to Distribution Shifts · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
semantic scene completion |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | DIO: Decomposable Implicit 4D Occupancy-Flow World Model · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
world model · 0.9multi-task fine-tuning · 0.9low-rank residual decoder · 0.9instance prompt · 0.9implicit neural representation · 0.9closed-loop evaluation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | DIO: Decomposable Implicit 4D Occupancy-Flow World ModelabstractWe present DIO, a flexible world model that can estimate the scene occupancy-flow from a sparse set of LiDAR observations, and decompose it into individual instances. DIO can not only complete instance shapes at the present time, but also forecast their occupancy-flow evolution over a future horizon. Thanks to its flexible prompt representation, DIO can take instance prompts from off-the-shelf models like 3D detectors, achieving state-of-the-art performance in the task of 4D semantic occupancy completion and forecasting on the Argoverse 2 dataset. Moreover, our world model can easily and effectively be transferred to downstream tasks like LiDAR point cloud forecasting, ranking first compared to all baselines in the Argoverse 4D occupancy forecasting challenge. Christopher Diehl, Quinlan Sykora, Ben Agro, Thomas Gilles, Sergio Casas 0002, Raquel Urtasun |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2025 | LoRD: Adapting Differentiable Driving Policies to Distribution ShiftsabstractDistribution shifts between operational domains can severely affect the performance of learned models in self-driving vehicles (SDVs). While this is a well-established problem, prior work has mostly explored naive solutions such as fine-tuning, focusing on the motion prediction task. In this work, we explore novel adaptation strategies for differentiable autonomy stacks (structured policy) consisting of prediction, planning, and control, perform evaluation in closed-loop, and investigate the often-overlooked issue of catastrophic forgetting. Specifically, we introduce two simple yet effective techniques: a low-rank residual decoder (LoRD) and multi-task fine-tuning. Through experiments across three models conducted on two real-world autonomous driving datasets (nuPlan, exiD), we demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods and highlight a significant performance gap between open-loop and closed-loop evaluation in prior approaches. Our approach improves forgetting by up to 23.33% and the closed-loop out-of-distribution driving score by 9.93% in comparison to standard fine-tuning. https://github.com/rst-tu-dortmund/LoRD Christopher Diehl, Péter Karkus, Sushant Veer, Marco Pavone 0001, Torsten Bertram |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2025 | HiLO: High-Level Object Fusion for Autonomous Driving Using TransformersabstractThe fusion of sensor data is essential for a robust perception of the environment in autonomous driving. Learning-based fusion approaches mainly use feature-level fusion to achieve high performance, but their complexity and hardware requirements limit their applicability in near-production vehicles. High-level fusion methods offer robustness with lower computational requirements. Traditional methods, such as the Kalman filter, dominate this area. This paper modifies the Adapted Kalman Filter (AKF) and proposes a novel transformer-based high-level object fusion method called HiLO. Experimental results demonstrate improvements of 25.9 percentage points in$\mathbf{F}_{1}$score and 6.1 percentage points in mean IoU. Evaluation on a new large-scale real-world dataset demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approaches. Their generalizability is further validated by cross-domain evaluation between urban and highway scenarios. Code, data, and models are available at https://github.com/rst-tu-dortmund/HiLO. Timo Osterburg, Franz Albers, Christopher Diehl, Rajesh Pushparaj, Torsten Bertram |
IV | 3 |